Topic

site being hacked

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 14 posts - 76 through 89 (of 89 total)
Roger Caffin BPL Member
PostedOct 18, 2012 at 5:31 pm

> There's gotta be a way to stop these mass spambot attacks.
Yes, but most good methods are highly illegal. The authorities look down on taking someone into a dark alley and discussing the matter with them with a rubber hose. Pity.

> I haven't seen anything of this magnitude on the other forums I follow. Maybe
> they've just been lucky
The SW they use was upgraded recently to handle automatic account creation. Oh, great!

If you can find a good way of stopping spambots and SW like Xrumer, the world will absolutly LOVE you. At present the spammers are a few microns on the right side of the law.

> especially if the spambots figure out what time Roger goes to sleep!
The All Seeing Eye never sleeps…
Yeah, we will work on that.

Cheers

PostedOct 18, 2012 at 5:34 pm

Okay, my picture didn't work. I wasn't pointing at the fabric breathability thread, I was pointing to the space above it where another thread should be listed, but is not.

Threads aren't reappearing automatically either. Look at threads I listed earlier. At least one of those still isn't visible, and that was from a couple days ago. One in particular is "Wilderness Survival MB- Low Impact Shelters". So is "Big Agnes Fly Creek 2 Platinum Tent Review" and "How many BPL members have you met?" and "Forbes rifle"…and linked to already in this thread as being invisible.

I have bumped a few threads to make them visible again, but I didn't with others so that they could be used as examples of invisible threads. I shouldn't need to provide examples though. If you go into most of the minor forums, you'll see that there's a big gap of time where there aren't any threads. Look at the time stamps of the remaining threads, and it's highly unusual for that gap to be so big.

Bob Bankhead BPL Member
PostedOct 18, 2012 at 6:11 pm

@Roger:

"> There's gotta be a way to stop these mass spambot attacks.
Yes, but most good methods are highly illegal. The authorities look down on taking someone into a dark alley and discussing the matter with them with a rubber hose. Pity."

sarcasim

Mary D BPL Member
PostedOct 19, 2012 at 1:17 pm

Attack #4 in a week; obviously the same spambot because advertising the same stuff. BPL may have to go to some system of verifying new unpaid members before allowing them to post. I've seen other sites do that when under persistent attack.

It's basically making the forums completely unusable. There's no point in staying on this forum while this is going on. I still suspect that this is the goal of the people behind these spambots!

PostedOct 19, 2012 at 1:47 pm

This has got to stop. Too many people are paying too much money for this little security.

PostedOct 19, 2012 at 2:40 pm

You guys are absolutely right. This is what I was talking about. The spam makes the forum hard enough to use, but makes it virtually worthless when the threads are removed like the index. Until my post here is posted, this thread won't be listed. If you went into the "Forum Admin & Support" forum while I'm typing this, you wouldn't see this thread listed. The content in this forum doesn't have any value if we can't find it. The outcome is the same as if a hacker had come in and deleted posts or performed a denial of service attack.

Anyhow…

Bumping again to make this thread visible again after the latest spam attack.

Dena Kelley BPL Member
PostedOct 19, 2012 at 3:00 pm

Is it possible for the mods to insert a place-holding comment into a thread before deleting all the spam? that way the thread still shows up?

I think the mods are doing a FANTASTIC job of deleting the spam ASAP. Now if we could just figure out how to keep the threads from going invisible?

PostedOct 19, 2012 at 3:10 pm

I believe the place holder would need to come after the spam is deleted. It'd be better if the reference to the thread in the index wasn't deleted. Yeah, it'd cause deleted spam to phantom bump threads, but that's better than invisible threads.

James Marco BPL Member
PostedOct 19, 2012 at 5:51 pm

"I believe the place holder would need to come after the spam is deleted. It'd be better if the reference to the thread in the index wasn't deleted. Yeah, it'd cause deleted spam to phantom bump threads, but that's better than invisible threads."

I suspect that doing ANY deletion would cause the index/database mismatch. Unfortunatly, any manual deletion, could cause a problem. There are other circumstances…
typical example:
Records (all the same size) Index
record(1,2,3) belong to thread A index A is (#1,#2,#3)
record(4,5,6) belong to thread B index B is (#4,#5,#6)

Manually, we mark the database record 2 as spam, then delete it putting it in an "unused" list.

We always have to start at the beginning, so we will assume 1 (ordinality and cardinality are different, though)
So now our database is
Records Index
record(1,3) belong to thread A index A is (#1,#2,#3) (we didn't change it)
record(4,5,6) belong to thread B index B is (#4,#5,#6) (no changes here)

If I index to record 3, where do I go? Count three records, by the index. I am actually now looking at a different thread, record 4, in thread B. I look up the header and dutifully report thread B and update the subject list. But, duplicates are not allowed, so, I delete the second instance of thead B that I come to. The program is happy because it did it's job. From my standpoint Index A is removed from the list…it "Disapeared." But, the records are still there and intact.
(Just an example, it might not happen quite this way. Old, unsophisticated programs are known to do this or in some cases, actually crash. Just do not try to delete the last record of the ENTIRE database…not sure how *that* will be handled…)

Bruce Tolley BPL Member
PostedOct 20, 2012 at 9:30 pm

Right now the site is blocking (by human action) known "bad guys. " This is akin to keeping your front door unlocked and open and waiting to recognize the last guy burgled your house and tackle him on the threshold.

A solution would be to go to a scheme were only known good guys/gals were allowed access. This would of course make it harder for guests to register (and most likely require a challenge response registration process) and delay guest postings but would deliver a quality of service to the paid membership. Moving to HTTPS might help too.

PostedOct 21, 2012 at 3:51 pm

Geez, and another spam attack starts yet again. My post count is quickly going to jump a few thousand with all this uninvisibility bumping needed to keep threads around.

George Geist BPL Member
PostedOct 23, 2012 at 1:42 pm

Can someone in admin bump the thread under Philmont called "Freezer bag cooking"
It has become invisible.

thanks
Al

Viewing 14 posts - 76 through 89 (of 89 total)
Loading...