Topic

UL Drybag

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
PostedJul 7, 2022 at 5:20 am

I have been using Exped 70D dry bags for a while now to organize and keep my stuff dry. They work fine but I want something lighter. So I ordered the UL version which uses a 10D fabric similar to the sea to summit ultra sil dry bags. However the fabric seems very thin. I wonder if they will perform well out on trail. I also use a 20liter as a food bag, which I usually hang in a tree at night when I go to sleep. Another option could be 15D Osprey dry bags. Can someone advice?

Dan BPL Member
PostedJul 7, 2022 at 8:20 am

Not sure if this is your question, but I have used the S2S Ultra-sil bags for several years now with pretty good results. No punctures, actually. I did have one failure where I ripped the top off as I was stuffing my quilt inside. Now I’m careful to be more gentle.

PostedJul 7, 2022 at 7:04 pm

The 1.0 DCF is durable and long lasting for dry bags, but I don’t like .51 DCF for stuff sacks. I mostly use 7D silnylon DIY for that. 0.8 DCF works for stuff sacks, however the extra expense isn’t worth it IMO. Dry bags are a different story though. Waterproofness is paramount and of course low weight is too. That’s where I think 1.0 DCF is best. Very strong.

The S2S ultra-sil Dan refers to is 30D Cordura. Very high quality material and weighs about 1.35 oz per sq yd. Still won’t match the waterproofness of DCF though, yet for most applications it would probably be just fine.

DWR D BPL Member
PostedJul 8, 2022 at 8:19 am

1) “waterproof” bags that have a Velcro closure (like zPacks) are NOT water proof. Velcro leaks; the closure needs to be something that can seal against itself, like rubber.

2) DCF is vulnerable to puncture and can develop leaks pretty easily if you don’t handle it right. For instance, pushing sleeping bag with force into the DCF bag when the DCF bag is on granite or other materials with sharp crystals… or even decomposed granite… can make mink/micro punctures. After using in that way try filling your DCF bag with water and observe the small spray of water exiting the bag. This can happen with sil-nylon also, but just a big harder since it does not puncture as easily.

PostedJul 8, 2022 at 8:38 am

Yea but if the DCF “dry” bag is folded over a few times and the buckles are snapped together the bag is going to have to be fully submerged for quite awhile for any water to get in.  A highly unlikely scenario. It’s the DCF material I’m referring to as “waterproof”. I’m looking more at water getting into the bottom of my pack in a deluge rainfall event (with the dry bag sitting upright in pack).  ZPacks and other manufacturers use 1.0 DCF for their tent floors and I’m sure they can get punctures with all the weight of a human or two on them, but for stuffing a sleeping bag into a dry bag? I suppose it’s conceivable if you’re doing it for years over abrasive surfaces.

DWR D BPL Member
PostedJul 8, 2022 at 12:00 pm

“ZPacks and other manufacturers use 1.0 DCF for their tent floors and I’m sure they can get punctures with all the weight of a human or two on them, but for stuffing a sleeping bag into a dry bag? I suppose it’s conceivable if you’re doing it for years over abrasive surfaces.’

I got a puncture first time out… those crystals embedded in granite are sharp.

“ea but if the DCF “dry” bag is folded over a few times and the buckles are snapped together the bag is going to have to be fully submerged for quite awhile for any water to get in. A highly unlikely scenario.”

Not so unlikely… all it takes is one slip in a river crossing…

Have you ever slept in a sopping wet sleeping bag on night below freezing???

I have, and it’s no fun. I double bag my sleeping bag with real dry-bags (not Velcro closures) which are waterproof… it’s an easy enough thing to do as habit.

… just sayin’

JCH BPL Member
PostedJul 9, 2022 at 7:10 am

Agree with @bradmacmt.  In my experience, the STS Ultra-Sil Nano bags I have are highly water resistant at best.  I have experienced water ingress with a Nano that was itself in a sil daypack.

If you want waterPROOF you have to go with something like the STS Ultra-Sil bags (30D) and accept the 0.3 oz penalty (8L).  I only trust the 15D Nano with things that will be buried in, and further protected by, a very highly water resistant backpack.

Dan BPL Member
PostedJul 9, 2022 at 8:58 am

I just double-checked, and the S2S bags I’ve been using are 15D. They are called “Nano Dry-Sacks”. They are the dry-bag style where you roll the top down a few turns and snap the buckle. I agree that it would be risky to use these to hang food, it wouldn’t take much to puncture them. I use them as a stuff sack for down items inside my pack, and as I mentioned above, I try to be gentle with them.

I have often used the S2S 30D cordura stuff sacks to hang food, and I find them to be high quality and sturdy. Since I pack my food and trash in zip-locks, I just use a regular stuff sack to contain them. I find it to be more convenient, and no problems so far.

JCH BPL Member
PostedJul 9, 2022 at 10:00 am

Ok, so nobody would recommend using 10D dry bags

Not as a food bag to be hung in a tree, no.  I might trust them as a dry bag buried in your pack.

PostedJul 10, 2022 at 2:02 am

If you talk to a manufacturer of real submersible bags (so rated submersible) they will tell you that NO top bag will meet the requirements. A good rolltop can be very good and good enough for temporary submersion but it really depends what you need it to actually survive. I ended up buying a small submersible dry bag for my pricey camera that was reasonably light (it uses a real waterproof zipper – not the kind you see on a rain jacket).

 

Funnily enough the manufacturer recommended that unless I was going with a rated submersible bag with a waterproof zipper that the next best thing was just a plastic bag tied tightly at the top. The trashbag method really is quite good.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
Loading...