Introduction

The Mountainsmith Zerk 40 is a rugged and flexible pack explicitly aimed at thru-hikers and those doing long days or big miles. Designed to be comfortable and stable with easily accessible pockets, the Zerk 40 straddles the line between minimalist, frameless packs and feature-rich packs with more load-bearing capacity. Thick, ergonomic shoulder straps take the brunt of the load while providing accessible external storage options. The upshot is a pack that helps minimize unnecessary stops.
Features and Specifications

Features
- Wide, comfortable shoulder straps
- Dual mesh shoulder pockets with drawstrings
- Outer mesh side pockets
- Inner, diagonally cut side pockets (nest inside outer mesh side pockets)
- Wide roll-top closure with over-the-top webbing
- Large rear stretch pocket
- Elastic gear attachment points located high on shoulder straps
- Integrated shoulder strap safety whistle
- Removable back foam panel (no frame sheet or stays)
- Removable non-load bearing waist belt (webbing strap only, no structure)
- Removable bear-can straps with multiple attachment points
- Removable reflective front bungee
- Hydration system port and internal attachment
Specifications
- Dimensions: 18.5 in x 11.75 in x 5.75 in (47 cm x 30 cm x 14.6 cm)
- Weight (including all straps and waist belt): 28 oz (794 g)
- Weight (straps detached) 25 oz (709 g)
- Recommended load: Up to 30 lbs (13.6 kgs)
- Volume (main compartment, extended): 40 L ( 2441 cubic inches)
- Volume (main compartment, compressed): 32 L (1953 cubic inches)
- Pack Material: 100 denier Nylon HT w/200 denier Spectra double ripstop TPU
- Foam Material: Atilon, EVA, and PE
- Mesh Material: 210 g Stretch Mesh
- Compression Straps: 10mm webbing
- MSRP: $219.95
Review Context

The Mountainsmith Zerk 40 is specifically designed to appeal to thru-hikers and anyone else who wants a small-volume pack with lots of easily accessible external storage. Opening up your pack and digging around takes time, and you only have so much daylight. You can reach eight of the nine external pockets while wearing the Zerk 40 (the ninth is a large stretchy mesh pouch at the rear of the pack).
With ultra-running-inspired shoulder straps, the Zerk 40 is meant to be left on all day – comfy, stable, and breathable.
Finally, the Zerk 40 is supposed to be durable – Mountainsmith hammers this home on the product’s webpage. They say, “Co-designed with The Real Hiking Viking, a professional hike-really-long-distances-really-quickly-er, the ZERK 40 was born out of a need for an ultralight pack that can withstand the thousands of miles per year that The Real Hiking Viking already covers. We wanted to make sure it would allow him to go farther, to hike longer, and to work more efficiently on the trail.”
I kept all of this in mind while testing the Zerk 40 for nearly six months – on desert day trips, in Sierra thru-hikes, and Montana off-trail traverses. I wanted to know if the Zerk 40 was comfortable enough for repeated 30+ mile days. I tried to find out if it was durable enough to handle bushwhacking and talus hopping. I also explored if it was accessible enough to keep the essentials close at hand while remaining voluminous enough to support five to six days of hiking between resupply points.
Description of Field Testing
My first test with the Zerk 40 was a short three-day, two-night late-winter trip in the Sierra Nevadas (described here).

After that, the Zerk 40 was my go-to day hiking pack for the rest of spring and early summer. Next, I brought the Zerk 40 on a thru-hike of the Tahoe Rim Trail, during which I covered 176 miles in six-and-a-half days.

After some more day hikes, I finished my official testing with a six-day, five-night off-trail trek across the valleys and plateaus of Montana’s Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness.

All told, I put nearly 400 miles on the Zerk 40, much of which occurred on high mileage and/or long-duration days.
Performance Assessment

My performance assessment of the Mountainsmith Zerk 40 is based on the following considerations:
- Accessibility and Organization
- Comfort
- Durability
- Stability
- Weight
Member Exclusive
A Premium or Unlimited Membership* is required to view the rest of this article.
* A Basic Membership is required to view Member Q&A events

Discussion
Become a member to post in the forums.
Companion forum thread to: Mountainsmith Zerk 40 Review (Backpack)
This Mountainsmith Zerk 40 review discusses the long term performance of a functional and durable backpack targeted to thru-hikers.
Andrew, have you tried carrying a bear can inside of the pack? Can you share any experiences of how it carried specific bear can models inside rather than on top of the pack?
Hey Matthew! I don’t own a bear canister – my primary hiking areas only require an UrSack or food hanging. I can tell you that the pack seems designed to carry a bear canister on top rather than inside. I think you could probably squeeze a small one in, but I’m fairly confident it wouldn’t be a comfortable experience. I think you’d probably feel it through the foam back panel.
That’s a bummer. Thanks for responding.
Zerk acquired.
I’ve only worn it for ten minutes in the house but I’m quite impressed. The foam back panel is rather stiff, compared to what GG or ULA puts in their packs or improvised Ridgerest/ZLite, CCF, Evazote or relfectix options I’ve tried in the past.
I’m cautiously optimistic that the stiffness of the back in combination with larger shoulder straps might be a solution that works for me when my total pack weight creeps up to around 22 pounds. Normally I’m comfortable to around 18ish pounds in a frameless pack and I’ve been looking for a solution for slightly heavier trips without going to a full framed pack with a big hipbelt. This might be what I’ve been looking for.
Fingers crossed!
Now that you have the pack, how does a bear can fit?
The overall volume seems comparable to a MLD Prophet. I slipped my WI Scout into it and it fits quite easily. I don’t think I’ll have any problem carrying it with a mid, a couple items of extra clothing, quilt, etc for a 3 season trip.
I gave the pack another detailed look last night and saw something that I really don’t like. It’s not a dealbreaker for me if the pack works but I’m guessing this will be a failure point and it’s an area I’ll be careful with and check frequently:
Glad to hear a bear can will fit inside. Strapping it on top looks like it would be unstable.
Any longer term reviews of this?
Very curious about others thoughts on max comfortable load.
I am considering getting a Zerk. Any additional feedback now that some folks have been wearing them for a while now?
Become a member to post in the forums.