Jagged rocks and enormous boulders lay scattered throughout the forest, hidden under the shelter of autumn’s fallen leaves. Each step felt as if a needle was penetrating through the frail soles of my raggedy turquoise trail runners. Up in the vibrant blue sky, the sun smiled radiantly upon my friend and me as we trekked through a short section of the Pennsylvania Appalachian Trail. Our goal was to hike thirty miles in three days on the AT, from Delaware Water Gap to Wind Gap, a stretch that is beautiful but brutal as hell.
Pennsylvania was a state that scared me because of all the banter regarding how horrible the rocks are, but I needed to have the mental challenge to prepare myself for my winter AT thru-hike. Embracing the suck is exactly what I did, and I leaped for joy when a change to rockless terrain offered relief. There were numerous challenges while hiking the second day—the water source was turned off at Kirkridge shelter, rocks were in great abundance, and sweltering humidity drained us all.

Music played through one headphone in my left ear as I sang along merrily down the trail with not a care in the world. I felt ready to take on the last six miles of the day. Everything in the forest was blissful, from the sleepy rhododendron to the pincushion lichen flourishing down below—and then it all flew away in the wind. Out in the distance, I noticed a lanky white man who appeared to be in his early thirties, standing behind a tree. As we started to walk by him, my energy did a full 180. Dark energy invaded the atmosphere like a pack of vultures on a fresh kill; shivers ran down the ridges of my spine.
Followed
“A—r—e you guys ….thru-hiking” he stammered, nearly unable to stand. His knobbly knees could barely support his muscular body. He swayed back and forth like an old tree waiting to crash to the Earth. Billows of smoke dissipated in the air, but there was no scent to be found. Marijuana was not his choice of substance, but he definitely appeared to be on something.
A long navy-blue duffle bag lay in his hands, similar to a punching bag. There was no gear that indicated that he was a hiker. Great. I turned to my friend and noticed the orange Garmin device on her backpack, and I sighed. At least we had that option. I was hoping not to communicate with this man, but I knew to engage in conversation and look him in the eye, let him know that I did indeed see him. My friend gave a firm, “yes” and we kept walking.
We looked at each other and knew it was time to hike at substantial speed with a sense of urgency. We knew that was our best chance. We had no wish to confront a man who might be under the influence of drugs.
I assumed my friend was no stranger to this event; neither was I. This is the narrative of many women who hike and camp alone or in a pair. Our biggest fears are not bears, venomous rattlesnakes, or disease-carrying ticks—it is men. This excerpt from a 2017 Outside Magazine poll will be eye-popping to male readers but unsurprising to female ones. “Fifty-three percent of respondents said they’d been sexually harassed while recreating. Of those, 93 percent have been catcalled, 56 percent have been followed by someone (by foot, in a car, or on a bike), 18 percent have been flashed, and 4 percent have been attacked.”
The poll goes on to say, “when asked if you’ve ever felt afraid for your safety while recreating, 66 percent said yes. What are you most concerned about when it comes to safety? Thirty-four percent said “men” or “getting assaulted/harassed.” “Bears” came in second with only 12 percent.”
Men. Men like this one, lurking behind a tree like a mountain lion.
There were no weaknesses here. For one, I had my dog, who would have gladly defended me, and secondly, we were two very well-prepared ladies. I learned a few self-defense moves and how to attack with gear items such as a trowel and trekking poles if need be. One of my good friends taught me to always walk through the forest with my head up, always be aware of my surroundings, and greet everyone you pass for identification and intimidation purposes. No creep wants to be identified and looked in the eye. They want you to be oblivious. These types of men are like black bears. They want an easy meal, not one that is going to put up a fight. They want to claim the power.
Adrenaline does something spectacular to the body in which you become almost superhuman. I had no idea how fast I could walk over a sea of rocks up and down the mountain until I had to.
Every time I turned around, he was still lurking in the distance, staring straight at us. I stared back at him because I knew that showing fear, no matter how scared I was – well, fear wasn’t an option. After half a mile we finally lost him. We took a breath of fresh air after what seemed like an eternity. Our minds seemed to have blurred the events of what just occurred, and we could barely recall any of the terrain we had just traversed over. For a moment in the forest, we did not care about the naked trees, autumn’s vibrant leaves, or the warm drops of sweat running down our faces. We only cared about our safety.
Over the summer, I had thoroughly read about the twelve murders that had occurred on the Appalachian Trail. Googling safety on the AT became a sort of an obsession as I wanted to be prepared rather than scared.

