Topic

So, What’s an UL Weight? SUL?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
Zachary Crane BPL Member
PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 2:46 pm

I'm just curious as to what everyone sees as an ultralight base weight. We can extend that a little further to bring in peoples thoughts on Super Ultralight base weights.

Bring on the opinions!

(Sorry if this has been discussed before. This subject is nearly impossible to search the forums for)

PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 2:50 pm

Yeah it's been discussed a lot. There are varying opinions but generally it's:

<5 lbs – SUL
<10 lbs – UL
<20 lbs – Lightweight
>20 lbs – Traditional

Zachary Crane BPL Member
PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 2:52 pm

Thanks Dan.

Sorry to bring it up, since it's been discussed before. Very interesting though!

Travis L BPL Member
PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 2:59 pm

Some peg Ultralight at <12, and lightweight in the low 20's. There's no hard rule about it, as Dan said.

Jay Wilkerson BPL Member
PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 3:04 pm

I have a base weight around 9 LBS but I am 6'3 235. Is there a ratio depending on you height and weight. The Skerkas and Jordans of the BPL community are tiny compared to to me-they have very lightweight packs but I almost way 100 LBS more then them. Maybe I am SUL because of my weight and height.. Are there any math peolpe that can make a equation are a ratio based on Dans numbers and body weight and size?

Just curious….

PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 3:07 pm

XUL is sub-5 lb full skin out weight i.e. everything you are carrying and wearing.

Robert Blean BPL Member
PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 3:17 pm

This whole topic was pretty well explored in a thread called Backpacking Weight Ranks

One idea for XUL was <5 lbs FSO (SUL is < 5 lbs base weight).

Jay,
Just for you — that thread had a tongue-in-cheek notion invented by Dean Fellabaum called PWI (Pack Weight Index).

— MV

Dean F. BPL Member
PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 3:21 pm

WAS it tongue-in-cheek??? :o)

And, Jay, if you are looking for a metric to define how hard it is for you to carry a pack of a given weight compared to an "average" 5'10" hiker, then you want PWIn or EPW. (But I think EPW is a better metric. See the last page of that thread.)

BUT if you just want an idea of how much harder it is for you to lighten your pack because some of your gear must be bigger, then you want HAPWE.

I have defined HAPWE and EPW as the "standard" metrics, and have abandoned the archaic PWI and PMI.

Again, Ryan, be sure to get it all correct in your next edition, and spell my name correctly. :o)

Robert Blean BPL Member
PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 3:31 pm

> WAS it tongue-in-cheek??? :o)

Beats me … only the author knows, and I doubt he is telling.

But there were clues … let everyone read and decide for themselves …

— MV

Ken Thompson BPL Member
PostedFeb 25, 2010 at 5:06 pm

Jay I think you're super. I too am 6'3" 220lbs 9 pound base as well. That is SUL as far as I'm concerned. We are bigger if anyone wants to disagree ;-)

Jay Wilkerson BPL Member
PostedFeb 26, 2010 at 5:30 pm

Thanks Dean, That's a whole lot of info- I get it-I think!!! I JUST NEED TO LOOSE SAY 10 LBS ON THE HOOF!

-Jay

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
Loading...