Hi Roger,
Your last photo suggests that your ‘customer’ is going with just three of the elbowed poles, The use of the frame in the photo is more like what I meant by ‘tailoring,’ and is similar to ones seen a few times on your FAQ section of the Aussie website.
But have learned that using flexible poles, some tent designs can change the shape of the flexible poles when the fabric is tightened over hoops or gothic arches. So must tailor the canopy over the flexible poles to be sure that the fabric has the right bias stretch, size and shape to be taut. Scale models can provide some idea, but only if the flex of the music wire representing the poles bends to the same extent as the carbon poles on the full size pole framework.  As it works out, the additional bend of the poles adds a few more inches of deflection that make the the canopy walls more convex, hence the tent is more spacious inside.
That may sound like the tent does not maintain its shape in wind, or is ‘floppy’; but in practice the canopy fabric actually works in conjunction with the pole framework to make the structure more rigid. Just requires more work to get the dimensions right. Never thought things could get this complicated, but life is for learning.
Expect you and MYOG fans have seen the repeated pix of the canopy prototype, so won’t add yet another picture. Am also bogged down with trying to find a superlight fabric that will be competitive with DCF. Only because DCF may not be having a come back, and want to do a tent that folks can make with fabric that is readily available, and yes, reasonably priced. Those efforts are reported on the Gear forum in a recent thread about issues with DCF.
After my late cousin went into a nursing home, he passed on to me the work he was doing on writing the family history, work that was earlier begun by my late aunt. My efforts waned, the project suffered, and it is now probably with the family heirlooms. Hope the tent does not suffer the same fate.