I’m not an expert on this matter either Geoff. There may be some difference as to quality between official Evazote brand EVA foam and other EVA foams, but I can’t imagine with a similar or same base materials that this difference would be tremendous.
An analogy might be something like the difference between Dyneema or Spectra brand highly oriented UHMWPE fibers vs less expensive Chinese versions. Yes, the latter tend to be a bit less strong and durable than the former, but they are still remarkably strong and durable compared to other different materials.
Corporations and marketeers are always trying to convince us, and often not very honestly, that their product, their material, etc is far superior to another’s similar or same product or material. Sometimes there is some truth to such claims, but there are plenty of times when it’s mostly marketing spin, especially as to “claimed proportion of difference”.
I tend to be somewhat skeptical in approach, especially in relation to any endeavor that potentially involves profit and/or greed factors.
I’ve bought “off brand” or non Zotefoam brand EVA foam before and it seemed durable enough.
Not considering the brand: “Plasta” (or blue or primarily cross linked polyethylene) type foams vs EVA foams do have some noticeable differences in durability. They are different kinds of foam with different chemical makeup. As Richard N. noted earlier in this thread, blue type foams or what Zotefoam company calls their Plastazote foam line, have a much lower EVA content than EVA labeled foams. The EVA part is primarily what increases the durability/strength, greater UV resistance, and slightly higher R value.
Perhaps someone like Richard N., with more knowledge on the matter can help to correct any of this if it’s off?