Topic

Carrying your camera

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 30 total)
PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 1:01 pm

I'm curious to know how everyone carries their camera. So far, I've been using a vertical pouch with loops at the top and a zipper on the side. I thread my sternum strap through the loops and can quickly get my camera via the zipper. This works well for easy access, but not so well because it's bouncing around. I don't like using my waste belt pocket because every time I put down my pack, I forget the camera is in there an I put it always finds a rock. It's just a matter of time before it gets broken.

So, what do you use to secure your camera in a way that gives fast and easy access but protects the camera? I'm thinking something on the shoulder strap, but am unsure of what yet.

PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 1:17 pm

I keep mine in my ZPacks Multipack, which happens to ride on my front at chest level and is attached to my shoulder straps. It is safe inside the Multipack from tree limbs or what not scraping by, from a quick rain, or from bouncing around. However, it is very easy for me to quickly unzip the Multipack, reach in and grab the camera.

http://sticksblog.com/gear/my-current-gear/backpack/zpacks-blast-30-backpack-multipack/

PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 1:33 pm

The zpacks multi pack would be good but a tad heavy. You can also get a shoulder pocket from zpacks for about .3 oz but it won't offer as much protection or storage as Chad's suggestion.

PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 1:57 pm

I definitely wouldn't get the Multipack to use just for the camera as that would be total overkill. However, I carry all of my daily use items inside this pack though. Saying this, the weight of the Multipack is lighter than if I were to add hip belt pockets plus other "pockets" around the pack. So, in this light, the single pouch Multipack is indeed a very lightweight option. Granted, it comes down to your packing needs/likes.

Before I started using the Multipack, I simply kept my camera either in my pant's front pocket or in the zippered chest pocket on my shirt/windshirt.

Mike W BPL Member
PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 2:17 pm

I carry my camera in the pocket of my cargo pants. I've tried putting it in various pocket attachements on my pack but if there is a zipper or whatever involved, I am less likely to bother pulling it out. I also agree that when attached to the pack it is at risk of hitting against something hard when dropping the pack. I did this a few times but never broke the camera.

My cargo pants pocket has worked well for me but I have broken the screen once doing this. Maybe my next camera will be one of the "tough" cameras.

I also only buy cameras that are waterproof because I know it will get wet while fishing/hiking and adding a waterproof bag guarantees that I won't bother pulling it out for a quick shot.

Bob Gross BPL Member
PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 2:20 pm

You really need to define the specific camera and lens. My camera with standard trail lens and accessories run about 8 pounds, so I go with a heavy Lowepro top-loading camera bag worn over one shoulder.

You also want to define your typical photo targets. As an example, if you shoot landscapes, then you can unzip the top, pull out the camera, line up the shot, and click. Others of us go after wildlife, so we need a camera bag that can be flipped open instantly, the camera pulled out, and click. I bypassed the top flap zipper on my Lowepro with a Velcro strap for speed of entry.

Also, you don't want your camera bag hanging down too far if you intend to be crossing any high-water streams. Good camera bags are weatherproof, but they are not commonly rated for submersion. While crossing one deep stream last summer, I had about two drops of water get into the camera compartment, but I could deal with that quickly once I got across.

–B.G.–

PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 2:34 pm

Chad, I totally agree with you. It all comes down to your own needs. I would absolutely love to have that multipack but I just can't do it for what it weighs and I know it ain't much.

I originally went from having no pockets on my pack besides the back mesh pocket to now I added that zpacks shoulder pocket. I can say that before I hardly ever pulled my phone/camera out for pictures unless it was in my pocket. Now I'm hoping to use it as much as possible.

To the OP: really I guess you have unlimited options. You just have to find what works best for you ya know?

John S. BPL Member
PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 3:28 pm

Either a Case Logic camera pouch or dollar store neoprene pouch, both fitting on chest strap of pack.

PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 5:04 pm

Long gone are my days of carrying big glass, so I'm just carrying a point and shoot anymore.

It's seeming like the zpacks shoulder pouch might be best. It would be cool to have the security of SnapR strap though with the tripod adapter.

Greg F BPL Member
PostedFeb 18, 2012 at 8:13 pm

I use the hip pockets on my circuit for my Epm-1 with pancake lens on it. I also keep a longer zoom in very small stuff sack attached with the water bottle holders.

I am not completely satisfied though an really need to add some padding to protect them. I am thinking about using 3d mesh inside pockets. Or making my Own fully water proof bag.

For me I dont want my camera too acessable otherwise I take too many pictures and feel that i experience the trip in the third person. I want to make a decision to take pictures at certain times rather than having the camera in hand ready to go

PostedFeb 19, 2012 at 4:03 am

For my hiking camera, I carry an Olympus E-P3 camera with 12mm f2 and 100-300mm lenses. The 12mm generally lives on the camera, and the camera is attached directly the shoulder strap via a Peak Design Capture Clip;

http://peakdesignltd.com/capture.htm

The camera and lens are then covered via a myog cuben fibre/neoprene rain cover. The 100-300 mm lens are attached to the other strap via a myog cuben fibre/neoprene lens case.

