Topic

Esbit burner testing


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Esbit burner testing

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 907 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2192076
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    Under calm conditions, I'm able to get consistent 2 cup boils using the 10cm Imusa Mug and 3 four gram esbits. Starting water temps at 70 degree.

    #2192135
    Eric Blumensaadt
    BPL Member

    @danepacker

    Locale: Mojave Desert

    As mentioned here in a few posts,

    1.The DISTANCE of the ESBIT flame from the pot bottom is important for maximum efficiency.

    And also
    2. The SIZE of the pot (i. e. amount of wear to boil) also greatly affects boil time.

    3. The SHAPE of the pot (i.e. wider than it is high) is important as the ratio I just described had been proven to be the most thermally efficient.

    4. The SHAPE of the "wind screen" (i.e. Caldera cones have proven to be the most efficient)

    5. Finally the "JUICE RESERVOIR" of the BEGIT tablet holder permits the liquid ESBIT residue to be retained for burning, almost doubling burn time.

    So I think I may have found the "sweet spot" for these parameters.

    My CC Sidewinder stove is sized for a 3 cup Open Country anodized aluminum pot/lid. Using a BGET tablet holder on the included small aluminum ground base seems to be the optimum height for the ESBIT flame. I can easily boil 3 cups of 50 F. water in 8 to 10 minutes, depending on ambient temp., using one tablet. For longer burns I use two tablets side-by-side, such as cooking spaghetti noodles or other pasta, heating reconstituted DIY dehydrated spaghetti sauce and for frying omelets and pancakes. (Yes, I do actually cook with my ESBIT stove.)

    So size of stove and amount of water to be boiled are important variables with ESBIT stoves. And using some kind of ESBIT holder (BET or pop can, etc.) that contains the liquid residue for burning greatly affects tablet burn times.

    BTW, see my recent post about the WalMart mini skillet that nicely fits this size stove.

    #2192209
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    Eric, I agree it's all about pot size and the containment of the melted esbit juice….and the use of some kind of windscreen.

    I have a Caldera Cone made for a 12cm aloomeenum mug. The mug has a capacity of 4 cups. Tomorrow I'll see what kind of performance it gets with a 14 gram esbit and the BGET tray. I suspect it will easily boil the 3 cups. As KJ said in another thread, one of the cones has a distance of 2" pot bottom to ground? My cone has that dimension also.

    #2192736
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    I put together a quick stainless steel stove to include a modified BGET tray. 3 cups of tap water(did not take temp reading) in a 12cm Imusa mug, in my garage under calm conditions, I boiled the 3 cups easily with a 14gr esbit. No windscreen. After reaching a boil, it seemed like it continued to boil for at least 3 min. I had just made the SS stove so I wanted to test the draft and flame spread.

     photo SS esbit stove_zpsnvgv0oda.jpg

    Stove weighs 33gr

    Height is 2.5"

    Only soot was deposited on the bottom of the pot…no gooey stuff. Soot easily wipes off.

    #2193028
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    I did 7 boil tests today using esbit in the BGET Brian Green Esbit Tray. I used a 32 ounce Conquistador pot in the Trail Designs Caldera Keg-F system. The supporting ridgeline positions the pot 1-3/4" from the ground. The BGET sits on the ground. Starting water temperature was 55 degrees out of the tap. I have well water. A slight breeze in my garage for all tests. I used 1 full size 14 gram esbit and one 4 gram esbit. All 7 tests produced a boil and continued for at least another 2 min. I boiled 4 cups every time for the 7 tests. The BGET esbit tray works really well in a cone

    #2193103
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    The BGET tray I used was a modified one that had the "bread pan" corners.

    It was Rod Braithwaite that came up with the idea of using "bread pan" corners when making a BGET. See his comments:

    http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/forums/thread_display.html?forum_thread_id=99066&startat=20

    #2193327
    Bob Moulder
    BPL Member

    @bobmny10562

    Locale: Westchester County, NY

    Good tests, Dan, and right in line with what I found using Esbit in the field for the first time this past weekend.

