Hi John
> I was a bit wary of the negative comments about the Soto Micro Regulator as they
> seemed theoretical only, not based on side-by-side trials comparing the Regulator
> against needle-valve type stoves.
With all due respect, I suggest you should subscribe to BPL and read our TECHNICAL reviews of stoves before judging. The custom test system we use includes the real-time data logging of emitted CO, water temperature, canister mass (rate of fuel consumption), burner-pot clearance, and several other factors as appropriate too. And I have a PhD in physics to drive all this.
> Product reviews on the REI website include testimonials from users
Without hard science measurements, testimonials are just gossip. You get what you were looking for. Sure, a comment that X did not work has value, but that is about as far as it goes.
> since scientific theories are themselves highly susceptible to
> misunderstanding and misapplication, experimentation is needed to prove one
> has got the theory right.
Quite right. However, with 35+ years of professional research experience, I think I can run an experiment without making too many bungles. And the results are published here.
You will find a full and very technical review of the SOTO OD-1R stove here at BPL:
http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/soto_od-1r_canister_stove_product_review.html
> But I can’t see how a pressure regulator would help where help is most needed
Indeed, and our review does say that.
Cheers