Two Worlds
As a Black woman in the forest, my safety is my utmost concern as racism does not end on the trail. Being a woman comes with baggage that I wish we did not have to carry. Being followed, strange men walking into camp, and inappropriate comments are beyond frightening, and my incident is not isolated. These traumatic events prevent or discourage women from hiking or camping alone due to concerns about men preying on them.
Over the summer I hiked with women from a northern New Jersey hiking group who have expressed great concern about their safety while hiking. They have called me brave for trekking alone. It burdens my heart that we live in a world where women’s biggest threats are men. We have to take precautions and be vigilant no matter where we go in fear that a predator could be lurking around a tree waiting to attack. When we tell others we are hiking alone, their responses are “Really? You’re going alone,” or “You should bring a strong man along to protect you.”
Yes. I am going alone. I do not walk in fear, though at times I am afraid. I carry weapons for my protection, and I am learning self-defense. Carrying a Garmin InReach, SPOT, or other GPS tracking device along with a knife-necklace, mace, bear spray, etc., can offer a great sense of protection not only for women on the trail but also loved ones back at home. It shouldn’t be this way, but it is.

Every step in the forest is a mindful one. Little changes and knowledge can make potentially life-threatening interactions much safer, and I encourage women hikers to learn as much about self-protection as they can. And I encourage white men to listen to my voice, share this article with other white men, and have hard conversations with peers. I want the predominately white, predominately male world of backpacking to understand that it is different for people who aren’t white or male.
It shouldn’t be this way.
But it is.
Related Content
- Shilletha Curtis is a 2020 Backpacking Light Diversity Fund grantee.
- Read Ryan Jordan’s interview with Shilletha here.
- Read Ryan’s essay On Racial Justice and Protecting Intimacy Between Humanity and Nature
- Backpacking Light is part of the In Solidarity project. Read about it here.

Discussion
Become a member to post in the forums.
Companion forum thread to: Followed in Plain Sight
Shilletha Curtis recounts a harrowing encouter and invites the reader to see the world through her eyes.
Hike on, Shilletha! You’re a very very brave woman. I remember a drunk man shouting at me across the street, “Go back to where you belong”. And a girl at a café kept skipping me and kept taking orders from people behind in line (she was people of color, too, which made it hurting more). Learned to live with it and these experiences can only make us stronger. Looking forward to read more articles from you! Happy trails!
More male backpackers should support female backpackers and consider that things are much different for our coumterparts. I look forward to more of your articles.
I always wonder where these douches/creeps hang about, and how they get far into the back country and are high or drunk.
Sorry ladies. about half of men are pigs and the other half of us are decent but even some of them are probably racist too. Please know the rest of us are as abhorred by this as you (but we dont have to suffer their wrath so its not the same at all).
White (mostly male) privilege is real. I’ve never been harassed in public, threatened, told to go back to my country, had slurs hurled at me for no reason, etc. and wish all people were treated based upon their own actions. Im weird and do weird things and am sure people think I am, but at least no one harasses me about it.
My wife is pretty normal and does totally normal things and is told inappropriate things all too often (from both men and women, though most often white women, which she is too. Karens seem to discriminate against all people, but especially non-whites. at least women aren’t typically physically threatening)
Everyone should have dignity and respect afforded to them until they prove they are unworthy of it. Also, let this be a reminder that We should fear bad men, but what we should fear even more is the indifference of good men. (substitute ‘people’ for ‘men’. its my favorite line from the Boondock Saints opening scene). If you see something shady happening, feel free to pipe up people.
On a related note a this mace is carried by the police in many areas and only weights 64g. Its a decent insurance policy against 2 and 4 legged critters. Make sure you have a mace with at least 1% Major Capsaicinoids if ordering something else.
https://www.copquest.com/first-defense-pepper-spray-13-mc-mk-6-canister_42-2450.htm
Good article, Shellitha. thanks for posting it. Let’s hope that at least a few people who need to hear this message get it from your work!
Thank you Shellitha. It shouldn’t be this way, and those of us who are able should have to the courage to everything we can to change it.
As lightly edited to be genderless, I have always been inspired by the following (I wonder if it inspired Boondock Saints?):
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.” ― Edmund Burke (in a letter addressed to Thomas Mercer).
And:
“Whilst people are linked together, they easily and speedily communicate the alarm of any evil design. They are enabled to fathom it with common counsel, and to oppose it with united strength. Whereas, when they lie dispersed, without concert, order, or discipline, communication is uncertain, counsel difficult, and resistance impracticable…When bad people combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”
–Edmund Burke, Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents 82-83 (1770) in: Select Works of Edmund Burke, vol. 1, p. 146 (Liberty Fund ed. 1999).
