So I have these two shelters…and I know it’s apples to oranges. Two totally different shelters. Both of them are nice tents. My intended use is mainly section type hikes. My trips are anywhere from about 4 days to 7 days. I have no intentions of through hiking anything anytime soon. I mainly hike here in Utah during the summers. So high altitudes and three season temps. I’m not an insane “ultra light” guy, but more of a “pretty light” one. I’ve used one man tents in the past, but no more. Too cramped. So I decided to upgrade this winter!
I bought these two tents in the past few months. I’ve set up both of them in my backyard a couple of times. I bought each one very deliberately after doing as much research as I could on each shelter prior to purchasing. So…I have them both, but only need one. My plan is to set each one up a time or two and see which one I like more. That’s where I am in the process at the moment…trying to decide which one I like more. And price is a wash. Each shelter cost me exactly $280.
First the X-Mid. There’s a lot to like: The X-Mid is MASSIVE on the inside. It’s got tons of space! I also dig that it’s about 10 oz lighter than the Copper Spur. And no tent poles to carry with the X-Mid as well. All good things. But…the X-Mid is definitely harder to pitch than the Copper Spur. I can see where I’ll probably get better at the X-Mid, but the Copper Spur is automatic right out of the box – super simple to pitch with zero guess work. I’ve pitched the X-Mid 3 or 4 times and the last time was the first time I think I got it pretty near square. Even though the exterior was pitched tight this last time the interior tent seemed kind of a bit sloppy and slack. One “end” of the interior was nearly touching the external wall and the other was a good 3 or 4 inches off the external wall. (I must say it was a bit windy though so that might have had something to do with that.) Regardless, the interior has seemed kind of frumpy each time I’ve pitched it. Maybe I just need to practice more…? Maybe I need to experiment with different guy lines and tie offs to get the tent tight and square…? Maybe both.
The Copper Spur: Like I said, it’s insanely easy to set up. My son set it up today while I was setting up the X-Mid. I think I turned around once and he had it set up! Wow. I also really liked that it was nice and tight. I mean everything was tight. Every single time I set it up it’s tight. I also think the no fly option may come into play on the Copper Spur on some crystal clear high Utah night. Now, the Copper Spur is definitely smaller than the X-Mid. I measured them both and the X-Mid is a couple of three inches wider and about 10 inches longer at least. But it’s still not as small as a one person tent so it seems big enough to me.
I really want to like the X-Mid more than the Copper Spur! I think the design is super cool, it’s lighter, bigger, and it looks awesome. But I’m just thinking about the set up of the Copper Spur. It’s just so easy to set up and it’s tight. I hate having to carry specific poles for it, but it’s not really that big of a load. At the moment I’m leaning toward the heavier, smaller, truly free-standing Copper Spur.
Could someone talk some sense into me, please?





would be breaking camp in the rain. Piece of cake! It also goes in the stuff sack easier that way. I’ll keep working with it.

