Topic

Canyonlands vs Arches

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
PostedNov 9, 2015 at 9:08 pm

Folks, below is a story I wrote about Canyonlands and Arches for The Sacramento Bee. Would love to hear any feedback, though I realize the focus is a bit general for the BPL audience. http://www.sacbee.com/entertainment/living/travel/article43215576.html#storylink=cpy BY BRAD BRANAN bbranan@sacbee.com MOAB, UTAH A sign at Arches National Park features a quote that reads: “Let the people walk.” It’s a line taken from Ed Abbey’s 1968 nature writing classic “Desert Solitaire.” It might seem like an odd choice: Arches, and its nearest city, Moab, Utah, have become virtually everything “Cactus Ed” hated. The asphalt road ribboning through the park has turned Arches into an epitome of “windshield tourism,” allowing visitors to see nearly every attraction without walking. Once-sleepy Moab has become a hub for “adventure travel,” where outfitters offer mountain biking, zip lining, off-road driving – just about everything except plain old hiking. But the quote is fitting if taken as an admonition, an interpretation that likely would have suited the curmudgeonly writer, who spent two seasons working as a ranger at Arches. In “Desert Solitaire” and other best-selling books, Abbey championed the untamed spaces, making him the conscience of Moab and a favorite of desert dwellers. “(Improving roads), the engineers and politicians and bankers will tell you, makes the region accessible to everybody, no matter how fat, feeble or flaccid. That is a lie,” he once wrote. “They will never know what we knew or understand what we cannot forget.” Southeastern Utah has become more developed since Abbey’s era, but visitors can still find ways to enjoy the starkly beautiful red-rock country that sent him into rapture – be it by foot, bike, boat or car. This corner of the state is known for its fantastic rock formations. Moab is also unique in that it has two national parks just outside city limits: Arches and Canyonlands, on opposite sides of U.S. 191 about 10 miles apart. Arches and Canyonlands represent dramatically different visions of what a national park can be. Canyonlands is less developed than Arches, making it more work to see. But explorers will be rewarded. After a day-long hike into Canyonlands – which included crossing the Colorado River – my friend and I discovered “Abbey Country” in a magical place called the Maze, with rock formations that look like candy and dolls. We also found haunting Indian art, colorful cactuses and yes, solitude. Hardcore hikers will appreciate Canyonlands while less-active travelers will prefer the easy access of Arches. Any true desert lover should see both. Arches: An auto park I started reading Abbey years ago when I lived in Tucson, Ariz. Abbey died in Tucson in 1989, a decade before my arrival. He had a cult following throughout the Southwest. He grew up in comparatively bland surroundings – southeastern Pennsylvania – and fell in love with the dramatic landscape of his adopted home. Despite writing almost two dozen books – including one turned into the 1962 Kirk Douglas movie “Lonely Are the Brave” – Abbey never really rose beyond the designation of “regional writer.” Perhaps that’s because he really just focused on one subject: his love of the desert Southwest and his loathing of the forces he saw spoiling it – cities, dams, tourism, etc. He was a bit of a crank, as illustrated in “Desert Solitaire” and “The Monkey Wrench Gang,” a fictional tale about a group of misfits who conspire to blow up the Glen Canyon Dam. Such is Abbey’s love of the desert that he wanted to be buried there sans casket – a wish his friends carried out in an undisclosed location in southwestern Arizona in 1989. In “All the Wild That Remains,” published this year, author David Gessner argues that Abbey and Wallace Stegner are two of the most important writers that outdoor enthusiasts can read today. Abbey and Stegner showed the conditions undermining the American West, while holding up with awe what remains beautiful and worth saving. Gessner traveled the West chronicled by Abbey and Stegner and called it a “place of startling beauty and jaw-dropping sights. But also a place in a world of trouble.” On a visit to Moab, Gessner notes that Abbey would have been horrified by what the place has become. Tourism is big business, as anyone can tell by looking at the city’s advertising campaign – “Moab: Where Adventure Begins.” Utah businessmen and politicians long have sought to cash in on having two national parks so close to each other. (IMPROVING ROADS), THE ENGINEERS AND POLITICIANS AND BANKERS WILL TELL YOU, MAKES THE THE REGION ACCESSIBLE TO EVERYBODY, NO MATTER HOW FAT, FEEBLE OR FLACCID. THAT IS A LIE. Ed Abbey, nature writer and environmental advocate I have nothing against mountain biking, river rafting or other activities that bring would-be adventurers to Moab. In fact, I participate in some of those sports. However, there were times during my visit to Moab when all the four-wheel-drive and other off-road vehicles gave it the feel of a Mideast war zone. And I worried that the ATVs and mountain bikes were damaging the fragile desert. Abbey shared those concerns when he was a ranger, long before Arches or Canyonlands became a national park. In a chapter of “Solitaire” called “Industrial Tourism and the National