    Using the FF14/CC/Evernew 1.3 above I also got 4-cup boils and then some even in somewhat windy conditions. No doubt, the cone setups really are superior no matter what fuel tray is used. I don't know the start temperature of the water, which I got from a stream.

    Nice to know that I've got this option that solidly meets my 4-cup requirement. I recall reading some folks' comments about the stinky/messy aspects of the system but I found them very minor and hardly noticeable. I simply scraped the bottom of the pot on some sand and put the burner bits in a little snack-size baggie — good enough. I could live with this.

    #2199298
    Jameson Tisch
    Spectator

    @jameson_tisch

    So I have been playing around with multiple esbit stoves using the 4g tabs. Unfortunately, the BGET does not easily fit (2) 4g tabs as shown. The BGET was made by Zelph.
    bget

    The Tri-Wing esbit stove will fit (2) 4g tabs ONLY if brand new as shown. My used Tri-Wing stove had too much residue buildup from prior use that did not allow for (2) 4g tabs to fit. Further cleaning will need to be done on that one.
    triwing

    So what I did with some scrap titanium foil (which Jon from Flat Cat Gear graciously sent me a while back so big thank you to him) from a failed attempt at making a BGET the first time was really quick I set out to make a BGET that fit (2) 4g tabs. Now, I did not measure anything, take my time, or put much effort into making it look "pretty". I will be the first to admit that it certainly was not put together well nor did I try very hard on it as I figured it would mainly be a prototype. I eyeballed up (2) 4g tabs and bent some titanium foil and this is the outcome.
    2bget

    It will definitely work and the titanium foil is much more stiffer than the stainless steel foil I believe Zelph uses giving me the impression it could be slightly more durable – for what its worth. Here's some comparison shots.

    esbit
    esbit2
    esbit3

    I just got one of Jon's DIY Focus Fire stoves that I still need to put together in my quest of esbit testing so I'm looking forward to that!

    #2199302
    Aaron Sorensen
    BPL Member

    @awsorensen

    Locale: South of Forester Pass

    Any reason why you used the sizing with the esbit flat instead of on it's narrow sides together?
    Seems like that may get a better burn from it?

    I to will be making the same set-up as you with my lighter system.
    Just need to get the tabs and make everything.

    Nice!

    #2199303
    Jameson Tisch
    Spectator

    @jameson_tisch

    No there was no particular reason behind it. My initial assumption is that you would get a hotter, faster burn leaving more esbit exposed while on its side while as laying them flat as I had would give a longer, slower burn but I have no testing to support that claim.

    Definitely an interesting idea and I will have to run some tests with the cubes configured both ways and report back. I'd like to see your setup once you get it made.

    #2199406
    Bob Moulder
    BPL Member

    @bobmny10562

    Locale: Westchester County, NY

    Jameson, were you using a windscreen?

    Even when it's not windy a windscreen helps to channel the hot gases closer to the pot, leading to increased efficiency.

    The caldera cone is IMO best in this regard because it is the most efficient when it comes to channeling the gases and having them "dwell" longer on the pot sides, and the lower intake vents and upper exhaust vents are sized and positioned perfectly for taking advantage of low flame velocity burners such as Esbit and alcohol.

    It is a bit premature for me to reach this conclusion, but from my limited testing with the CC I'm starting to think that it almost doesn't matter what burner is used as long as the flame height is correct.

    #2199413
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    The Brian Green esbit tray seems to retain the necessary heat to consume the entire esbit whereas my Esbit Tri-Wing always has a waxy glob remaining.

    #2199792
    Eric Blumensaadt
    BPL Member

    @danepacker

    Locale: Mojave Desert

    This thread warms the cockles of my ESBIT-loving heart. IT is to me what alky burner posts are to alcohol burner fans.

    We are discovering the ins and outs of ESBIT burners for max efficiency and applying that info to our own stoves, whatever they may be.

    CHIVE ON ESBITers!

    #2199797
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    Are you saying that Esbit warms the cookies in your heart?

