Black Packing Light
  • Sections
  • Today’s Features
  • Subscribe
  • Sign In
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • Email Newsletter
  • Membership Info
  • Articles
    • Recent Features
    • Gear Reviews
    • State of the Market Reports
    • Gear Guides
    • Gear Lists
    • Skills & Techniques
    • MYOG
    • Science, Technology & Testing
    • Stories
    • Calendar
  • Education
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
    • Masterclasses
    • Online Courses
    • Guided Treks
    • Education Portal
  • Forums
    • Forum Index
    • Recent Forum Posts
    • Gear Forums
    • Gear Swap (Buy/Sell)
  • Gear Recommendations
  • Gear Deals

Backpacking Light

Pack less. Be more.

You are here: Home / Blog / CrazyCap LED Water Purifier Review

CrazyCap LED Water Purifier Review

by Emylene VanderVelden on August 4, 2020 Blog, New Features

Introduction

The CrazyCap 2 ($59, 1.9 oz/56 g) is an ultraviolet water treatment device that takes the form of a bottle cap. At first glance, this little multi-use item seems like the perfect invention for ultralight backpackers on the go. But how does it perform in the field with its bottle compatibility issues?

 Crazycap 2 ultraviolet water treatment: crazy cap lid

The CrazyCap 2

The Test

Inside the box, I found directions, a warning about not looking directly into the UV light, an alcohol swab, a USB charger, and The CrazyCap 2. Aside from being double the weight (0.85 oz/24 g vs 2 oz/56 g) than a standard S’well water bottle, the cap is pretty similar to a standard S’well lid.

 Crazycap 2 ultraviolet water treatment: comparison of lid types

CrazyCap 2 compared to a Manna bottle standard lid.

The CrazyCap 2 lid requires a specific bottle format and you will require either a CrazyCap bottle, S’well bottle, or another similarly configured bottle. I used a Manna water bottle. I did find a cola style water bottle in plastic (2.8 oz/80 g) (also made by Manna), but because plastic has a different screw style than the stainless steel bottles, the CrazyCap 2 didn’t fit.

Touch once and the CrazyCap 2 lights up and give the battery status, touch twice and it does a normal sterilization mode (one minute), touch five times and it gives the crazy sterilization mode (2.5 minutes). Indicator colors red for less than 25% battery, orange for 25-50% battery, green for a full charge, and blue for sterilizing in progress.

The charge mounts overtop the cap and plugs into any USB port, including one on a laptop or battery pack.

 Crazycap 2 ultraviolet water treatment: Charging color of crazy cap lid

The CrazyCap 2 charging.

 Crazycap 2 ultraviolet water treatment: green light means fully charged

The CrazyCap 2 with a full charge.

 Crazycap 2 ultraviolet water treatment: blue light means purifying water

The CrazyCap 2 purifying water.

The Limitations

The Crazy Cap 2 is a neat product but is a limited use item for most ultralight or lightweight backpackers. The first obvious issue is that The CrazyCap 2 uses a stainless steel bottle which is heavier than most of us would be comfortable packing around if only to protect our “ultralight cred.” I’m all for finding little luxuries on the trail and if a stainless water bottle is yours, this is a fantastic product. For me, a fancy water bottle is definitely not one of my luxuries.

Second, the battery life on The CrazyCap 2 lasts about a week doing 5 batches of 17 ounces (0.5 L) or 85 oz (2.5 L) of water per day or 595 ounces (17.6 L) per week. This is great on a short trip with low hydration needs. However, on a longer trip, charging may be required, which therefore requires the addition of a charging pack (or two.) Obviously this is a limitation but not a real strike against The CrazyCap 2. If you are bound to using UV technology, battery life will be a constant factor. A Steripen Ultra has about 1,700 ounces (50 L) of water per charge or 170 ounces (5 L) per day for 10 days. The Steripen Ultra weighs about 4.9 ounces (138 g) vs CrazyCap 2’s 1.9 oz (56 g), but the Steripen Ultra also processes twice as much water per week and lasts an additional three days.

