Topic

Canister vs Esbit

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
PostedAug 14, 2015 at 6:44 pm

I have used Esbit for years but was intrigued by the weight of the BRS-3000T stove and the longstanding claim that canisters can meet or exceed Esbit weight efficiency if used efficiently. I have now tested this in real world Sierra conditions on two trips this summer, with high altitude, cold stream water, some wind, etc. and it turns out that the 110g canister can indeed get water as hot as a single Esbit can, 16 times. The weight of the 110g canister plus stove is 8oz, and the weight of 16 Esbits plus holder is 8.5oz. So the weights are essentially the same, with the oft-stated caveat that the empty canister weight remains as a weight penalty for the last few days, which I can live with. I only use two boils a day, so for 8 man days of boiling I will in the future go with the canister; for less days, maybe not.

BTW, in the various accounts of canister vs Esbit, it has probably has been mentioned but I have not read it before, the canister is capable of getting the water hotter than the Esbit, if you desire. This particularly helps with difficult-to-hydrate stuff like pasta, but can also make coffee too damn hot!
esbit

PostedAug 14, 2015 at 8:14 pm

Good post Cameron.
The canisters are certainly more efficient.
But on 2 to 3 day SUL trips it sure is nice to only pack 6 Esbits (3 oz) instead of 8 oz for the can and stove.

Man that BRS-3000T really is a beautiful work of art though.

Bob Moulder BPL Member
PostedAug 14, 2015 at 8:18 pm

OK for longer trips, but for shorter trips the weight penalty is unspent fuel plus the ~100g weight of the empty canister.

It's going to take some very careful planning and fuel management for optimal efficiency with canisters. And while it's not a huge deal, on the last day you'll be carrying an extra 100g, with your "break-even point" relative to weight having come after only 7 boils (100/14) with Esbit.

PostedAug 14, 2015 at 8:24 pm

"the canister is capable of getting the water hotter than the Esbit, if you desire."

I'm sure I'm missing something somewhere, but boiling water will be the same temperature regardless of the heat source.

A canister is quicker to reach boiling?

I assume esbit Will bring that same amount of water to a boil?

Bob Moulder BPL Member
PostedAug 14, 2015 at 8:30 pm

What is the volume of water you're boiling?

I regularly bring to a rolling boil 3 cups of water with one 14g tab…

PostedAug 14, 2015 at 8:49 pm

I never thought about having to pack out the empty canister weight.
I quit using the cans years ago.

Below freezing temps never effect Esbits and they take up a lot less space.
I also cut the cubes in halves and quarters because I usually only boil 12 oz of water. Then I only need 7 to 10 grams of the hexamine, depending on the wind. Of course a Ti stand and alu windshield adds .8 oz.

I do think you can get water to boil faster with the canister though.

PostedAug 14, 2015 at 9:51 pm

I can never get the water to the same "rolling boil" with the Esbit as with a stove, and there is definitely a temperature difference. The stove-boiled water can and does deform my plastic cup; the Esbit boils never do. I get the feeling that the surface area temperature loss of the 700ml container begins to compete with the slow speed with which the Esbit can crank it up.

Knowing the number of canister boils, there are some longer hikes where I may want to supplement my canister fuel allowance with only two or four Esbits. So it does not have to be an either / or situation. And yes, if I only need ten boils on a hike, I don't want to carry the extra weight of the canister plus unused fuel, not to mention accumulating another less useful canister for my closet.

Bob Moulder BPL Member
PostedAug 15, 2015 at 5:28 am

Here is the set-up I use to boil 3 cups with Esbit.

I’m using a 3-cup Open Country hard-anodized aluminum pot, MYOG pot stand, BGET Esbit tray (without the “legs”) and aluminum windscreen. It achieves a full boil that continues for about 2 minutes.

Dale Wambaugh BPL Member
PostedAug 15, 2015 at 7:44 am

I dont worry about the fuel/weight efficiency issues between these two stove types, but more about convenience. Canister stoves are hot and quick, Esbit rigs are compact and light. If camping with a group, a canister can crank out lots of hot water in a hurry and everyone can carry a can (and empties). Esbit with a Ti wing stove and foil windscreen is great for solo overnights or day hikes with a small mug.

If you dont mind waiting, Esbit is reliable. It wont leak, plug up or get cranky in the cold. There are the fire restriction issues.

Bottom line, I want both in the gear locker.

Edward Jursek BPL Member
PostedAug 15, 2015 at 8:52 am

For me, on short SUL trips I am now going with no cooking. On my longer 4 to 7 day trips, with only one boil per day (dinner), nothing beats Esbit. However, like Dale said, if I am hiking with one or both of my daughters and cooking for all of us, I take my MSR Pocket Rocket for its pure speed. The Pocket Rocket is also my car camping stove of choice.

PostedAug 15, 2015 at 7:15 pm

I also like the convenience of being to do some other things (safely) while waiting for the boil with Esbit. If I take an extra minute to get back to the stove, no biggie, but with a canister I feel I need to be there to babysit it so as to not waste any fuel.

Brendan Yeager BPL Member
PostedAug 16, 2015 at 7:25 am

Esbit is much more travel freindly (you can take it on a plane). I like to get in quick 1-3 day trips while traveling for work. Before switching to Esbit I would need to go out and buy a new canister for a handful of boils. On the bright side some people were lucky enough to find nearly full fuel canisters waiting at a trailhead.

Jerry Adams BPL Member
PostedAug 16, 2015 at 7:38 am

uh oh, your link is broke. It said "my compass is broken". Very clever.

and your technique for cold weather is good. I've tried it before and will refine it a bit this winter.

PostedAug 16, 2015 at 10:42 am

Pasta is difficult to rehydrate? Must be a new version of pasta that I haven't tried.

PostedAug 16, 2015 at 10:49 am

Most of the rice pastas rehydrate well just sitting in hot water.

Also, Barilla Tortellini (wheat flour) is ready after soaking for 15 minutes.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
Loading...