Jagged rocks and enormous boulders lay scattered throughout the forest, hidden under the shelter of autumn’s fallen leaves. Each step felt as if a needle was penetrating through the frail soles of my raggedy turquoise trail runners. Up in the vibrant blue sky, the sun smiled radiantly upon my friend and me as we trekked through a short section of the Pennsylvania Appalachian Trail. Our goal was to hike thirty miles in three days on the AT, from Delaware Water Gap to Wind Gap, a stretch that is beautiful but brutal as hell.
Pennsylvania was a state that scared me because of all the banter regarding how horrible the rocks are, but I needed to have the mental challenge to prepare myself for my winter AT thru-hike. Embracing the suck is exactly what I did, and I leaped for joy when a change to rockless terrain offered relief. There were numerous challenges while hiking the second day—the water source was turned off at Kirkridge shelter, rocks were in great abundance, and sweltering humidity drained us all.

Music played through one headphone in my left ear as I sang along merrily down the trail with not a care in the world. I felt ready to take on the last six miles of the day. Everything in the forest was blissful, from the sleepy rhododendron to the pincushion lichen flourishing down below—and then it all flew away in the wind. Out in the distance, I noticed a lanky white man who appeared to be in his early thirties, standing behind a tree. As we started to walk by him, my energy did a full 180. Dark energy invaded the atmosphere like a pack of vultures on a fresh kill; shivers ran down the ridges of my spine.
Followed
“A—r—e you guys ….thru-hiking” he stammered, nearly unable to stand. His knobbly knees could barely support his muscular body. He swayed back and forth like an old tree waiting to crash to the Earth. Billows of smoke dissipated in the air, but there was no scent to be found. Marijuana was not his choice of substance, but he definitely appeared to be on something.
A long navy-blue duffle bag lay in his hands, similar to a punching bag. There was no gear that indicated that he was a hiker. Great. I turned to my friend and noticed the orange Garmin device on her backpack, and I sighed. At least we had that option. I was hoping not to communicate with this man, but I knew to engage in conversation and look him in the eye, let him know that I did indeed see him. My friend gave a firm, “yes” and we kept walking.
We looked at each other and knew it was time to hike at substantial speed with a sense of urgency. We knew that was our best chance. We had no wish to confront a man who might be under the influence of drugs.
I assumed my friend was no stranger to this event; neither was I. This is the narrative of many women who hike and camp alone or in a pair. Our biggest fears are not bears, venomous rattlesnakes, or disease-carrying ticks—it is men. This excerpt from a 2017 Outside Magazine poll will be eye-popping to male readers but unsurprising to female ones. “Fifty-three percent of respondents said they’d been sexually harassed while recreating. Of those, 93 percent have been catcalled, 56 percent have been followed by someone (by foot, in a car, or on a bike), 18 percent have been flashed, and 4 percent have been attacked.”
The poll goes on to say, “when asked if you’ve ever felt afraid for your safety while recreating, 66 percent said yes. What are you most concerned about when it comes to safety? Thirty-four percent said “men” or “getting assaulted/harassed.” “Bears” came in second with only 12 percent.”
Men. Men like this one, lurking behind a tree like a mountain lion.
There were no weaknesses here. For one, I had my dog, who would have gladly defended me, and secondly, we were two very well-prepared ladies. I learned a few self-defense moves and how to attack with gear items such as a trowel and trekking poles if need be. One of my good friends taught me to always walk through the forest with my head up, always be aware of my surroundings, and greet everyone you pass for identification and intimidation purposes. No creep wants to be identified and looked in the eye. They want you to be oblivious. These types of men are like black bears. They want an easy meal, not one that is going to put up a fight. They want to claim the power.
Adrenaline does something spectacular to the body in which you become almost superhuman. I had no idea how fast I could walk over a sea of rocks up and down the mountain until I had to.
Every time I turned around, he was still lurking in the distance, staring straight at us. I stared back at him because I knew that showing fear, no matter how scared I was – well, fear wasn’t an option. After half a mile we finally lost him. We took a breath of fresh air after what seemed like an eternity. Our minds seemed to have blurred the events of what just occurred, and we could barely recall any of the terrain we had just traversed over. For a moment in the forest, we did not care about the naked trees, autumn’s vibrant leaves, or the warm drops of sweat running down our faces. We only cared about our safety.
