Topic

what’s the deal with upf shirts?


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) what’s the deal with upf shirts?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1328556
    Justin Baker
    BPL Member

    @justin_baker

    Locale: Santa Rosa, CA

    The patagonia capilene 1 base layer (polyseter) has a high upf rating and it's very breathable, you can blow air right through it.

    Columbia nylon button shirts also have a high upf rating but they aren't breathable at all. Trying to blow air through them is almost like trying to blow air through a wind shirt.

    What's the deal here? Why is it that polyester base layers can have a high upf and high breathability while nylon button ups with high upf aren't very breathable? They are both plastic fibers so I would think that it would depend entirely on the fabric weave.

    #2196556
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    As a Celt, I've got very sun-sensitive skin. I've gotten second-degree sunburns (blisters, plasma oozing through the skin for days afterwards) at elevation before there were good, moderately water/sweat-proof sunscreens.

    I've never gotten a sunburn or even any detectable sun exposure through any garment, SPF-rated or not.

    The deal with SPF-rated shirt, IME, is that ALL shirts are SPF-plenty. Like all vegetables are "cholesterol-free".

    #2196592
    Justin Baker
    BPL Member

    @justin_baker

    Locale: Santa Rosa, CA

    Yeah, I am skeptical about spf shirts as well.

    My main question is why nylon button ups aren't breathable but polyester base layers are breathable, even though they have the same spf rating. I'm assuming a high spf ratings is due to a very tight fabric that doesn't let sun in.

    #2196593
    Ken Thompson
    BPL Member

    @here

    Locale: Right there

    Fiber thickness and density of weave?

    #2196594
    d k
    BPL Member

    @dkramalc

    Some UPF shirts, at least the ones I've been getting, have zinc or titanium oxides in the fibers that they are woven from, which is what gives them a higher UPF rating (not the density of weave). Since UVB causes sunburn but UVA does not, maybe it's possible that regular clothing blocks UVB but not UVA (as does glass, which is why you won't get burned even if the sun is shining in your car window). UVA causes not sunburn but deeper damage, and is thought to lead more to skin cancers.

    #2196631
    Greg Mihalik
    Spectator

    @greg23

    Locale: Colorado

    I am not a "physical chemistry" guy, but poking around shows that nylon just does not stand up to UV very well.

    It degrades quicker than other synthetics, cracking and getting brittle. So my guess is that to make a shirt, you have to "over engineer" it with a tighter and heavier weave.

    Also, it does not hold dye very well, which means it is difficult to "add in" stuff that could further absorb UVA and UVB, so making it thicker and tighter is the direction you have to go.

    #2196637
    Ben C
    BPL Member

    @alexdrewreed

    Locale: Kentucky

    I think the woven nylon shirt has plenty of SPF too; they just haven't paid to test it or didn't think it was important for marketing to list SPF.
    As to breathability, a knit shirt is going to be more breathable than a tightly woven shirt.

    #2196663
    Dale Wambaugh
    BPL Member

    @dwambaugh

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    I think the companies listed build the shirt first, then drag the UPF rating in as an added benefit. IMHO, the nylon button down shirts are designed more with durability in mind. All my button down shirts are far more breathable than a windshirt, but nothing like a wicking base layer.

    Consider polyester dress shirts for outdoor use too.

    There are companies making sun protection clothing and their designs center on full coverage features like tall collars and neck opening gussets— and vents to make up for the hotter full coverage designs. The fabric seems to be rather ordinary outdoor stuff. I havent seen anything with titanium oxide additives, which sounds interesting.

    A UPF rating of 30 means that with 30 units of exposure, 1 unit gets through. That comes out to 97% coverage.

    And of course there is a Wiki on this:
    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_protective_clothing

    #2196666
    Owen McMurrey
    Spectator

    @owenm

    Locale: SE US

    "The deal with SPF-rated shirt, IME, is that ALL shirts are SPF-plenty."
    Wishful thinking. Having lived on the Gulf Coast as a kid, I've seen plenty of people sunburned through shirts, particularly thin light-colored ones. Was still surprised just now when I googled, and found this quote.