The system works really well, as the camera doesn't swing about and can be removed and used really easily. The capture clip uses arca swiss compatible plates, so the camera can be clipped straight to a tripod. I have tried a whole load of options for carrying my camera, and this is the best option I have used to date.

John Nausieda BPL Member
PostedFeb 19, 2012 at 8:58 am

It seems to me that if you have two identical quick release platforms one could be mounted to your strap or belt just with a 1/4" screw and washer and serve the same purpose at almost no additional cost. The other platform stays on your tripod. You of course want an easy to use and secure platform.

Rick Dreher BPL Member
PostedFeb 19, 2012 at 9:29 am

Hi Kier,

My preferred way to carry a small camera is in a flip-top padded case threaded onto the shoulder strap and riding at the base, above the waist belt. It's handy, it's unobtrusive, it's protected from dripping sweat, and it doesn't interfere with trekking poles or get bashed into rocks.

Cheers,

Rick

PostedFeb 19, 2012 at 9:54 am

@John Nausieda

Is this in reference to the Capture Clip? If so, then I mostly agree. I was actually contemplating on putting together something similar myself before I came across the capture clip. But I have to say that it has been very nicely designed and it would be hard and not so cheap to make one yourself that performed as well. It is easy to add and remove the clip from anywhere that has a strap or belt. The camera is also very easily inserted in or removed from the clip, with an easy to access safety catchment making sure the camera doesn't go anywhere when you don't want it to.

The only things I would change are the ability to adjust the position of the quick release on the camera by using a slot rather than a hole for the screw. On my camera, the plate slightly covers the battery and memory card doors, meaning I have to remove the plate when adding a new card or battery. I would also make some system by which L-Plates were compatible with the clip. If you could use Really Right Stuff brackets with the clip, the system would be perfect!

John Nausieda BPL Member
PostedFeb 19, 2012 at 10:10 am

Yes my remarks were in reference to the Capture clip. It occurred to me because I happen to have 2 Slik DQ quick release bases and matching QR plates which are magnesium and pretty similar. I happened to get them on ebay for very little and they actually cost more than the Capture clip at retail. They have two bubble levels and I shoot a lot of architecture and horizons.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/376258-REG/Slik_618_711_DQ_L_Quick_Release_Adapter.html

After reading the fantastic reviews of the Capture clip at Amazon and B&H I have to admit it is sounding like first choice except for the plate compatibility issue possibly leading to another ballhead which can be pretty expensive.

PostedFeb 19, 2012 at 11:35 am

Back when I used to carry a small digital camera, it would usually spend most of its time in my side pockets on my hiking pants. That way it was easily accessed, and for the most part it stayed safe.

Then awhile back I moved up to m4/3 cameras for better picture quality, and I had been carrying it in a case attached to my hip belt. Works great and keep its protected, all while having easy access to it.

John Nausieda BPL Member
PostedFeb 19, 2012 at 12:31 pm

I agree great quality , but when I use a tripod it is either a Velbon 343E or a Velbon ultra maxi usually with the smallest Velbon ballhead. Once in a blue moon I will mount a Davis and Sanford Centerball 38F mostly for panorama. I shoot mostly handheld with a Canon s95 using a 1-2 second timer for steadier shots. The tripods , including a CF Fancier , are getting left at home more and more.The one which stays on the s95 is
this very different Joby.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/825599-REG/Joby_GP20_01AM_GORILLAPOD_MICRO_800_GRAY.html

PostedFeb 19, 2012 at 2:11 pm

For my PCT thru hike this year, I have made what may possibly be the lightest tripod to take an arca swiss plates ever.

It is based around Velbon V-Pod legs;

http://www.parkcameras.com/9616/Velbon-V-Pod.html

That I have ripped the head off, removed any and all excess bits of plastic. I then added a Giottos MH 1004 ballhead;

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/221096-REG/Giottos_MH1004_320_MH_1004_Mini_Ball.html

And again removed the excess plastic bit at the top and shortened the top screw. Finally to the top I added a Kirk QRC-1 1" quick release clamp that takes Arca Swiss plates;

http://www.kirkphoto.com/1_in_Quick_Release_Clamp.html

This gives me a tripod that extends to about 100cm, is strong enough to take a micro four thirds setup (and could maybe hold a light DSLR at a pinch!) but only weights about 290g (10oz) in total. Pretty pleased with the setup. Admittedly I wouldn't like to use it in strong winds, but it should be more than enough for some timelapse and sunset/sunrise shots. :)

John Nausieda BPL Member
PostedFeb 19, 2012 at 3:00 pm

Very nice set-up. I'd like to hear more about what you removed from the Velbon and how you put the new head on.

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 30 total)
Loading...