Topic
Upright Canister Stoves – A Survey of the State of the Art
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Upright Canister Stoves – A Survey of the State of the Art
- This topic has 8 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 6 months ago by David Thomas.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Mar 27, 2017 at 11:26 am #3459787
I’ve compiled something of a survey of the current “state of the art” of upright canister stoves and put it into tabular form (see below). No, the table is not exhaustive, but the major brands are all represented, and I think it’s fairly thorough. Note that I only covered upright canister stoves. Integrated canister stoves (e.g. a Jetboil Flash) and remote canister stoves (e.g. a Kovea Spider) were not included in order to keep the length manageable.
I’ve written <u>an article to accompany the chart</u> which is posted on Massdrop. The article has a special section that discusses the four ultralight upright canister stoves that are widely available (ultralight here meaning sub 2 ounce):
- The BRS-3000T
- The FMS-300T
- The FMS-116T
- The Snow Peak Lite Max (also mentioned is the Kovea Supalite, the Lite Max’s slightly heavier fraternal twin)
There is also <u>an html version of the table</u> on my blog if that’s easier to read.
I hope it is of interest,
HJ
x
Mar 27, 2017 at 1:06 pm #3459799nice report, very complete, thanks
Mar 27, 2017 at 2:41 pm #3459819Thanks, Jim!
Mar 28, 2017 at 12:58 am #3459940Thanks, guys. I hope it’s useful. :) I myself like being able to scan down something in tabular form.
HJ
Sep 29, 2017 at 10:49 am #3493879Thanks for all the comparisons in the table, Jim. I hiked the Colorado Trail this July/August, and was all set to take my 650 ml Sidewinder and alcohol stove. Just before starting a fire ban was issued for the first 105 mls (there was an actual fire between Breck and Copper Mtn). This ban included al stoves, so I packed my Jetboil Sol Ti instead.
However, while on the trail I got to think why not take a tiny canister stove as well as the al just for the ban sections. The 0.9 oz weight of the 3000T would be perfect here: use al where allowed and carry the 0.9 oz stove, without canister, for a minimal weight penalty. When necessary you can buy a canister too.
This would be the most efficient way, as my resupplies varied from 7 days to 3 days, where al wins out.Sep 29, 2017 at 12:53 pm #3493891Personally, I’d pick one or the other, with the canister being the obvious choice where fire bans are going to be encountered.
Even if you start out using the alcohol setup and acquire a canister later, you’ll still have to carry the partial canister anyway or find some way to dispose of it. I suppose you could give it to someone who is also using a canister system, but some people might be leery of heading out on the trail with a canister with an unknown amount of fuel in it.
Sep 29, 2017 at 1:13 pm #3493897I would safely dispose of the part used canister at the next resupply point, or leave it in a hiker box, and buy alcohol there instead. In the CT example above I would have been able to use alcohol for 380 miles, with just a 0.9 oz penalty, or even bin the 3000T since it is so cheap.
Sep 29, 2017 at 8:37 pm #3493981Most of my hikes are in more obscure places without hiker boxes, but I’ve pondered if, say, a AT thru-hiker would benefit from carrying a transfer valve.
Then you could top off or combine canister contents from partially-used ones. There are lots of caveats and practice needed to do that safely (a whole thread or article’s worth), but it would be one way to save weight, create custom fills, and split the far cheaper fuel in a 450-gram canister among multiple 220- and 110-gram canisters if you were in a group or bumped into other hikers before hitting the trail again.Sep 29, 2017 at 8:42 pm #3493982And, like BobM, I’d pick one or the other. And it would the canister stove if it’s required anywhere along the route. “Beware the man with one gun” (because he shoots that one really well).
OTEPOH: if most of the route allows for the alcohol stove, you could plan a few days of no-cook menus to get through the no-fire zones.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.