Topic
Canister Stoves
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Canister Stoves
- This topic has 51 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 3 months ago by Roger Caffin.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jan 29, 2019 at 1:50 am #3575585
I am looking at the MSR canister stoves, in particular the Pocket Rocket. There are two versions, the Pocket Rocket 2 which weighs in at 79 grams. The (new) Pocket Rocket Deluxe which weighs in at 89 grams. About the only difference I see is that the Deluxe has a piezo igniter. I know these igniters have a generally bad name. Does anyone have any experience with both the 2 and the Deluxe? Are they really that different? What, if anything, is there to recommend about one over the other? Thanks.
Jan 29, 2019 at 3:35 am #3575609I have the Pocket Rocket 2 – It’s a good product, how much does your remote ignitor weigh? I didn’t know there was a Deluxe until you posted. I just use a Bic Lighter or Flint from my survival kit to light my PRII.
Jan 29, 2019 at 5:44 pm #3575675I’m curious as to what has narrowed your choice to those two stoves.
Jan 29, 2019 at 5:58 pm #3575678I am also, Ken. There are quite a few other, better (IMO) canister stoves out there.
Jan 29, 2019 at 6:34 pm #3575685Lighter too.
Jan 29, 2019 at 6:36 pm #3575686Less tipsy too.
Jan 29, 2019 at 8:02 pm #3575701Am I alone in liking an igniter for 10 grams? Not having to dig the lighter out seems worth that weight.
Jan 29, 2019 at 8:34 pm #3575704I like piezo lighters. Soto stoves. It’s been working for a couple years.
For some reason, Pocket Rocket is not well liked on this site. I have one of the old models. It works fine. Pretty much the same as many other canister stoves. I don’t know if the piezo lighter works on the new Pocket Rocket model.
Jan 29, 2019 at 10:07 pm #3575721Jerry turned me on to the Soto Windmaster (I think that’s what it’s called). Great canister stove, it’s what I use now.
Jan 29, 2019 at 10:13 pm #3575722…Soto Windmaster…Great canister stove, it’s what I use now.
The Windmaster is my stove of choice as well. Light, yet sturdy and less tippy than most. The piezo has worked flawlessly for the 4 years I have owned it.
Can also be easily found for just under $65 right now. Worth it!
Jan 29, 2019 at 11:03 pm #3575733I think the main reason Pocket Rockets are so popular is that they are sold everywhere. Being under the giant Cascade Designs umbrella has advantages.
Jan 29, 2019 at 11:29 pm #3575735Maybe when Pocket Rockets first came out they were more unique?
Since then, a lot of stoves that weigh about 3 ounces?
Jan 30, 2019 at 12:07 am #3575741The new Pocket Rocket Deluxe has a regulator, meaning it can open it’s valve much wider, allowing greater flow with a lower pressure differential. This allows for good flow during cold weather, or when the canister is low, but restricts there being too much flow when the pressure differential is large. The Soto windmaster and many other cold weather canister stoves use this mechanism for cold weather operation. Plus, it looks like MSR ripped off the Soto Windmaster head design, for better wind performance. All in all, a pretty significant upgrade from the original.
Jan 30, 2019 at 12:16 am #3575743I don’t have either stove, but I’ve been waiting on the pocket rocket deluxe, because of it’s pressure regulator. It’ll help the caister perform more consistently at colder temps.
Looks to me like the pocket rocket deluxe takes some of the design elements from the Soto windburner.
Pretty similar designs as far as I can tell. Big stove test from bpl coming which will prob compare them both.
Jan 30, 2019 at 1:48 am #3575757Very biased opinion: the MSR Pocket Rocket is one of the worst designs available today. The flame is too focused (burnt dinner) and the pot supports are too long and thin – and bendy. And it is expensive.
My 2c.
Cheers
Jan 30, 2019 at 1:53 am #3575759Roger, just curious on your take for a good canister top stove these days?
Jan 30, 2019 at 3:02 am #3575781I just tried my new pocket rocket out last week on a 2 day trip. I was a bit disappointed . It boiled water wonderfully, loudly , and quickly. One of the arm supports is a bit week in the upright position . It actually failed a few times sending my water pot to the ground. I have since tried to tighten the screw. We’ll see.
Jan 30, 2019 at 3:36 am #3575786Hi Overshot
You could do a lot worse than a BRS-3000T stove, as long as you buy a genuine one. There are imitations on the web and reports have suggested that some of them are ‘not good’. Expect to pay in the range US$12 – US$15 from eBay.
Of course, the big Q is how do you tell a genuine from a fake/copy? The genuine ones look like this:
(pic taken from our review of the BRS-3000T at
https://backpackinglight.com/brs-3000t-review-caffin/)
Note especially the burner head and the pot support arms.Beware: there are plenty of fakes under that model name on eBay, but they look a bit different..
Then there is the Fire Maple FMS-300T stove, also on eBay, price US$35 – US$45, although there are plenty of vendors with higher prices. Buying one from an Australian retailer will cost you in excess of $100, which is why Aus retail is having such a hard time of it.