Over the summer, I had thoroughly read about the twelve murders that had occurred on the Appalachian Trail. Googling safety on the AT became a sort of an obsession as I wanted to be prepared rather than scared.

Two Worlds
As a Black woman in the forest, my safety is my utmost concern as racism does not end on the trail. Being a woman comes with baggage that I wish we did not have to carry. Being followed, strange men walking into camp, and inappropriate comments are beyond frightening, and my incident is not isolated. These traumatic events prevent or discourage women from hiking or camping alone due to concerns about men preying on them.
Over the summer I hiked with women from a northern New Jersey hiking group who have expressed great concern about their safety while hiking. They have called me brave for trekking alone. It burdens my heart that we live in a world where women’s biggest threats are men. We have to take precautions and be vigilant no matter where we go in fear that a predator could be lurking around a tree waiting to attack. When we tell others we are hiking alone, their responses are “Really? You’re going alone,” or “You should bring a strong man along to protect you.”
Yes. I am going alone. I do not walk in fear, though at times I am afraid. I carry weapons for my protection, and I am learning self-defense. Carrying a Garmin InReach, SPOT, or other GPS tracking device along with a knife-necklace, mace, bear spray, etc., can offer a great sense of protection not only for women on the trail but also loved ones back at home. It shouldn’t be this way, but it is.

Every step in the forest is a mindful one. Little changes and knowledge can make potentially life-threatening interactions much safer, and I encourage women hikers to learn as much about self-protection as they can. And I encourage white men to listen to my voice, share this article with other white men, and have hard conversations with peers. I want the predominately white, predominately male world of backpacking to understand that it is different for people who aren’t white or male.
It shouldn’t be this way.
But it is.
Related Content
- Shilletha Curtis is a 2020 Backpacking Light Diversity Fund grantee.
- Read Ryan Jordan’s interview with Shilletha here.
- Read Ryan’s essay On Racial Justice and Protecting Intimacy Between Humanity and Nature
- Backpacking Light is part of the In Solidarity project. Read about it here.

Discussion
Become a member to post in the forums.
There has been at least a few occasions here on BPL when I’ve been scolded for pointing out the dangers of women hiking alone. The implication was that I was exaggerating and making the risks out to be greater than they really are. So when I read an article like this I’m a little surprised.
I totally agree with Herman E however, I don’t see how race has anything to do with it. Kind of seems like backpackinglight is trying hard to be inclusive by putting out a woke piece which attempts to highlight the social injustices taking place out on the trail. Oh the sexism and racism, etc, etc. Give me a break. Fact is that women have been in danger in isolated environments for thousands of years. Doesn’t matter what part of the world or what culture. It’s reality. We can talk about how men need to behave more like gentlemen until we’re blue in the face, but will it produce any change? No. A large percentage of men are pigs….worldwide!
Mace, self defense training, and a concealed .380 ACP with training and practice are real world protections against attacks. But the mace needs to be in your hand when coming upon someone questionable. I know it shouldn’t have to be that way, but living in a Disney fantasy world will only make it more likely that you’ll become a victim.
I’m a stealth camper because I don’t want anyone to know where I’m sleeping, which by the way is the time when you’re most vulnerable. But of course many people will imply you’re a paranoid nut job for wanting to be a stealth camper.
I do not agree that I have gotten huffy with you on any point; confused, yes, but even so, I have made an effort to politely ask you questions, understand your perspective, and analyze what you’ve said from my own perspective before responding. I’ve even attempted to keep things somewhat light-hearted; I’m not sure how that’s come across as huffy, but I apologize if you’ve gotten that impression.