    –B.G.–

    #2199799
    Bob Moulder
    BPL Member

    @bobmny10562

    Locale: Westchester County, NY

    Hmmm… I think I might agree, but first I've got to google "cockles"

    Must be okay, though. The "auto-censor" didn't scrub it.

    #2199803
    Aaron Sorensen
    BPL Member

    @awsorensen

    Locale: South of Forester Pass

    All wee need now is to find someone with a smaller Caldera Cone system that can get 2 cups of water to boil from a two 4-gram BGET style burner.

    They can go against all other systems to figure out which can get a quicker boil (if at all)
    Then we can find out if the caldera is the true winner in efficiency.

    Of course a wide 1.3L pot may boil the water, but that is not what we're after.
    I'm willing to bet a better assessment of the hight, reflection and thermal efficiency will be a must to get a boil.

    #2199810
    Bob Moulder
    BPL Member

    @bobmny10562

    Locale: Westchester County, NY

    Of course a wide 1.3L pot may boil the water, but that is not what we're after.

    Well, okay, some of us aren't and some of us are. :^)

    The Goldgear.com "Fanatic" 700cc kit at 2.66oz for Esbit looks pretty good, but probably too heavy by your standards.

    Not a criticism and not meant to be snide in any way… just that IIRC you glued together some cans to make a pot for a HUL setup (I doubt seriously I can take credit for coining a term, but let's call it "hyper-ultralight").

    I require only a garden-variety UL setup with some durability because it's just me and the dog and we might do 20 miles on a good day.

    #2199814
    Cayenne Redmonk
    BPL Member

    @redmonk

    Locale: Greater California Ecosystem

    With a stock caldera gram cracker and cone, I have never had a trouble getting two boils per regular tablet in typical sierra water. This is pretty standard, no ?

    I'm confused about the improvements gained from using two smaller tablets. Is this mostly a win for people who don't want to carry a half used esbit tablet for whatever reason ?

    #2199815
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    The Esbit standard is to boil 16 ounces of water using one 14-gram cube. Wind, water temperature, and other minor factors are poorly defined.

    –B.G.–

    #2199824
    Aaron Sorensen
    BPL Member

    @awsorensen

    Locale: South of Forester Pass

    Willie
    Good point.
    I would just rather use the 4 grams due to less smell from them due to the way they are packaged.
    Plus the whole point is to get it to boil with two 4-gram esbits.

    Bob
    I have a great setup I use but even it is so over kill for it's use.
    I still need to get some food grade high temp sealer for the inside for the seam of the 2-1 can pot.
    I'll also take the inner coating off before putting everything together.

    And why not?
    It's very strong.
    Much stronger than the 2 cup Fosters Pot and 1.4 times lighter.
    20 grams = 0.7 ounces.
    It severs the purpose I need it for and it's 3.75 times lighter than the Fanatic 700.

    If I could do something like this to every piece of my gear (going the homemade version), it would be like going from a 14 pound base to a 10 pound base.
    It's for this reason that almost every item of my gear is homemade.

    #2199833
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    "It severs the purpose I need it for"

    I haven't severed anything in a long time.

    –B.G.–

    #2200066
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    Aaron, let's re-write the standard for esbit. Three 4 grams esbits to boil 2 cups of water.

    Oops, I'll be back LOL

    #2200070
    rmeurant
    BPL Member

    @rmeurant

    Locale: Laniakea

    The severity of the servitude serves the severance…

    #2200071
    Jameson Tisch
    Spectator

    @jameson_tisch

    Has it been concluded what the actual necessary amount of esbit is needed? (Assuming not a Caldera Cone which may or may not increase efficiency indefinitely)

    Nobody seems to be able to get a boil of 2 cups of water with 8 grams. Obviously the starting temp of the water plays a huge factor BUT (big but with no definitive answer) generally what is needed? Will 9 grams work theoretically? Will 10 grams do it if you use 2.5 cubes? It seems everyone has had success with 12 grams so obviously the minimum is somewhere between 8 and 12 grams to use no extra fuel.

    #2200076
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    Bob had stated the 16 grams was standard. 3 four gram esbits are plenty for 2 cups.

    Having photo upload problems. Will be back.

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 907 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Loading...