This brings me to my third point. After I started using hydration packs because I like them more than bottles, I didn’t use my Steripen Ultra very often. When I finally dug it out to sell it about 5 years after it had last been charged and put away, the battery was still at ¾ charge. The LCD screen still had its idiot-proof interface. I could use the Steripen Ultra instantly and explain how it works to the guy who bought it. The CrazyCap 2 was less intuitive, in that the button is glitchy with a 3-second delay between touching the button and it responding. The delay makes you second guess if you are using the CrazyCap 2 correctly. I found myself asking, “Is this thing even on? Or does it need to be charged again?” The CrazyCap 2 indicator colors (red, orange, green, and blue) all make sense, however, what it does not do (unlike the Steripen Ultra) is give a reading if the water is too contaminated or if the sterilization failed. The Steripen Ultra has a happy face, a sad face, an error, and a battery life indicator on its LCD screen, and its neoprene carry case has a definition for each icon.) A sterilization failure indicator seems crucial for any device you plan on using to keep you safe from giardia.

The CrazyCap 2 can be used multi-functionally for sterilizing other items, and this is good in theory. It’s true, a UV light can be used for sterilization, however, it is important to note that UV Sterilization only works if the light is not impeded. By not impeded I mean the surface has to be clean, with no particulates covering the surface. The requirement of surfaces to be clean is why hospitals don’t extensively use UV sterilization technology. This is also why cloudy water doesn’t work with a UV light, as the particulates block the light and the sterilization fails. In short, this is a great device if you know you have crystal clear water. UV sterilization is a recipe for disaster with cloudy water. With the CrazyCap 2 providing no notification it failed sterilization in cloudy water, it makes me wary of using it on long trips where I have questionable water sources.

Another potential issue is that CrazyCap 2 is relatively expensive. The cap itself is $59.00 plus a compatible bottle at $25.00 – $45.00. A Steripen Ultra is $110.00 and a Steripen Ultralight is $90.00. Having used both types of products, I would pick the Steripen Ultra. The Steripen Ultra can pretty much be used in any water bottle, and overall I found it more reliable than the CrazyCap 2.

My final issue with the CrazyCap 2 is this –  every time you fill the bottle in a water source, you have to sterilize the mouth of the bottle. The mouth of the bottle must either be sterilized before you screw the cap on so you don’t cross-contaminate the cap’s threads, or you must sterilize the mouth of the bottle every time you take a sip. CrazyCap provides one alcohol swab for this purpose. On a long backpacking trip, a single alcohol swab would be insufficient. Carrying one alcohol swab for every water bottle refill or every sip is impractical, to say the least. Therefore, you could use the CrazyCap’s UV rays to sterilize the mouth of the bottle but at a battery cost of 1 use per every 17 oz (0.5 L) of water sterilized, which cuts the battery life down to 3.5 days. The other possibility, of course, is to take a weight penalty and carry a small bottle of alcohol or bleach with a small cloth to wipe down the mouth of the bottle. Obviously, this is an issue with other UV systems as well, but the Steripen markets a bottle mouth cover for filling the bottle. This could be a solution for the CrazyCap as well but to my knowledge, no one is making a bottle mouth cover for cola style bottles.

Conclusion

I love the idea of the Crazy Cap 2, but its limitations concerning the bottle size and type mean that its functional use in my pack is limited. From an ultralight perspective, the best use of CrazyCap 2 is for a short duration trip with excellent water sources. I would gladly use the product for a mountain marathon where water sources are frequent and clean, gear is minimal, and the duration is short. At this time, however, the use of the CrazyCap 2 is primarily for people who have a sentimental attachment to a specific S’well style bottle regardless of its weight. If CrazyCap produces an ultralight bottle, or comes up with more universal designs, and addresses the mouth sterilization issues, then I can see greater use for this product in the future.

DISCLOSURE (Updated November 7, 2019)

  • Product(s) discussed in this article may have been purchased by the author(s) from a retailer or direct from a manufacturer, or by Backpacking Light for the author. The purchase price may have been discounted as a result of our industry professional status with the seller. However, these discounts came with no obligation to provide media coverage or a product review. Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for guaranteed media placement or product review coverage.
  • Some (but not all) of the links in this article may be “affiliate” links. If you click on one of these links and visit one of our affiliate partners (usually a retailer site), and subsequently place an order with that retailer, we receive a small commission. These commissions help us provide authors with honoraria, fund our editorial projects, podcasts, instructional webinars, and more, and we appreciate it a lot! Thank you for supporting Backpacking Light!
  • Read about our approach to journalistic integrity, product reviews, and affiliate marketing here.

crazycap 2, steripen ultra, steripen ultralight, tech, ultraviolet, water bottles, Water purifiers, water treatment

Get ultralight backpacking skills, gear info, philosophy, news, and more.


