Topic
wind shirt epic fabric approx. 35cfm with permament >300mm hydrastatic head
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › wind shirt epic fabric approx. 35cfm with permament >300mm hydrastatic head
- This topic has 15 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 2 months ago by JCH.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jan 31, 2020 at 12:20 pm #3629403
Hi there,
there is plenty of talk about the sweet spot for an alternative approach to rain wear using a wind shirt made of epic fabric with approx. 35cfm & a permament >300mm hydrastatic head.
But who currently makes them and where can such a shirt be found?
Also, who makes this in a civil colour not using any multicam colours?I remember that the current wild things shirt not using a multicam colour only have a 5cfm rating
Jan 31, 2020 at 12:48 pm #3629408As far as I can tell there aren’t any current options. I think the pre 2012 Houdini was 35cfm but I’m not sure it reached 300mm HH – I know mine doesn’t hold off rain long, but of course it’s not permanent DWR like EPIC.
Jan 31, 2020 at 4:20 pm #3629419Of the wind shirts I have currently tested and are currently available, 4 have HH >300. However, the air permeability for these ranges from .6 to 3.3. The closest I am aware of to what you are looking for is the Mountain Hardware Kor Preshell at 23 and 231. Nextec Epic is long gone. I have looked at 4 of them including a Greg Norman. Highest air perm is 1.2. Praetoria had HH of 1083 but is virtually wind proof and it has the worst MVTR of the 4.
Probably more important than the 35/300 is what kind of weather conditions you will be exposed to and the level of exertion you expect to achieve on your activities. Today, I was hiking in >20 mph winds and 18 F temps.   A 35 CFM/Ft2 jacket is of no use in those sort of conditions.
Jan 31, 2020 at 8:01 pm #3629436In those conditions, a rain shell would probably even be OK.
Jan 31, 2020 at 9:52 pm #3629443I have plenty of UL EPIC fabric left in my stash but I have absolutely no idea of its properties, I also have some Praetorian here but that is far from lightweight.
I guess it is surplus to requirements now my Northern Boreal trip is cancelled
Jan 31, 2020 at 11:24 pm #3629450The original UL Epic pullovers made by Wild Things had poor breathability and left me soaked in rain/sleet storms, either from my own sweat, or from leakage, or a little of both. Later, however, Feathered Friends and some others offered sleeping bags with Epic outers, and don’t see how they could do that if the breathability had not been improved; but can’t vouch that it was, as I wold never buy Epic anything after my experience with it..
Wild Things only makes one shell now with the Epic treatment, a High Loft cold weather Jacket made for the Marine Corps, but sold on its website. Can’t vouch for that either.
I think much more breathable tops are out there. It has been posted on BPL that eVent sold its process to some garment manufacturers, but GTX seems to predominate now. I never tried the eVent, but their were many fans on BPL. If you want data, there is the article on BPL by Alan Dickson, but it is a bit old by now.
Would offer you my two Wild Things pullovers, but know that you would be disappointed, so won’t.
Feb 2, 2020 at 7:50 pm #3629638Hi Stephen S, what do you mean by “Nextec Epic is long gone”? Are you saying it is no longer available, I assume you mean in the civilian arena?
Thanks in advance, Scott in NZ
Feb 2, 2020 at 9:28 pm #3629654Scott:Â That is my understanding.
Feb 3, 2020 at 3:46 pm #3629744I have 178 yds orange Epic sitting under the work bench. Willing to sell yardage to any MYOG’er still believing in this fabric.
Feb 3, 2020 at 4:02 pm #3629745A tad heavy at 4.5 oz, but feature rich with pockets and pit zips, the Argon 90 wind jacket at dutchweargear claims 40 CFM. No HH quoted.
Feb 3, 2020 at 8:44 pm #3629761I purchased some Argon 90 from Dutchweargear in 2019. I measured the permeability at 9.4 CFM/Ft2. I also had it tested by Touchstone Labs. They got 8.6. You can send Dutch an email and ask where he got the 40. I measured the HH at 353mm/wc. Breathability is better than average at 2820 g/m2/24hr. If anyone has a wind shirt that they believe meets the OP’s desired performance and wants to part with it for a few days, PM me and I will test it and post the results.
Feb 4, 2020 at 6:15 am #3629782“I purchased some Argon 90 from Dutchweargear in 2019. I measured the permeability at 9.4 CFM/Ft2. I also had it tested by Touchstone Labs. They got 8.6.”
Very interesting…I would also like to know how/where Dutch got that 40 CFM figure his is quoting.
Feb 4, 2020 at 9:01 am #3629795I followed the link you provided. The reference is from a response to a question that is answered under the discussion section, by Alex Thomas, who I guess is an employee. I presume that is what you have already seen. So, I guess you could ask him.
Feb 4, 2020 at 11:25 am #3629817Stephen – You are absolutely correct, I should have paid closer attention…I assumed the response was from Dutch. Also could have sworn he mentioned this figure in his video but a second viewing showed that he did not.
I have sent an inquiry to DutchWareGear as to the source and accuracy of the 40 CFM figure and will report back if/when I receive a reply. My guess is that your tested figures are still correct, i.e. there has been no magical re-invention of the fabric.
Feb 4, 2020 at 2:17 pm #3629869I have 178 yds orange Epic sitting under the work bench. Willing to sell yardage to any MYOG’er still believing in this fabric.
Well that would depend on the cost and its properties but it is probably still a good fabric for a the shell layer in clothing
Feb 4, 2020 at 2:34 pm #3629873Got the following reply from DutchWareGear. Seems as though they are quoting our very own Richard Nisley, albeit Argon 90 from another cottage constructor. Full reply:
Hi,
We don’t have an official test for this but will likely have it done from IDFL. However, if you check out the link below, ARGON 90 was tested by others and came out to be around 40 CFM.
https://backpackinglight.com/forums/topic/100458/Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Alex -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.