As a male geezer I always carry a medium sized lock blade knife and sometimes bear spray her in the mountain west. The bear spray is mainly for bears and cougars.
But yes, women backpacking solo, or even as a female couple, are vulnerable to violence on the trail. My 2nd time on the AT mybudd and I were in the Shannandoah National Park was when two women were killed. Their dog survived.
My buddy and I were questioned by Park rangers when we came off the trail for re-supply. The incident made even us, healthy men in their 40s, feel unsafe the rest of the trip. As far as I know the murderer was never caught.
5 shots of .38 special weighs 12 ounces. You are ultimately responsible for your own safety, especially on the mountain.
So, Andre, if a male’s behavior causes women to be terrified,. the answer is they have to carry guns. And if something happens at the hands of a male and a woman isn’t carrying, it’s her fault, right?
How about advocating for changing male behavior? Your response misses the point entirely. Actually your response is the classic male response that needs to be reconsidered if we’re ever going to get anywhere.
I’m male and hate guns. I would never carry one backpacking in particular and have never felt that I needed to. I feel perfectly safe hiking solo in the wilderness. I think Shilletha should be able to feel safe as well. Shilletha has every right not to be stalked (!) by some creep in the woods. How about standing up and agreeing to that. Call out the creep, don’t lecture Shilletha.
Thanks Shilletha for bringing this out into the open. I too carry a visible neck knife, an inReach, and a can of bear spray. I recently completed a long section of the PCT solo, and several men felt the need to comment on how they “never felt the need to carry bear spray.” I’m not afraid of black bears guys, and I really don’t need you schooling me on what you think I should carry! The statistics ring true – virtually all women have been harassed, and most of us have had creepy encounters. That being said, I’ve recently seen an unprecedented number of women backpacking solo or in pairs as well as more BIPOC folks on the trails. This is what’s needed to (re)claim the outdoor space for everyone!
Sarah
+1 with what jscott said!
Too bad people can’t enjoy a trail without less drama and potential crime. Lightweight gear allows hikers a means to get out of a situation though a persistent pest may need to be dealt with. Think before the recent AT murder of a 50+ year old thru-hiker may spur law enforcement to take threats more seriously.
That would worry me as well … and probably compel me to put some distance between me and that whole scene. Probably harmless with some sort of cooking fire, but better safe than sorry! The AT is reportedly near more population centers than the other long trails, so there may be a more “varied” population as homeless numbers climb, people get it in their head they can live off the land (well maybe some can but think they’d at least camouflage it so hikers don’t feel threatened… call the police).
I dislike doing so, but I feel that a few points need to be made, here:
This is a fallacious conclusion based on little but rhetoric. The quoted words are your words; not the other person’s, and little in what the other person said logically leads to what you said here.
Changes are certainly and absolutely necessary on some points of the behavior of some people, but outright dismissing one person’s solution or advice because of a personal disagreement with that solution is an act of both intolerance and aggression. Instead of listening to your interlocutor, you’ve marginalized him entirely; progress of any sort is not likely after an action like that.
It’s perfectly fine for you to like or dislike things as you feel directed, and to advocate for solutions along whatever lines you feel to be reasonable…but those rules also apply to others, and having a positive discourse that arises from those disparate perspectives is a far more likely road to systematic solutions than lecturing a person about lecturing others because you disagree with what they believe, what they said, or the way in which they said it. It is reasonable to say that all persons in possession of a social conscience are aware of the need for increased safety and equality in our interactions with others, but intentionally antagonizing those of different opinions retards the very progress that we all consider necessary.
Also:
This – this right here – bears a massive degree of consideration. Few people have put the entirety of the issue into such clear perspective with so few words: well done.
Pompous lecture concluded, flak vest donned, range established: fire for effect.
“5 shots of .38 special weighs 12 ounces. You are ultimately responsible for your own safety, especially on the mountain.”
Carry a gun, you’re responsible for your own safety. that’s the response to Shilletha’s article. I’m suggesting that’s a classic male response. I stand by my saying that it misses the point of the article. the article is trying to show a far too common occurrence for women. It’s trying to get people, and men in particular, to be aware. It asks for acknowledgement, as in, “yeah that’s terrible and I get it”. I think this last calls for a bit of understanding and empathy and self examination.
