Hi all,
Long time lurker, first time poster! Please go easy on me :’) Even though this is Backpacking LIGHT I’m hoping to start a discussion on trail nutrition for those of us who really can’t afford to lose weight on trail – that means no calorie deficits or skimping on food.
I’m beginning to plan for a NOBO AZT Thru and a NOBO Vermont LT Thru. I have an incredibly high base metabolism and have always struggled to maintain my weight; I also have a very low body fat % and can’t afford to lose, well, any on a thru hike. I came across this excellent BPL article (https://backpackinglight.com/how-much-food-should-i-pack-how-to-save-weight-on-backpacking-food-based-on-the-energy-mile-theory/) and I started to do some further research, and a little bit of number crunching – here is a link to my sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JbrvjOEUgnLMtatv3bSmGrRVp8iK3lAnVDyK2TQ7l1c/edit?usp=sharing
I tried to take into account Petzoldt’s Energy Mile Theory, increased basal metabolic rate based on a high intensity lifestyle (backpacking, rowing, etc.), and attempted to calculate the elasticity of Calories/Energy Mile based on a trail’s average % grade. Obviously, this model is based on many assumptions and if I had statistical ability I would try to calculate an error term, tease out endogenous variables like pack weight, all that. But as it stands I’m quite happy with this model.
However, I have a hard time accepting the results. To me, the math makes sense but practically speaking, come on? On the other hand, I do view backpacking as a proper sport and so I do take on-trail nutrition quite seriously. This has raised quite a few questions for me…
In case you don’t feel like poring over my sheet, the general results I’m getting are ~10,000C/day and, assuming 120C/oz avg, ~6lbs of food/day.
Looking forward to good discussion,
Thanks.