To address your question: I have seen the movie…and it’s a hell of a film, in my opinion. Well-directed, well-acted, and eminently deserving of the cult status it has obtained. I also think that it’s a suspenseful crime drama that relies on a complete suspension of disbelief in order to work, because it is in no way a reflection of our society as a whole, which is both understood and accepted when we watch it. Thus, when you cited the “everybody’s got a gun” line, your comment seemed to be directed at the literal text of the line itself, and not the obviously-fictional setting of the film. Thereafter, I asked why you didn’t want to live in a situation where everyone had a gun, because it seems rather obvious that people simply owning guns does not create a criminally-populated nation of distrustful, paranoid murderers. Objectively, it seems that if more people legally secured the means to defend themselves in whatever way they felt comfortable, the number of violent crimes committed against those people would diminish.
Perhaps it’s easier if I replace the seemingly-hot-button “gun” word with another defensive device. Would you be uncomfortable in a world where everyone had pepper spray, or where everyone was a skilled practitioner of a martial art?* That’s not a rhetorical question: I would really like to know.
Thanks, by the way, for your time in answering, even though we seem to be somewhat at cross purposes.
*- Quentin, if you’re reading this, I want a co-author credit on the film.
Wasn’t there a quote about mice trying to negotiate with owls? Something like “Mice regard the ways of owls as wrong; owls regard mice as dinner.”
Solid point about sleeping; that’s not one that I usually consider, since I’m a light sleeper…but I should really think about that.
I admittedly like a brightly-colored tent – there’s nothing better in a storm, except hotel room service – but you’ve got me rethinking it, now. A couple of my sketchier encounters have happened right after setting up camp for the night, when I was busy with dinner and absent-minded. I wonder if a duller tent would have made me less visible… 🤔
Shilletha, thank you for sharing your story with us.
I prefer dark earth tones and camo tents/tarps for stealth, but to go off topic a bit, also because they are aesthetically unobtrusive and not bright garish colors that look unnatural and out of place in the wilderness.
And…you’ll probably think I’m paranoid…but ever since I started doing long solo treks I always carry at least one piece of brightly colored gear (according to the NHTSA the most visible is bright yellow with lime green panels), sometimes even just a 3′ square piece of fabric, in case I have to hit the PRB and the rescue helo needs to be able to spot my location.
There are grains of truth in most of the comments to this article, but it seems to me that social media commenting has become an easy way to ignore the need to change ourselves. Tell the female hikers, my fellow male hikers, what changes you have or will make to “help make it as safe for Shillethal as it is for white males like me”. That quote is from Brad H whose comment was one of the few that spoke a deeper truth. GK
That’s not paranoia, in my opinion; it doesn’t fit the definition of the word. I would call it simple prudence, and it seems like a very reasonable action. I’ll have to consider that, as well. Good tip.
There is another side to that question: barring such institutions as representative government, why is it required of one specific subset of the population to enact changes on the behalf of any specific other? That sort of action can quickly turn into a dangerously double-edged sword.
Also, is the original question an open one, or rhetorical? Rather, does it anticipate one desired answer, or are individual and variable answers permissible? For example, could an acceptable answer be: “I’m willing to vote for all black females being issued a handgun, given a concealed carry permit, and given free training in how to use their handgun safely”..?
In what way? What makes this particular point deeper, in your opinion? Where do you consider the other viewpoints to have failed in their depth?
“why is it required of one specific subset of the population to enact changes on the behalf of any specific other?
I can’t speak to all the ways in which this is being called for but I find it belittling and a way to keep us in our place. It stems from the belief that we are not capable of shaping our own lives, our interactions and our relationships.
Just be decent. Most people on the trail are that or better.
. Girls Fight Back: Yes! I’m Hiking Solo .
^^^ this! More of this please.
Thanks @annapurna
Not about self defense but a good read She Colors Nature: Diversify the Outdoors .
That’s a good resource; I’m going to pass that along to several of my acquaintances. Thanks!
“If he was however, intoxicated, that demonstrates unsafe behavior.”
“Not necessarily; that’s the basis behind legally-permissible amounts of alcohol in one’s system, among other things.”
I consider intoxication to mean beyond legally permissible amounts of alcohol. If someone is not legally safe to drive, carry a firearm or look after kids, they are not safe. If someone on the trail is visibly intoxicated, they are not safe to themselves or others. That guy doesn’t get a pass from me. If you are off to the woods to enjoy your whisky and pistols, don’t be anywhere near anyone else.