Parks,” he writes that Arches changed for the worse after he left and visitors “find serpentine streams of baroque automobiles pouring in … from 3,000 to 30,000 to 300,000 … ” These days, more than 1 million people come to Arches every year, or twice as many as to Canyonlands, which is four times the size of Arches. Natural arches abound at the park, but the real reason it attracts larger crowds is because of a paved road that brings you a short distance from all the major attractions. Delicate Arch, the red-rock wonder that adorns Utah license plates, requires the most work to see: a half-mile hike. Indian Gardens, Fiery Furnace and other beautiful geologic formations are next to parking lots. I saw every major attraction at Arches in four hours and left the park before lunch. The geology was incredible, but I felt cheated. Experiencing nature should be about more than air-conditioned sightseeing. To the credit of the managers of Arches, they give Abbey’s arguments their due in a display inside the visitors center. They also say the road was needed to meet the changing interests of American tourists who want to travel by car. Canyonlands: Into the wild In contrast, most of the 520 square miles of Canyonlands cannot be accessed by road. The park is divided into four sections: Island in the Sky, the most accessible and a popular area for mountain biking; the Needles, a more remote area with spectacular rock formations; the Rivers, where people raft the Colorado and Green rivers; and the Maze, the least accessible area in the park. Park managers long have faced pressure to build more roads into Canyonlands. They’ve largely resisted, convinced in part by Abbey, who urged managers in letters and newspaper op-ed pieces not to repeat the mistakes made at Arches, according to a Canyonlands history published by the National Park Service in 2008. The park’s managers chose a middle ground, recognizing Canyonlands as both a “major scenic attraction” and “a model for preservation of a unique natural environment.” Canyonlands’ ruggedness can make travel difficult, as my buddy and I would learn as we hiked past the spires, buttes and mesas that define the park. Carved by the Colorado and Green rivers, wind and other forms of erosion, the rock formations make the place look like another planet. Outside Magazine, Backpacker and other publications have called the Maze one of the most dangerous hikes in the country. My friend and I did not find the Maze dangerous, but that’s because we both had GPS units and paper maps to navigate through an area with few defined trails or signs. The Maze is considered risky because it’s easy to get lost there, and it’s remote. The difficulties we had were in getting to the Maze, which is why so few people visit the area. Approximately 4,000 people go to the Maze each year, and a majority of them take a truck or a jeep, a park ranger said. The drive from Moab to the heart of the Maze is six hours long, the last half over treacherous dirt roads that have probably prompted a few drivers to get out and walk. We started our hike in the Needles district, a beautiful showcase of tapering rocks that inspired its name. Rain fell not long after we left, making the ground slippery. I fell and sprained my hand and bruised an arm and a leg. No matter: I got up and continued walking, motivated by the beauty of the desert at sunset and the mystery ahead on the 10-mile hike to the Maze. The following morning, we reached our next obstacle: the Colorado River. The source of water for most of the West can be crossed only by boat at this section, the nearest bridge miles away. My buddy originally had proposed hiring a boat to carry us across. I had a better idea: my packraft. The 6-pound raft rolls up to the size of a tent, and along with a four-piece paddle, fits in my backpack. This option kept motorized travel out of the itinerary. The Colorado’s current was stiff as I ferried across with our backpacks. Trees lined the shore on the other side, complicating my docking efforts. On the return trip to pick up my companion, my raft was pulled downstream faster than before, perhaps because of its lighter weight without the packs. I eventually got to the other side, albeit several hundred feet off course. We crossed the river without incident and made our way to the Doll House, a collection of 100-foot-high sandstone spires resembling figurines. The spires form something of a gate for the Maze and provide a suitably surreal entrance. We awoke the following day eager to hike the labyrinth-like canyons of the Maze. We would encounter only one small group of people during our time in there, and they were driven in by an outfitter. We were awed by the Land of Standing Rocks, which features the Chimney Rock and the Chocolate Drops, both of which look like their names. And we were slightly unsettled by Harvest Scene, an ancient Indian pictograph of what appear to be people – some with horns and hands like forks – at the bottom of the Maze. We had to return to Moab the next day, meaning we only had one full day in the Maze. If that seems like a short time for such a difficult journey, I can only reply as Ed Abbey would have: The Maze is not for you. Go to Arches. Brad Branan: 916-321-1065, @BradB_at_SacBee MOAB Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/entertainment/living/travel/article43215576.html#storylink=cpy

