Topic

Whole pack wear n’tear w/DCF 50 fabric (hybrid)

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
HkNewman BPL Member
PostedAug 23, 2019 at 3:02 pm

Is there any long term wearing down or DCF 50 (hybrid) fabric on well used packs?

A thru hiker remarked to me …

… his roll top was getting worn where it wrinkled getting in/out everyday for months. Should have asked him about the rest of the pack, now that I think of it.

What’s everyone else’s experience?

HkNewman BPL Member
PostedAug 23, 2019 at 3:04 pm

Can’t fix the first post format (wth?) but question still stands.

Brad Rogers BPL Member
PostedAug 23, 2019 at 3:29 pm

I’ve found Hybrid DCF to not be very abraision resistant (the 150D or the 50D) so it isn’t great for off trail use.  For on trail, though it should be OK.  I hike with a guy that used the same HMG pack on 2/3 of the triple crown.  It does become less waterproof after a while as the mylar breaks down (after repeated rolling/stuffing, etc) but that is to be expected.

Personally, I think Hybrid DCF is way overpriced and not the best pack fabric, but everyone seems to think it’s cool so it sells.   I much prefer 210d X-Pack or Dyneema Grid.

Alex Wallace BPL Member
PostedAug 23, 2019 at 5:50 pm

The roll top of my HMG 3400 Porter was pretty “fuzzy” after 2 years of casual weekend warrior use. The rest of the pack was fine.

PostedAug 23, 2019 at 7:04 pm

I’ve carried a DCH / 50D pack for 2000 miles.  And no, I have never suffered any breakdown in waterproofness.  I think it is the best fabric when treated with just a little bit of respect and care.  If you do wear a thin spot somehow, Dyneema tape would provide an immediate and foolproof solution.

SIMULACRA BPL Member
PostedAug 25, 2019 at 4:30 am

HMG Southwest 3400 white has proven very well for the two seasons I’ve put it through so far. Roll top shows very wrinkled wear but no feathering. The bottom has of course browned up, but far less than I expected and has only light feathering on the pointy corners. Never have used a pack cover on it and is as waterproof as the day I got it still

James Marco BPL Member
PostedAug 25, 2019 at 1:22 pm

After two years using my HMG Southwest 2400 pack (black version) it is among the most durable packs I have used. That said the weight is ridiculously high. At 2pounds, that is a LOT of weight. In ten or 15 years, I expect it to be in good shape. But, that durability is associated with it’s weight. A 15oz GG Miniposa has over ten years on it, but has required minor repairs after every trip. The Murmur (2012 model, 13oz) works well in summer months for what I need. Where do you draw the line between a highly durable pack and one that is durable enough? This is like building a house and using one step up in lumber. It really makes no difference for the first 50 years. By then, I’ll be dead…soo, who cares?

Dyneema hybrids are good rugged materials. If I was only 30 years old I could expect the pack to last till I was 80. But, carrying the extra pound or more in weight every second of every day while hiking for 50 years is…well, poor judgement. The heavy duty material clearly weighs more. It clearly is more durable. Is it worth the weight? This is something every individual hiker needs to answer for him/her self.

The jury is still out on the Dyneema Hybrids. A few frayed areas in the packs, means little and a layer of duct tape does well. A good pack is one that will last about 10 years with only minor repairs. Some issues are caused by the hiker: dragging over rocks on an ascent/descent, snagging on a branch and simply pulling it till it frees, offtrail hiking, tossing a pack down 30 feet rather than attaching a rope to lower it, dropping the pack on the ground repeatedly, etc. I ignore those issues because, they COULD be avoided and many packs (even highly touted ones) will sometimes fail. Packs have a purpose. If you go beyond that there might be problems. Hybrids are no different in that regard. But, it really hasn’t been around long enough to state categorically “It is the best fabric for packs.” Indeed, on an SUL trip carrying 10 pounds for three nights, it is likely NOT the best choice.

On my trips with Lean2Rescue, where carrying 20 to 25 pounds of tool weight, my HMG works well. It handles the odd shapes, pointy items (nails) and dense weights (hammer, tape, chalk line, square, saw, etc) fairly well. Would I use the same pack on my UL trips? No. I have no practical use for that kind of durability only carrying 20 to 25 pounds of weight over a well marked and clear trail. I have around 15 other packs to choose from. Mostly, it depends on the type of trip, the overall pack weight, and the treatment it will receive during the trip…no one wants a blown out shoulder strap in the middle of a trip, especially a bushwhack.

Generally, a 5oz/yd fabric is a BIG overkill for most backpackers. For ultralight packers, even 1oz/yd Robic is a bit much. You can get packs ranging from 2.5oz to over 7 pounds to do the same job. But, then again, durability becomes an issue.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
Loading...