So I’m gonna throw this out there and see what ya’ll think. It seems like the MLD Cricket has got to be one of the most underappreciated tarps out there, esp when compared to all the excitement and love for the Hexamid solo (RIP).
I haven’t been around UL forever so maybe there’s some weird backstory to why the Hexamid is extremely popular and no one seems to talk about the Cricket, but what’s the deal? There are only 2 decent reviews of the Cricket, while the Hexamid has plenty. In my couple years exploring UL backpacking, I’d hardly ever heard of the Cricket, while the Hexamid seems to be in your face constantly thru GearSwap, Gear Lists, reviews, etc.
Basically asking because I just picked up a .74oz DCF Cricket, somewhat on a whim since I was so unfamiliar w/ it, and it seems amazing! Looking at the specs, the .5oz Cricket is 6.5 oz (w/o guylines), and the .74oz is only 7.5 oz, both of which are quite a bit lighter than the Hexamid at 11oz. Granted, the Hexamid has the full net under it, but the numbers I’m seeing put the net at ~5oz worth, so that makes them almost identical in weight. The MLD is cheaper as well. The big thing I don’t get is that the Cricket seems like it is much more storm worthy than the Hexamid, since the beak gives a lot of coverage. So why is does there appear to be so little love for the Cricket? Do people hate the two pole setup? The lack of doors (even though the beak is substantial)? Does the name not inspire confidence? Maybe the picture of a tattooed man in the buff at the top of the tarp page of MLDs website is too off-putting?
Just curious. thanks!