Instead, Shilletha is told to carry a gun and the problem’s on her to deal with. Again, I’ll suggest that men need to be the ones acknowledging this is OUR issue too. We scare women more than anything else in the wilderness. What will we do about it?
This may be akin to “being pulled over for driving while black”. Lots of white people simply don’t get that. Black people can’t get some to even acknowledge that it happens. Or, like here, the response is, well being pulled over for driving while black is just the reality and it’s on you to deal with it.
I think it’s on us to change. that’s a better response. Or at least conveys that the concern has been heard and is understood.
by the way, what if Shilletha doesn’t want to have to carry a gun? I certainly don’t.
all that said: I was probably too rhetorical as was suggested. I certainly am NOT attributing any bad behavior to (sorry I can’t see the name of the poster because I’m in a field that won’t allow me to see it.) I often post something specific that doesn’t take the broader context into account. sorry if that’s what happened here.
I have a daughter that travels alone and I worry. I want the world to be safer for her; I am also not going to wait for that to happen before I teach her everything I can about being safe; it would be irresponsible not to. That includes thinking about where she goes and what time of day; that includes being aware of men in the area, particularly young men ( of any race); that includes self defense classes and other defensive methods. There are platitudes about the world needing to be made safe and it’s a man’s responsibility to make it so and then there is the care and practicality of teaching our kids to navigate the world with their own safety in mind-at all times.
My post is not in reply to the write up but to the usual responses that boil everything down to gender and race.
But yeah, when I was younger I found myself in a few really scary situations involving men of varied demographics. I can relate about fearing for my life. It sucks.
It would be nice to set up a “safe culture” phrase that a guy could say when paths cross. Something that eludes to “hi, what a wonderful day, I’m here, but I’m also leaving your space.”
That is a better way of both examining and conveying one’s thoughts. I agree with you: the author should not have to resort to carrying a gun in order to secure her own safety…but it is an option that she has as much right to employ as any other citizen. That being said, it is on us – all of us – to effect decisive solutions that do not threaten lethal force, less we be left with fewer alternative options.
A mature, charitable and honest approach, that. Likewise, I apologize for having singled you out…but if both of our actions lead to better discourse and the both of us parting amicably, so much the better.
A reduction to the simplest values is often educational insofar as theory is concerned, but comparatively useless in the real world where the sheer number of exceptions and variables makes theoretical understanding almost meaningless.
I can relate as well, but as a male, my experiences that allow me to relate to your situation – and that of the author – are almost universally dismissed or marginalized by both men and women of all backgrounds. As a man, I am expected to be capable of “handling things” and exerting pressure on male society simply by nature of my chromosomal makeup. Naturally, this is as fallacious a conclusion as any other that comes from outright assumption, but irony, it seems, is not without a sense of vicious satire.
Passwords are wonderful things, until they are stolen; then they become access roads to all manner of misery…but I agree: it would be nice if we could do such a thing. In lieu of that, I would suggest a different approach: multi-layered security. On a societal level we must both educate, advance and correct…and we must correct heavily, if needed. On an individual level, we must proactively defend ourselves…or, phrased another way: we must accept that the most secure bank is the one that nobody wants to rob. Hobbesian, yes, but also effective; the rewriting of our social contract would do well to examine the idea.
@Andre we don”t need firearms on trails. We need men to stand up and understand what our counterparts are going through and support them..Look at sarah’s responce and waht she had to do on the PCT. The AT is just as bad with guys chasing girls in the trail…
That is a very effective solution for the majority of the population; social pressure and the desire to be accepted by other humans are quite good at reshaping the behaviors of people that haven’t yet bothered to do the same reshaping on their own…but nothing about the encounter that was described is indicative of a person that can be deterred or directed by an understanding and equality-supporting society. In fact, quite the opposite is true: the antagonist in that piece shows many characteristics of a person that is, at best, on the fringes of a society, and consequently not nearly as concerned with it as other, more functional people. This brings up an important question: how are we to address perceived threats when the threat itself is both unknown in terms of its origin, unpredictable in its motivations and actions, and possibly uncaring in regards to consequences? We know but little of what was happening with that particular antagonist: substance abuse or mental disability could have been as much in play as nefarious intent…and without knowing the cause and motivation of that person’s actions, we cannot simply pressure them to act differently. Social pressure is a tool for the sane majority: it acts on you and me and the masses because we can be reasoned-with, and if willing, we can understand the perspective of others and influence our peers to do the same. Social pressure does not work on those who no longer feel it as we do, so through no fault of our own – as evidenced by the author’s encounter – we may find ourselves in situations that no amount of societal solidarity can eliminate. What, then, are we to do? Personal preferences aside, we have as much of a right to defend ourselves as we have a right to not need to do so; the only logical solution, then, is to ensure that both rights are treated equally, and to ensure that we support our fellow humans as best we can regarding their decisions about personal safety.