Comments

Home › Forums › CrazyCap LED Water Purifier Review

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
Forums are supported by our merchant partners (disclosure)
REI (Coupons) • ZPacks • Hyperlite • Patagonia • Arc'teryx • RBTR • Drop • Backcountry • Feathered Friends • CampSaver • Gaia • Mountain Hardwear
Gear Deals • Gear Search
Login to post (Basic Membership required)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Aug 4, 2020 at 12:19 pm #3668842
    Backpacking Light
    Admin

    @backpackinglight

    Locale: Rocky Mountains

    The CrazyCap 2 ($59, 1.9 oz/56 g) is an ultraviolet water treatment device that takes the form of a bottle cap. At first glance, this little multi-use item seems like the perfect invention for ultralight backpackers on the go. But how does it perform in the field with its bottle compatibility issues?

    • CrazyCap LED Water Purifier Review
    Aug 4, 2020 at 1:34 pm #3668861
    Eli N
    BPL Member

    @enaeher

    Interesting that there is no claim that you need to stir, shake, or otherwise agitate the water, as with the Steripen, to make sure that all of the water gets within range of the light.

    Is there some difference in the strength of the UV light, or is Katadyn just being more cautious?

    Aug 4, 2020 at 1:34 pm #3668862
    todd
    BPL Member

    @funnymo

    Locale: SE USA

    I really appreciate the way you highlighted the pros & cons!  Thank you.

    Aug 5, 2020 at 6:54 pm #3669311
    Sean P
    BPL Member

    @wily_quixote

    Locale: S.E. Australia

    Thanks for the review,

    Just a clarification, in the last photo you have the device purifying water – do you mean that it filters the water as well or did you mean sterilising?  The two are different processes.

     

    If a biologist with relevant credentials is handy I would be curious to know if it is actually necessary to disinfect the  bottle thread.  To my knowledge, getting ill from a waterborne disease requires a large enough pathogenic load, not a zero pathogenic load.  For example, our water supply in western countries is not free of pathogens, just has low quantities.

    My point being if the 1 litre of water is sterile but a small amount of contamination is gained from the bottle thread – is this sufficient to cause disease?

     

    On the steripen – I found it highly, highly unreliable,  Maybe an older model but it refused to work at times and last i read it was due to the two probes being wet (!) when using.  Anyway this seems like a positive step towards reliable UV water treatment so long as you can find a practical bottle to fit.

    Aug 7, 2020 at 12:43 pm #3669751
    Ryan Jordan
    Admin

    @ryan

    Locale: Central Rockies

    …if the 1 litre of water is sterile but a small amount of contamination is gained from the bottle thread – is this sufficient to cause disease?

    Infectious disease takes over in your body when replication of the pathogen inside the body overwhelms the immune system’s ability to eradicate it. That’s the general principle, although it’s more complicated than that of course.

    Think ‘whack-a-mole’.

    It’s easy to whack one mole that pops up now and then.

    It’s harder to whack 7 moles that are simultaneously popping up all over the place.

    So initial dose is important. If the initial dose of pathogens is low, the immune system can whack ’em.

    Same reason why wearing a face mask helps minimize the transmission of airborne respiratory diseases – they decrease the load of pathogens that can be transmitted to others.

    Back to the question.

    Is there a high enough “dose” hanging out in the threads of a water bottle to cause an issue?

    Depends on how contaminated the water is.

    For most backcountry mountain streams, I’d say no.

    If I was drinking out of a stock tank, I’d rinse the threads.

    Aug 7, 2020 at 12:55 pm #3669754
    Jon Fong
    BPL Member

    @jonfong

    Locale: FLAT CAT GEAR

    Interesting, I discuss this issue in another thread on the Larq water bottle.  We had a long discussion about this concept in my New Product Development and Ethic class.  The fundemamental problem is what is being claimed and how does the customer really use the product.

    The weak link in the design is that the dirtiest part of the bottle will be the mouth of the bottle where people’s lips will come into contact with the bottle.   That area is NOT exposed to UV light , it has to be cleaned by the customer.  Since there are metrics or verification that this occurs, what they can “claim” is pretty minimal.  The water in the bottle may become free of bacteria, however; you cannot say that the bottle is free of bacteria.  That would be misleading.  My 2 cents.

