- Jan 21, 2019 at 8:00 pm #3574276
Andrew MarshallBPL Member
@andrewsmarshallLocale: Eastern Sierras by way of the Southern Appalachians
Companion forum thread to: Therm-a-Rest NeoAir UberLite Sleeping Pad Review
This Therm-a-Rest NeoAir UberLite review presents our performance assessment of the lightest full-sized air-filled sleeping pad on the market.Jan 22, 2019 at 6:07 am #3574388
John HBPL Member
Great review thanks. I finally paid to subscribe based on how good and thorough you were. I simply can’t get past the price though… and knowing that, like an Apple phone or Porsche car, a large proportion is simply profit. Apple and Porsche still set the standard IMO, but I ain’t paying 1/3 or more pure profit.
I coughed up for an StS Comfort Plus about 3 years ago as the heavy duty hiking mattress to get into hiking despite being very concerned about getting a good sleep – it worked! It was a big outlay for a non-hiker but I understood the potential value was there. Compared to the main Thermorest options, it is over twice the weight but less than half the cost. And two full air chambers.
Now I’m looking to assemble a UL kit and the Thermorests would be at the top of the list but for their lack of a regular and wide option … and those prices. Instead, I am going for a cheap foil-on-one side foam thing plus a $35 StS rip off from China. $50 total cost, some redundancy and perhaps 650g total. The only other starter is the Rei tapered, insulated option.
I get how the price can be seen as cheap when averaged over 100 or more nights of good sleep over years. And they basically invented a lot of this stuff. That is worth something. But the cost of entry is over $350 AUD and you either get something overly long or a good length but not wide enough. So no.
Thanks again for this review though! Cheers JohnJan 22, 2019 at 6:18 am #3574389
Nice review, though lacking in info on long term durability other than theory, which is what most of us care about. But not surprising given how new the product is.
Only statements that I took issue with wasn’t the UberLite part and perhaps it should be noted in a separate thread. it was the comment on how sleep can degrade on a foam pad and that your sleep will degrade the longer you are out. That has not been my experience at all. In fact it is the opposite as my sleep improves the longer out I am, not degrading, where I eventually sleep more soundly than at home (note that I’m a light sleeper at home who tosses a lot and all the staring at at computer screens before bed probably doesn’t help). Hiking for 12-13+ hours a day tends to help with sleep quality for me as does getting into the natural circadian rhythm with the sun/night cycle. I hiked the PCT with a GG Torso Pad+SitPad on a 1/8″ thinpad and I think I slept pretty well after a few weeks on the trail without any soreness or numbness which I’ve only experienced when I allowed myself to get overweight by a good margin or tried sleeping on an AT shelter floor made out of logs not boards. Though I do admit to being very selective in my normal cowboy camp/tarp campsites with an eye for comfort as much as drainage. Note, I’m not talking about using those thin Zrest/Ridgerest pads, but Gossamer Gears effectively thicker pads where the bumps aren’t hollow on the other side and thus can’t collapse as much. With the Zrest, I can more see your point, but I haven’t used them in 12+ years so don’t remember them well.
I also own a short NeoAir, but I still go the foam pad route 2 out 3 trips even now for a small weight savings as I still bring the thinpad with the neoair for puncture protection. I tend to only bring the NeoAir with my smaller MLD Burn where the GG pads fill up too much of the volume and I really have to compress my sleeping quilt to fit which I don’t like. The NeoAir in comparison takes up much less space which is it’s biggest advantage to me. That said, this Uber Lite intrigues me as the short version is as light or may be a bit lighter than my TorsoPad/SitPad setup which does have my attention and strong interest as except for possible durability (which is still a big deal in pointy environments), it beats out my foam pad in every other category. Given the 2 REI giftcards I got for Christmas, when does REI have their next 20% off one item sale as I’m almost sold?
Jan 22, 2019 at 11:32 am #3574398
- This reply was modified 1 month ago by Miner.