The FMS-300T is arguably better made, with brass thread at the base rather than anodised aluminium. Brass means the thread will last longer, although with gentle handling the BRS-3000T will last for a few years.The BRS-3000T is a bit of a cult stove here at BPL, being reasonably well made, working well, and being about the lightest and cheapest in that class. (The cheaper copies do not always work very well.) In fact, some hard-line BPL members have been known to buy 4 – 6 of them in one go to drop in various packs and ‘in case the production stops’. It is amusing that the cost of 4 off BRS-3000T can be less than the cost of 1 off brand-name (Western) stoves.
Example: the Olicamp Ion stove (US$60+) is exactly a rebadged FMS-300T.
Disclaimer: I have zero vested interest in any upright stove brands, although I do sell my own Caffin Winter Remote Canister Stove.
Cheers
Jan 30, 2019 at 12:21 pm #3575808When I went to purchase a new canister stove a few years ago I looked at the emissions data. I figure if there is less CO coming from the stove it is burning more efficiently, and saving fuel weight. Way better if you happen to be cooking in a vestibule too. That’s how I ended up with the Snow Peak titanium. To my amazement, I found you can actually simmer with this stove. It will turn way down.
The advantage of the stoves which perform better in a 30 mph wind is a trade-off for poor CO performance when it is calm.
Any stove performs best when the air is still, so it is well worthwhile to construct a windbreak if it is breezy. Also, best to keep it on the ground rather than on a table or rock. I believe the canister stoves are more efficient when run at lower temperature settings, so I am not too concerned with rocket fast boil times.
Jan 30, 2019 at 2:17 pm #3575819Most canister stoves burn fairly cleanly. Usually they have plenty of oxygen input and unrestricted output, so, only the fuel valve on stoves really does anything. (I am discounting various Reactor type stoves.)
Oxygen inputs or air vents are usually fixed at the factory. These are usually just drilled holes near the jet. As the jet passes by them it draws air in to mix with the flame. This usually means the air/gas mix is then passed through to the burner where it is distributed and burned. A simple arrangement, generally, that works pretty well.
But, what happens with wide burners and low fuel settings? Well, sometimes, it is possible for the mixed fuel to ignite too soon under these conditions. You might hear a pop and the fuel can burn in the burner rather than outside. Not a good situation. This can cause a lot of heating of the internal parts, any gaskets could melt, and the canister itself could overheat. Since this is a safety hazard, most manufacturers use smaller burner heads, insuring that this will not happen. It also means it is difficult to get a wide burner head to run at very low fuel settings.
Since the air intake is fixed (remember, they are simply a set of drilled holes) this means that overall pressure may be overly lean when the fuel is set at low settings. While fairly good at reducing CO emissions it also increases NO emissions (http://fluid.wme.pwr.wroc.pl/~spalanie/dydaktyka/combustion_en/NOx/NOx_formation.pdf) This is not much but as far as I know, no one has studied this wrt hiking stoves.
The excess of air will also reduce the heat output further…think of it as “diluting” the overall heat of the flame…increasing CO production at very low settings. It will have the same effect as flame quenching. You can see this by turning your canister stove stove down till it starts burning with yellow tipped flames. This can be delayed by removing some of the air input using a sleeve to block some part of the air inlet holes. In practice no one does this, so turning down the stove, till it just burns clean, is as low as it will go.
Jan 30, 2019 at 2:36 pm #3575821“The BRS-3000T is a bit of a cult stove here at BPL,”
I got one because it’s so cheap and lightweight – good as a spare. Works fine.
The reports of unreliability sort of turn me off. I don’t mind tinkering with things though, test it a few times first to make sure it’s not defective. Don’t run it at full speed so it doesn’t over heat.
The short stem makes it light weight, but because of that the valve will get hotter which might lead to unreliability.
If I buy a stove from MSR or Snow Peak or SOTO, the company will try to make reliable products for long term value of their name. If there are ten “BRS3000″s on Amazon or Ebay, I don’t know who actually made it. Whoever made it is just in it for short term sale, not long term brand value.
Jan 30, 2019 at 5:29 pm #3575845Not ultralight and may not be well loved here but I have had good luck with the Etekcity stoves. They throw a decent flame and are better than the BRS-3000 in windy conditions in my experience.
Jan 30, 2019 at 6:21 pm #3575857Gary Dunckel and Ken asked what got me to look at the Pocket Rocket as a possible canister stove of choice. Check out Ryan Jordan’s YouTube video: Ryan’s Recommendation: Lightweight Backpacking Canister Stove Cook Kit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJNpmUHQpf0&index=4&list=PLjdxYRiRt3wED89KpDmJMHbAa2KWDUNZy
Jan 30, 2019 at 7:16 pm #3575864Well that is one opinion
Jan 30, 2019 at 8:43 pm #3575881The Snow Peak upright stoves are very well made. Not the lightest by any means (nor the cheapest), but reliable. For a long time I used the GST-100 as my gold standard for comparisons.
Cheers
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.