    "Think that T-shirt protects your kid from UV rays? Think again. A white T-shirt has an SPF of about 7, but once it gets wet, SPF drops down to about 3, according to the Skin Cancer Foundation."

    Edit: Looking around out of curiosity, and found this, but I'm not curious enough to follow the link and start looking up clothing items…
    chart

    #2196668
    Woubeir (from Europe)
    BPL Member

    @woubeir

    Euh, the term is UPF. SPF is only used for sun tan lotion.

    #2196672
    jscott
    BPL Member

    @book

    Locale: Northern California

    I'm glad that DK mentioned the difference between UVA and UVB. You don't have to get a sunburn to damage your skin. I had to have a cancerous melanoma sliced out of my cheek and so I've become a bit soap boxy on this subject. On the subject of car windows blocking out rays: There's an interesting photo on the internet of a long haul driver's face. The left, window facing side is completely saggy and sun spotted. The right side is much more normal. The point is that all car glass doesn't protect you from potentially damaging rays, even if you don't burn. You can look up your car model and find out about the kind of glass in your windows.

    Hiking at elevation really increases the intensity of the sun's rays. And no, cotton doesn't do a good job at blocking sun rays. This, according to the dermatologist who sliced me up. He's not in the pockets of the nylon-medical-industrial complex. I think that it's worth doing some research and getting a good sun shirt and hat.

    #2196674
    d k
    BPL Member

    @dkramalc

    http://www.coolibar.com/mobile/custserv/custserv.jsp?pageName=suntect

    Here is a listing of the various fabrics used by one company.

    Those of us that have had skin cancers removed tend to look a little more deeply into the subject of sun protection…

    #2196675
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    Isn't the UPF rating for the fabric? Doesn't account for how well the shirt covers your neck or arms or anything?

    I don't think anyone will wear their shirt enough hours for it to be degraded by UV, so nylon is fine. If you have a tent out for an entire summer in the sun (or a boat cover or awning or whatever) then UV resistance is important so nylon not so good a choice.

    A mesh shirt or really thin fabric you can see through won't offer much protection, but a typical shirt for hiking is probably good enough.

    Even a UPF rating of 7 would be fairly effective. A lot of the time I'm in the shade – trees, or resting. 15 minutes of exposure is a good thing, so UPF 7 would be 2 about hours in the sun. And 30 minutes or an hour of exposure isn't that bad. Long days at altitude with no shade, Sierras for example, then UPF 30 is good. Or if there's a lot of snow reflecting the light.

    #2196705
    Todd T
    BPL Member

    @texasbb

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    "Think that T-shirt protects your kid from UV rays? Think again. A white T-shirt has an SPF of about 7, but once it gets wet, SPF drops down to about 3, according to the Skin Cancer Foundation."

    That statement, at least without any qualification, is distinctly at odds with the table shown below it in Owen's post. I take it with a huge grain of salt, like most everything that particular Foundation says. If that statement were true, we wouldn't have terms like "tan lines," "farmer's tan," or "redneck" in our language.

    Here's another one from their website:

    "Who Should Use Sunscreen?

    Anyone over the age of six months should use a sunscreen daily. Even those who work inside are exposed to ultraviolet radiation for brief periods throughout the day, especially if they work near windows, which generally filter out UVB but not UVA rays."

    Source: http://www.skincancer.org/prevention/sun-protection/sunscreen/sunscreens-explained

    They actually say that *everyone* should wear sunscreen *every day* even if they are indoors all day because–horrors–some buildings have windows. That borders on asinine and leads me to almost dismiss everything they say. I give them the same deference I give to the nutrition "experts" who, after two decades of telling us to get the fat out of our diet, are now having to watch the health disaster that is 20 years of insulin spikes. If I were a betting man, I'd wager that slathering 3 oz (the Foundation's approximate recommendation) of sunscreen on your skin 365 days per year will ruin your health a lot faster than the moderate amount of sun you'll get just by not living underground.

    #3558089
    tom c
    BPL Member

    @teepee

    zombie thread, but it should be added.

    The chemistry of Polyester results in strong absorption in the UV spectrum.  Nylon and other fibers do not exhibit this.

    Of course, thickness and density of weave are critically important as well.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...