JS- “I don’t want to live in that world”
But parents still have to instruct their kids about how sometimes the world IS like that and what they need to do to stay safer. Denying someone the ability to keep themselves from harm because it doesn’t measure up to someone else ideal utopia is—.
Classic ways to stay safe when traveling include :
check the weather forecast, travel in groups, talk to the locals about safe methods and routes, carrying defensive weapons and survival gear, be aware of other people and surroundings, have plans and training for any emergency you can “what if?” brainstorm
Sounds reasonable, although I would clarify that in many states, any amount of alcohol in one’s system makes carrying a firearm illegal. But yeah, I personally agree with you on that definition.
Or better yet, leave one of them alone while you enjoy the other.
Great article Shilletha, although some here have openly stated they would rather that you not tell your story; I’m glad you did. Share more, please, despite the mansplaining. This group needs to hear from you.
As to the comment “Why judge him like that?”- women get one chance to make that decision, and if it’s the wrong one… Yes, sometimes we have to be too quick to judge, in order to survive. No need to ever apologize for that.
Once I made my presence known, vehicle drove up within a few feet of my tent and threw a beer at me that almost hit me in the head. Zero cell service, limited escape routes.
I have had similar once. my wife and I AND baby were hitching back from a very ‘outback’ trip and ran out of daylight, so we camped in a clearing off the road. Late that night a ute with drunk teenage males turned up and put their headlights on our tent. We did not like that.
So I crawled out of the tent to say hello. I was wearing just my underpants at that stage, but I was holding a large heavy machete in my hand (days before UL you see). My wife thought I looked intimidating. . . .
They quickly left.
Women are not the only ones who can have problems.
Cheers
I’m having a lot of trouble finding these instances: can you please quote/cite them?
I’m also having trouble finding these instances. As I understand it, “mansplaining” is the act of a man condescendingly or patronizingly explaining something to a woman; I’ve seen a lot of men sharing or explaining the male perspective of both the article and the following commentary in both general and personal ways, but I haven’t seen anything that easily meets the criteria for “mansplaining.” Can you please direct me to these instances, as well?
I do not understand why there is a division being made on the base of sex, here. Saying that “women get one chance to make that decision” is technically true, but it is also very misleading: men have the same minimal timeframe to make the same basic and vital decisions in moments of crisis. Furthermore, in some ways men see just as much risk as women, insofar as violent crime is concerned. As Roger just said:
Although most of our research points towards a disproportionate female bias in sexual assaults, worldwide, men comprise nearly 79% of all homicide victims. Even in a comparatively safe place like the AT, the male/female murder bias is – if my memory serves – about 50/50. I mention this not to detract from the reality of sexual crimes being directed towards women, but rather to draw attention to the fact that the escalation of force knows but little of any distinctions between the sexes; usually, the only dividing line is the manner is which the violence is perpetrated.
In general, I would agree that there is no necessity for a person to apologize for making reasonable decisions to ensure their own safety; I do not agree, however, that such permissions apply explicitly to women, and I would argue that an act of absolution based on sex is not only an act of discrimination, but prejudiced sexism. What are your thoughts on this point?
Camped in the Lander park between guide trips. It was a regular stop for the BikeCentenial riders to stay on their way across the country as well as dirt bag climbers on their way to the Winds. The locals on Friday would come to the park and drink beer and throw the empty bottles at the nearest tents. I always slept cowboy far in the back to avoid attracting the attention of the yahoos. One night I couldn’t sleep so I walked around the park and up to where the beer drinkers were hanging. They saw me, offered me a beer. Nothing personal I guess.
Also in Wyoming have been threatened with a big stick by a drunk when camping alongside the road with a dozen grade school kids. When my two buddies crawled out of their sleeping bags, the drunk’s partner got scared and pulled him back into the car and took off.
Was shot at near Cheyanne, camping on a backroad. A truck roared up on a rise and shined it’s headlights on us, then started shooting. We jumped into my pickup and took off.
Something about Wyoming people and a dislike for campers.
Or maybe Wyoming just has a disproportionate number of angry drunks.
Margaret Atwood > Quotes > Quotable Quote
“Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them.”
Become a member to post in the forums.