What is wrong with empowering women to not wait for guys “to step up”( however you think that part is going to be achieved)? Why not teach our girls that they can make themselves safer regardless of what guys decide or don’t decide to do? Would that not send a clearer message to men, that we are not going to let this happen and if we need to be violent to prevent it we will?
Let’s work on creating a culture of safety and respect and let’s also make it clear that violating us will not be tolerated, not just in court, but right then and there. I am not advocating guns but suggesting that a woman take control of a situation in whatever manner she needs to is not putting the blame on her when things go wrong, it’s an overall message that we are done with it. Imagine being a predatory male reading this forum and hearing that women should not carry defensive tools because society needs to change…or hearing that, since we are physically more vulnerable, you should assume that in one way or another we are prepared to fight you off. I don’t need men to save me. I don’t need men to step up and start treating me right; I need them to understand that not doing so is not going to fly, period.
It is true that “human bears” are generally of greater concern than wildlife encounters. Of the (relatively small, yet tragic) numbers of murders on the AT, the majority have been targeted towards women and couples and have been near civilization (it would have been helpful if the article actually provided these statistics). However, I think it is inappropriate to single this out as a “women’s issue”. I have heard many stories on this site of individuals who have had harrowing encounters with other humans on the trail, and many of them do not fit the demographic of the author. I myself have had several. Once, will camped near a remote fire road, I was almost run over by individuals doing donuts in a clearing while drunk (or on drugs). Once I made my presence known, vehicle drove up within a few feet of my tent and threw a beer at me that almost hit me in the head. Zero cell service, limited escape routes. Another time, while I was working as a ridge runner near the Delaware water gap, I was persistently followed by a lonely individual, including waking up to them at the door of my tent before sunrise and anonymous letters being left on my personal vehicle at trail heads. It eventually ended with a state police investigation and the individual being banished from state lands. As a young male, I occasionally received overt solicitations from women while on the job. In our culture, I’m told that I should be complimented by such things, but that quite frankly strikes me as a double standard and inappropriate. The author is right in suggesting situational awareness and projecting confidence vs “victim”. However, while there may be somewhat greater instances of violence against women and minorities (what this discrepancy is should have been included in the article, especially given that this is science driven BPL), this situation can be easily applied to all of us (although I’m uncertain about the value of focusing on such things, given that the reality is that the outdoors is statistically safer for all demographics. I rarely share my stories because it’s easy for the inexperienced to get the impression that the outdoors is filled with danger. However, it is certainly worth discussing how we can ALL be and feel safer- be situationally aware at road crossings, careful about who you camp around, etc.). With a very broad brush, this article paints men (particularly white men?) in the outdoors as dangerous and venomous. If such is the case, it should be backed up with accurate statistics. Otherwise, such journalism perpetuates irrational fears that unfortunately break down relationships between all of us and build fear in a hobby where you are far more likely to die driving to the trailhead than to be raped or murdered. My personal experiences were harrowing and scaring, and I do not deny the real fear that must have been felt by the author; however, I think with a healthy dose of prudence we all can and should recognize the outdoors as a (relatively) safe space and avoid spreading fears. A small minority of men very well may be a threat to women out there. However, the overwhelming majority can also be the opposite: selfless protectors. I am confident that almost every man I have met on the trail would stand up for a women (or man) who felt unsafe. However, if the narrative of “men are dangerous” continues, it becomes increasingly likely that they won’t even be able to get close enough to be there in a time of need.
^^^ agreed.
You know that awkwardness when you end up leap frogging/following someone else on the trail and for whatever reason you can’t pass them? It happens all the time. It’s especially awkward when it’s a man following a woman. Nothing the man can do, other than to awkwardly smile and appear friendly (which may be interpreted as flirtatiously aggressive). Articles such as this reinforce the notion that the woman should avoid contact at all costs, when such situations can easily be disarmed by a simple “hello, you’re welcome to pass if you’d like!”, allowing both parties to go on with their day and hike at each owns pace
I would be interested to know exactly how many such encounters go entirely unreported amongst all demographics; that can never be known, but it would still be interesting to find out.
Nail on the head, Kat…nail on the head.
Become a member to post in the forums.