Peter Bakwin BPL Member
PostedNov 10, 2015 at 1:45 pm

Good insights and very true about Canyonlands vs Arches and the development of the area for recreational tourism. I've been visiting there for over 40 years. When we first went to Moab in the early 70s there were abandoned homes and only 1 motel. We used to love to get lost in the Fiery Furnace in Arches, now you need a guide or a permit to go in there. You didn't even mention the lines to get into Arches – the park will "sell out" so that they only let a car in when one comes out. Still, there are some nice secret spots and scrambles. Canyonlands is a real wilderness park, and the CNP rangers are oriented in that direction. It's refreshing to hear from them "You're doing what??? Let me know how it goes!" instead of the usual "You can't do that." The Maze has to be one of the most remote spots in the lower 48 – it's just hard to get to. I hope it stays that way. While there have been huge changes and an enormous influx of visitors, I'm glad it's for recreation (even though there's quite a bit of motorized recreation), rather than for mining and cows. Getting people outside is good. I do notice loads of international tourists in these parks, which has to be good for the overall economy. Here are some recent trips we've done in CNP: https://adventurerun.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/happy-maze-loop/ http://blog.ultimatedirection.com/dark-needles-loop/ http://blog.ultimatedirection.com/triple-trek/ http://blog.ultimatedirection.com/triple-trek-pt2/

Brendan S BPL Member
PostedNov 12, 2015 at 10:02 am

Just to play devil's advocate, I feel like you could make an argument that the roads in the Maze are more unfortunate than Arches. Arches' location kinda limits the possibility of a large area of wilderness compared to much of Canyonlands. More is lost by being able to drive all over Canyonlands (including the Maze). To use the "wildest" district as an example, you spend (a lot) more time in your car getting to the Maze and you can still dayhike to pretty much anywhere there, just like Arches. Just being a long way away from pavement and having a reputation for being "dangerous" doesn't mean much. It's still pretty busy and there's a lot of places in Arches that feel wilder and see far fewer visitors than much of the Maze. In Arches, people stick to roads and trails and those looking for a "wild experience" head to somewhere like Canyonlands, which makes Arches' modest backcountry pretty damn awesome and empty. I mean you have to carry wag bags in Chesler Park these days because of so much use. Ask for a backcountry permit at Arches and it's like they barely know how to fill out the form. From a park management perspective, though, I agree that building roads to all of the main attractions was a travesty and Arches is one of the worst offenders. After a recent visit to Olympic NP, which seems to have slipped through the cracks with zero roads through the park, it's crazy to imagine how different many of these places would be had things been done differently…

PostedDec 7, 2015 at 10:10 pm

I agree with what you’re saying. There should be fewer roads in Canyonlands. I would consider driving to the Maze a special kind of hell, but the roads bring more people than any other.

Dennis Lee BPL Member
PostedDec 12, 2015 at 11:38 pm

I am getting a little off the point, but my family just visited both parks over Thanksgiving, and we thoroughly enjoyed the benefits of those established roads. We were able to give a quick visit to Arches’ Delicate Arch and Landscape arch before heading down to Island in the sky.  I was surprised to see how quickly and easily accessible those two landmarks were, and yet again surprised how we did not see anyone there (except one group at Delicate).  I suppose it was because of the season and the time. We did cross a few groups as we were coming back. I definately would not want to go there during the summer when it’s a zoo there.  Same with White Rim Trail in Island in the Sky. We did it over two nights on a jeep.  We had a great time covering many miles not possible on foot, and saw only a couple of other parties during the entire time.  As with any backcountry experiences,  one of the key enjoyment was the solitude.

