Don’t mean to drip off topic. A question about HMG fit. It looks like they use twin stays. I assume from the shoulder strap attachment point down to the hip belt area. They do not use load lifters. So. Should one think about ordering a longer torso so that the shoulder strap rolls of the top of the shoulder a bit more horizontal vs rolling over the shoulder even though there is a frame of sorts? Thanks. ~RL
I picked up my Windrider 2400 around when they were released. I opted to go with my standard torso size and the shoulder straps curve slightly upward over my shoulder. I never have my pack loaded over my shoulder straps, or where the twin stays end, so I wouldn’t benefit from load lifters. I know someone figured out how to rig load lifters to their pack, but you have to go with a shorter torso size/straps rolling over the shoulder. I probably would’ve gone this route if I knew beforehand:Â https://benkilbourne.com/blog/2019/6/23/adding-loadlifters-to-hmg-packs
1) The main compartment closures are a bit ridiculous. They have the Drybag type closure, They have a pull down to the sides type closure. And they have a strap/loop that goes over the top. Why three? I removed the pull down side closure straps.
I did the same, along with removing the side compression straps and the four attachments on the front pocket. I just found they got more in the way or were never used.
3) Unless you have a full pack at all times (likely impossible with a 3400,) the upper loop will NOT hold a bear ball (bear canister) well. It likes to slip out one way or the other. I never did change this, but a simple strap would work better and save a bit of weight. I usually drop the bear ball in the bottom of my pack, anyway, just as if I was carrying my bear bag, when needed.
I have had it several years now. Some of the fabric is a bit discolored, but it is all in good shape. So, durability is VERY HIGH. Well worth the dollars, and, the extra pound of weight.
My pack is compressed enough where I carry a Bearikade Blazer so it partially sits against the stays and is cradled on top with a sit pad between, and I found it pretty solid. I do keep my food in my pack and not in the bear can when hiking though. I agree with the durability. My pack is going on 10 years, and I’ve only had one small 1/2″Â tear on the nylon face and patched it with Dyneema tape and some minor stretched stitch holes on the front pocket, probably because I loaded it more than I should.
Like Johan mentioned, the pack was sub-optimal for me and I just lived with it. The minimally padded hip belt would bruise my hipbones if I carried more than 20 pounds and the original packs came with the top shoulder straps sewn too close together, so they put more weight on your trapezius, and their hip belt pockets were pitifully small, which was updated in the past year or so IIRC. I finally got tired of my pack this year and ended up ordering an Atom Packs Mo 40L.
I generally see backpackers with the Windrider/Southwest/etc. and pack rafters/winter hikers with the Porter. Not sure if that correlates to anything.