    Aug 7, 2020 at 3:11 pm #3669788
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    Doing a few measurements with my highest resolution scale, I can get about 0.2 grams of water clinging to a bottle cap.  A similar amount on the bottle’s threads, would be 0.4 grams total that would be un-treated by UV (or chemicals) in the main volume of the bottle.

    So 99.99% removal in a 1-liter bottle becomes 99.95% removal.  5x greater bacterial/viral dose.

    While 99.999% removal becomes 99.959% removal.  A 41x greater dose.

    Back when I was mostly using iodine treatment, after it was mixed, I’d crack the bottle cap and let halogenated water flush the threads so that it had the same exposure treatment time.  Why not?  It was quick and easy.  With UV treatment, one could 1) wipe the inner and outer threads dry to remove that small volume of water and/or 2) invert the bottle to flush the threads with treated water.

    Aug 7, 2020 at 3:27 pm #3669790
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    Pity they didn’t use a standard wide-mouth Nalgene 1-liter bottle cap as the basis of the device.  Not the most UL choice but far lighter than that SS bottle and vastly more common.  Or, better yet, something that could insert into a Gatorade, SmartWater or standard soda bottle thread.

    EliN: Yup, odd about the lack of instructions to agitate. An independent test of SteriPens in wide, middle- and small-mouth water bottles, with and without agitation found, “The SteriPEN® reached a mean reduction of more than 99.99% of bacteria and 99.57% of the spores when applied correctly. However, the results of the trials without agitating the water only yielded a 94.98% germ reduction.”

    Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789391500174X

    Aug 7, 2020 at 7:37 pm #3669811
    Rex Sanders
    BPL Member

    @rex

    Locale: Central California Coast

    The CrazyCap UV LEDs probably need a bottle with a reflective interior to achieve decent water sterilization in a reasonable length of time and energy use. Wouldn’t get that reflection in a standard plastic bottle. Maybe reflections make up for not stirring?

    UV LEDs still have a ways to go to match what Steripen does today with evacuated mercury-primed glass tubes.

    — Rex

    Aug 8, 2020 at 12:41 am #3669841
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    I thought shiny metal surface would bounce UV around like they do Visible and IR.  My BIL  (first person to entangle more than 2 photons and only to find an exception to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle; i.e. a guy who knows his photons) said, nope, very few surfaces would be reflective of UV-C.   I had asked about aluminum and SS bottles and (my SUL pipe dream) a potato-chip bag.

    His response in full:

    The steripen emits UVC.  It seems to peak at a wavelength of 254 nm, which is quite short.  Most materials will absorb this, not many will reflect it.  Any conductive material will stop strongly reflecting at sufficiently high frequency, related to the density of electrons in the material. This is why x-rays go through everything, including good conductors like aluminum.  Shorter wavelengths of course have higher frequencies, so materials (like metals) that are good and shiny for visible wavelengths may not be for UVC.  Here is some data from the Edmund’s Optics catalog:

    I would look at the “protected aluminum curve” and conclude that Al itself stops reflecting pretty close to the 254 wavelength.  You might find that it reflects a portion of the lamp’s output spectrum.  Note that the UV Enhanced Aluminum has a multilayer dielectric coating that is doing the reflection at the short wavelengths. not an option outside of optics contexts.  The potato chip bag is aluminized mylar, if I’m not mistaken.  I have no idea how much mylar is required to absorb UVC, but I would guess a double-pass through a potato chip bag would also cause a lot of absorption.  This is from a google images search.  Looks discouraging.

    You might, I suppose, get a decent reflectivity from undyed anodized aluminum.  The anodizing produces a porous coating of alumina, which has the same absorptive properties as sapphire, which is transparent down to 225 nm or so.  The multiple scattering in the alumina layer would reflect some of the light back, in the same way that snow reflects back visible light.  For your ultimate goal of providing safe water, however, the porosity of the coating might be a problem if it provides a home for bugs to live in.

    Aug 8, 2020 at 11:38 am #3669906
    Kevin Babione
    BPL Member

    @kbabione

    Locale: Pennsylvania

    My water purifier of choice is the AquaStar Plus – It’s a UV tube that fits on a standard Nalgene bottle:

    AquaStar Plus

    It uses 2 CR123 batteries and gives about 60 liters on a fresh set of batteries.  At 8.5 ounces (for the bottle, the UV tube/cap, and batteries) it’s the heaviest thing I carry outside pack/shelter/sleeping, but it’s worth it for me to get a liter of drinkable water in 80 seconds.

