SuperUltraLight (SUL) backpacking, by definition, calls for a base pack weight less than 5 pounds (2.27 kg). It's fallen out of favor because of the perceived difficulty of achieving such a low pack weight. Back in 2005, Backpacking Light Editor Carol Crooker published a series of articles on going SUL in different locations and styles to show how it's done. But undeniable drawbacks about SUL then were undesirable compromises and going without. Many of us concluded it is best suited for warm/dry conditions. Fast forward to the present; going SUL is much easier now, with no compromises, and less going without. We now have over 40 small companies designing and selling ultralight backpacking gear, and the big outdoor gear companies are in the game too. Now SUL is easier and better than it's ever been.
But there's one more hurdle to deal with: going SUL in the mountains, where more shelter, insulation, and rain protection are needed. All of us want to backpack in the mountains in the summertime, so SUL needs to evolve beyond secure warm/dry conditions to better meet our needs. It needs to be adapted for mountain conditions - Mountain SuperUltraLight backpacking (M-SUL).
In this series I discuss the concepts, scope, expected conditions, and appropriate ultralight gear and techniques for Mountain SuperUltraLight backpacking in five parts as follows:
Part 1: Concepts and Scope - I present my rationale for M-SUL and define its scope. Part 2A, B, and C: Selecting the Lightest Most Functional Gear. I identify the best gear options by category – those that provide the functionality needed for summertime mountain backpacking, with minimal weight. Part 3: M-SUL Base Weight Gear Lists. I present gear lists that demonstrate how easy it is to “make weight” for M-SUL and at the same time have all the shelter, insulation, and rain protection you need to stay dry, warm, and comfortable in the high country. Part 4a: Reviews of Selected Gear—Backpacks, Shelters, Sleeping Bags and Pads, Cooking Systems, Water Treatment, and Trekking Poles. Reviews of gear tested for this series of articles. Part 4b: Reviews of Selected Gear -- Rainwear, Insulated Clothing, Handwear, Headwear, Footwear, and Gaiters. Reviews of gear tested for this series of articles.ARTICLE OUTLINE
- Overview
- Selecting the Lightest, Most Functional Gear
- Rainwear
- Insulation
- Headwear
- Handwear
- Footwear
- Preview of Part 2C
# WORDS: 5700
# PHOTOS: 9
Member Exclusive
A Premium or Unlimited Membership* is required to view the rest of this article.
* A Basic Membership is required to view Member Q&A events

Discussion
Become a member to post in the forums.
Companion forum thread to:
Mountain SuperUltraLight Backpacking â Going SUL in the Mountains with Adequate Shelter, Insulation, and Rain Protection. Part 2B: Selecting the Lightest, Most Functional Gear – Rainwear, Insulation, Headwear, Handwear, and Footwear
> hell during the other 10%.
Nah, just wrong sort of poncho.
Cheers
…
Down pants are good for hiking – if it's -20 F and 60 MPH winds
Normal hiking you'll get sweaty
Daniel,
In winter I carry Synthetic trousers (Patagonia Micro puffs or Arcteryx Atom Lts) and a Synthetic Hoody (Arcteryx Atom Sv or Kappa) and a down hoody (Stoic Hadron or Gooses Feet Parka) depending on the expected lowest temperatures (last winter camp was -13f)
The system adds a bit of weight over carrying one upper body items but if I end up wearing the synthetic kit while moving it will dry out faster down than and I still have he down piece as a booster.
I am thinking of adding a pair of Gooses Feet down shorts for under the Micro puffs for crazy cold camping.
you can make dany leg pj's out of a powerstretch top by shoving one leg into each arm. the amrs are plenty long enough to cover the feet too. very toasty.
powerstretch was for over a decade my fabric of choice. then they inveted e-vent, and sheep.
with now the no need to not wear a parka when it's wet, and the merino being better (by far) over a much wider range of temps and uses, i am now at a point where the last time i carried a pwrstch top, i could find no combination of weather in which to comfortably wear it.
thusly, i discovered that trick using it for nite nite bottoms.
Great article. I personally think this is a great article for anyone who is interested in ultralight hiking, not just super-ultralight. There are tips here that apply to anyone who is a trying to keep their backpack weight low, regardless of what their base weight it.
There are two surprising pieces of information here for me. The first is the emphasis on down insulation for an insulating jacket. Obviously the gear should vary for the expected conditions. But I find that a synthetic puffy jacket is just right for most of my hiking. It rarely gets below freezing in the day for me (in the summer), whether is it precipitating or not. Once I get moving, then a puffy jacket is just fine. My puffy is a BPL Cocoon Pullover, which is about 8 ounces. It has no baffles, so there is less stitching than a down jacket. It won't last as long, but so far has held up just fine. The nice thing is that will be just as warm at the beginning of a trip as will on the last day, even if I have been walking uphill through fog the entire time.
I think a warmer jacket would be overkill, and drive me to use something in between (like a windshirt) which would add a couple ounces to my system. The advantage, of course, is that I could get by with less insulation in my sleeping bag, but I think that is probably a wash (if my jacket is a bit warmer but my sleeping bag has less insulation than I'm not sure I would come out ahead).
The most interesting part of this article, though are the ideas about rain gear. I use my raingear as bug protection, so breathability is very important to me. Conventional wisdom was that Propose (O2, etc.) was very breathable, very waterproof, very light but extremely fragile. Event was more breathable, but a lot heavier. Some laminate jackets (including some failed products) were lighter than Propore, a lot more durable (which really isn't saying much) but really poor when it came to breathability. Then there are windshirts, which breath well, are reasonably durable, very lightweight, but not very waterproof (to the point where using them as your only rain gear might be dangerous).
Some of these jackets sound really promising (and might replace my Propore) but I would love to see the numbers on them. Are they better than Propore when it comes to breathability or being waterproof? If they are even close than it might be worth it just to save a little weight and get the added durability.
…
Become a member to post in the forums.