On the contrary, when we made a quick sunrise stop at Mesa Arch in the way out, it was bombarded with photographers who filled every inch in front of the whole arch with their big cameras and tripods.  I squeezed in to get a couple shots with my puny Sony Nex, and we took off.  What a difference compared to Delicate Arch, the difference being a little more hiking distance.

Anyhow good article with very good point.  Almost made me feel guilty to have enjoyed those roads so much, lol. I will post video of the trip in a new thread.

PostedDec 13, 2015 at 7:53 am

Perfect topic for me right now!

My until-recently-very-active mother has been quite sick for the past year, and basically can’t really walk very far anymore.  She so badly wants to visit Arches/Canyonlands/Zion in the spring and I’m trying to plan a family trip there…so for us, we actually need roads with minimal walking (she could probably walk about 1/2 mile – hopefully by spring she could up it to 1 mile!)

I’m currently working on a plan for us (5 adults 1 toddler) to spend a week or so out there – find a cabin close to something, then do drives to various places to see things.  Renting a Jeep or similar would also be something she’d like….

Anyone have any suggestions of how you’d plan a trip like this?  It kind of hurts me to not be able to get out and away from the roads, but to get my mom out there to see this stuff before she leaves this world is going to be amazing!

Thoughts from those of you who know the area well???

 

Dennis Lee BPL Member
PostedDec 13, 2015 at 10:29 am

Hi Jennifer,

Ahh your post brings back memories as Arches and Canyonlands were our last real outing with my mom after she became weak.  Actually my kids were toddlers too and we had them on our back. As the OP mentiined, Arches can be seen in less than a day, and same with Canyonlands unless you guys want to venture out a bit.  I think if you just stay on paved roads and hit the view points, it will leave you wanting more.  We recently came back from the area and did White Rim Trail on a jeep, on top of visiting a few famous spots.  We did it in just over 3 days but if you spend 4-5 days, it would be perfect. White Rim Trail was nothing technical, just a bit hairy in a few sections if you are afraid of heights. You would need 2 jeeps which you can rent from Moab. Maybe one 2 door and one 4 door. Or any 4×4 with low gear will do. White Rim Trail was fantastic, being non technical, yet offered complete backcountry experience.  The views were amazing.  Not sure about spring condition, but I imagine it will be even better. Gopro really doesn’t do justice, but I did post a video in this section on a new thread if you want to check it out.

If you run out of things to do, there is Kanab which is also our favorite playground on a jeep.  Let me know if you have any questions!

 

George F BPL Member
PostedDec 13, 2015 at 8:36 pm

Hi Jenn,  a couple of thoughts:

All the desert parks in Utah are different and worth seeing. While you are in Moab seeing Arches and Canyonlands /Island In The Sky don’t miss Dead Horse Point state park. Moab itself can be a zoo with all the outdoor recreation going on there; jeeps, dirt bikes, mountain bikes, rafting, and everybody coming back into town to drink beer and brag at the end of the day. Depending on your budget there are some nice places to stay out side of town proper. We have been to Pack Creek Ranch a few times and are spending New Years there, quiet guest cabins up in the hills where Edward Abbey used to visit. Zions as about 5 hours from Moab so you will  be moving and not seeing it out of Moab. Be sure to drive Hanksville/Torrey/Boulder and not the interstate to get there and stop at Bryce Canyon NP on your way. While longer hikes are, of course, great, all these parks can be very rewarding as drives with short walks to vistas. Even if your mom isn’t walking much she won’t be disappointed. Assuming you would be flying into Salt Lake your drive times would be just under 4 hours to Moab, just under 5 to Zions.

Tom Clark BPL Member
PostedJan 24, 2016 at 1:13 pm

I explored Arches & Canyonlands in ’93 with my brother, then returned in 2012 with my family.  I was amazed at how much Moab grew and got commercialized…I hardly recognized it.  Nice article.

Tom

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
Loading...