    Sadly, the company sold out to Camelbak so the AquaStar Plus is no longer available.

    Aug 8, 2020 at 8:47 pm #3670052
    Todd T
    BPL Member

    @texasbb

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    Call me a Luddite, but that thing looks absolutely useless.

    Aug 9, 2020 at 12:00 am #3670067
    Edward Barton
    BPL Member

    @porosantihodos

    Locale: Boston

    I wonder if an adapter to convert the threads on this to a lighter bottle could solve the issue of the contaminated threads. You could unscrew the cap/adapter combo from the bottle to add unsterilized water, and drink only from the end of the adapter that attaches to the cap.

    Aug 9, 2020 at 11:32 am #3670108
    Rex Sanders
    BPL Member

    @rex

    Locale: Central California Coast

    @davidinkenai thanks for the graduate-level education in UVC reflectiveness. IIRC, another UVC LED water treatment maker insisted that a reflective bottle was necessary, but maybe that was just marketing (photon) spin.

    — Rex

    Aug 11, 2020 at 4:19 pm #3670430
    Edward Barton
    BPL Member

    @porosantihodos

    Locale: Boston

    It turns out the s’well/manna cap fits very snugly into a Lifeway kefir 1L bottle (1.6oz with cap on my scale), though doesn’t screw on. When shaken hard, some tiny drops come out, but the cap stays firmly put. No water comes out if the bottle tips over. I wonder if this could be a reasonable solution.

    Dec 7, 2020 at 11:16 pm #3687748
    Emylene VanderVelden
    BPL Member

    @emylene-vandervelden

    I would suspect it would be workable solution, not ideal because it doesn’t seal but workable. I checked around locally and can’t get that brand of bottle so I can’t test the theory.

    I do try not to use single use plastics for my water because of the possibility of the plastic breaking down but that’s a personal choice on my part.

    As for the question of agitation, I thought the same thing but it’s not included in the directions. It’s either because the light is on longer or it’s related to the bottles reflectiveness as suggested. In the latter case, I suspect switching to a non-metal bottle would be no bueno. I have sent a question to the manufacturer and I’m awaiting response still.

    More or less, I stuck this little guy in my pile of failed experiments and went back to my favorite water treatment solutions (Platypus). Hence I forgot the check for questions till now… 😐 my bad.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Want outdoor gear and skills info you can really trust?

Get our Handbook - the resource you need to make intelligent decisions about gear, safety, comfort, and pack weight.


Today's Gear Deals

Guide’s Gear Recommendations

Find out what gear our guides recommend if you want lightweight gear that is durable and versatile.

guide's gear logo

Gear Recommendations

  • Publisher’s Gear Guide
  • Staff Picks
  • Guide’s Gear Recommendations
  • Our Lightweight Gear Recommendations for REI Members
  • Today’s Gear Deals
  • Search for Gear on Sale

Subscribe Right Now

Receive new Members-only content, gain access to 2,000+ articles in the archives, and become a part of the most passionate community of backpacking experts in the world.
Subscribe Now
  • Backpacking Gear Reviews
  • Backpacking Skills
  • Backpacking Trips
  • Backpacking & Outdoor News
  • Outdoor Recreation Science & Technology
  • Backpacking Courses, Webinars & Other Events

Follow Us

Get outdoor skills and gear info you can trust.

Download the Backpacking Light Handbook to help you make intelligent decisions about gear, skills, ultralight philosophy, and reducing your pack weight.

Join Now: Support fair and objective product reviews.

Something for everyone: Basic, Premium, and Unlimited Membership options available.

View Subscription Options

More @ Backpacking Light

  • About Us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise with Us
  • Write for Us
  • Submit a Product for Review
  • Diversity Grants
  • Help / Support / Contact
  • Terms & Policies

Call Us

Membership Sales & Support: 406-640-HIKE (406-640-4453) | About

© Copyright 2001-2021 BEARTOOTH MEDIA GROUP, INC. | U.S. Library of Congress Serial Registration ISSN 1537-0364
BACKPACKING LIGHT® and the FEATHER/MOUNTAIN icon are registered trademarks granted for exclusive use to Beartooth Media Group, Inc. Subscribe here.

  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • My Account
  • Forum Profile
  • Private Messages
  • Newsletters
  • My Course Enrollments
  • Unlimited Membership Portal
  • Help / Support / Contact