Topic

Just tried all new Arctryx footwear – thoughts

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Gary Pikovsky BPL Member
PostedApr 10, 2015 at 9:11 pm

Trying out a gear review entry for an upcoming SUL blog I'm working on. What do you all think?

First impressions: Arcteryx new footwear

In the summer of 2014, the buzz read: Arcteryx is entering the footwear market. In the technology world that would be like… Apple… umm… designing a… watch. Crazy. Crazy amazing? Crazy, i.e., too much of a good thing? A company known solidly for its outerwear going into the unknown?

Enter spring 2015. Boston's Tannery got a good-sized shipment of dead bird's new footwear line today. So I went over and spent some time testing the brand new low cut Acrux and high top Bora hiking boots. The verdict? It's a thoughtful (almost academically so) and ballsy first try. The bad news: read on.

First, the colors. These are just spectacular. The red is good. In fact, so freakishly good it would fit better in the halls of MoMA than an outdoor gear shop. It could redefine the Canadian flag itself. The additional, meticulously matched hues of browns, deep greens and even deeper blues work together in a wheel of Bahaus-worthy color harmony.

The removable liners are the most comfortable things I've tried on my feet in more than three decades. Only home cotton socks come close second. Walking in the insulated, low and high liners feels like your foot just met a soulmate. No pun intended. It's foot heaven.

The spoiler.

All is well in the cosmos until you decide to put those heavenly liners back inside the Arcteryx mothership. (aka, the outer boot). This unfortunate act teleports you straight down to the purgatory. The GoreTex membrane-covered liners and the tank-like outer shells seem like they have been designed by two countries at war. (The shells were hand-crafted by Putin.) The toe box is tiny, the fit is just plain bizarre and they actually FEEL like a dead bird while walking.

For overall fit, the Bora high tops are way better than Acrux lows. Bora's genius detail is in its ankle fastener. It locks your foot not just in one, but two spots – the ankle and the shin, much like a good, used hockey skate would. However, that same locking mechanism is also what feeds the fires of the purgatory – it strangles the ankle like a vice each and every time. In their current state, these boots would be great for a less than a 50 yard walk in pretty much any natural or unnatural environment. Mars included.

In conclusion, get the liners separately. Avoid the boots. Insert the liners into your favorite upsized trail runners (innov8 Roclites for me) and double duty them as camp shoes. Then, wait for the 2.0. These are not ready for human consumption just yet. But your kids are gonna love them.

PostedApr 10, 2015 at 11:24 pm

I wore a pair of the Bora2 (boot-height, removable liners) on two occasions around in my local backcountry shop for about 20 minutes each time trying to convince myself that the footwear I had so eagerly anticipated since they were announced weren't total turds. I'm still not convinced.

They fit me okay as long as I went down a half size from my normal boot size so that the removable/floating liner would not wad up above my toes and feel like my socks were slipping off. Once laced up they were okay, but no better than okay. I mean they cost $320 and they don't fit any better than $100 boots. They are billed as having "approach shoe agility with mountaineering boot support and protection." Well, they are nice and flexy, so they got the approach shoe part right, but the mountaineering boot claim is completely absurd. I own a number of pairs of 'light' mountaineering boots (Scarpa Charmoz, La Sportiva Trango Alp, La Sportiva Cube GTX, Garmont Tower, Mammut Monolith, etc), and the claim that the Arc'x Bora2 boots is anything in this category is farcical. They are day hikers, and maybe light backpacking boots, but no more. I was incredibly disappointed that they didn't make them more supportive. No, I'm not the type to wear trail runners doing 500 miles across AK. I actually like stout boots, and these ain't that. For the price, I expect a hell of a lot more like liners that actually work with the shells- not against them, and shells that don't flex and bulge in odd ways like they are some sort of prototype mockup.

I really wanted them for cross country packrafting adventures. Get some neoprene socks/liners for paddling and swampy portages, and then switch to dry gore liners for hiking. I may still try a pair from a place with a liberal return policy, but my hopes for these things aren't really high right now.

PostedApr 13, 2015 at 9:06 am

Can the GTX-liners be used seperately with other shoes, like GTX-socks ? And how is the fit for wide feet because the Rocky GTX-socks are too narrow for my feet to even put them on.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Loading...