James MarcoBPL Member
@jamesdmarcoLocale: Finger Lakes
Durability, well this is my primary concern. I think that dropping the top side to 15D and leaving the bottom at 30D would have been a more durable, but less weight saving, choice. Forest duff, pine needles, twigs, sharp rocks are of some concern (pokes,) but these are easily repaired. Mostly, I think sand will do the primary damage. Even small amounts will abrade, doing severe un-repairable damage to the bottom in the form of multiple fine leaks and weakened fabric. I will wait for a couple years to see some longer duration reports, I think, before committing ~$180 to a pad that may not hold up. Though it might be worth it for the 3.2oz weight savings.
Thanks for the report!Jan 22, 2019 at 3:29 pm #3574414
karl hafnerBPL Member
@khafnerLocale: upstate NY
How times have changed. May I say improved. Back in the 60’s and 70’s I routinely went out in winter and used a 1/2 inch ensolite pad in the Sierras all winter. I doubt it had an R value of 2. I do now prefer my Exped down mat. The new light wt pad should have excellent utility in 3 seasons. Having punctured several pads I do have concerns re: durability.Jan 28, 2019 at 4:32 am #3575462
@sfoldmanclanLocale: Washington DC
Why didn’t they use Dyneema? Its lighter, stronger, etc…Jan 28, 2019 at 11:29 am #3575478
James MarcoBPL Member
@jamesdmarcoLocale: Finger Lakes
“Why didn’t they use Dyneema? Its lighter, stronger, etc…”
Because it is less abrasion resistant than nylon. Laminating an abrasion resistant fabric makes it far heavier in total weight than nylon. There are other reasons, creasing and bending for example. The technology doesn’t exist to make a reliable/durable dyneema air pad, yet. And of course, $$$.Jan 28, 2019 at 11:16 pm #3575564
John GiesemannBPL Member
I have to agree with the first reviewer regarding price. It is hard to understand why a pad that is technologically simpler than the XLite costs more. Is the material really that much more expensive? Or is the extra price simply because it is lighter. Also, is nyon material really that expensive? The Sea to Summit Ultralight pad is similar to this pad and only costs $99.95, $79 dollars less. Yes, the R-Value is only rated at 0.7 but I have slept on this pad down to freezing and had no problems. (Yes, I sleep very warm but I don’t think the Uberlite is goiing to sleep much warmer.) And, yes, the S2S pad weighs a good deal more, about 5 ounces more, but, It is still signiicantly lighter than the previous pad I was using and very similar in size to the Uberlite and Xlite pads. And $29.95 cheaper than the XLite pad.
Does this make a difference? I think it does. When we will pay almost any amount just to save 3 to 4 ounces, we send a strong message to the manufacturers. Where will the price increases end? They won’t if we continue to buy at inflated prices. When I see tents costing from $500 to $1,000 simlply because they are lightweight, it is very difficult to see the justification. It is getting difficult for the average user to have a lightweight system for a reasonable dollar amount.
I just hope the manufacturers can begin to make lightweight, preferably ultralight, products for a reasonable price again.Jan 29, 2019 at 2:30 am #3575595
jeffrey armbrusterBPL Member
@bookLocale: Northern California
I use a polycryo ground cloth. This helps keep the floor of my tent clean and helps with abrasion on the floor at a very minimal weight cost. It also helps with punctures. I also use a very thin and light foam mattress from Gossamer Gear inside my tent and under my mattress primarily for puncture protection, but also for a bit of added warmth. This combination makes me more confident in using an Exped air mattress and has kept me from having any leaks. And since I’d use this combination in any case with any mattress, it would add a lot of confidence in using the Uberlight.
Of course, there could be issues with this mattress over time for other reasons.
I’m not shelling out $180.00 clams for this at this moment in my life. BUT, if you pro rate the thing over 70 or 80 nights or more….it costs much, much less than a room for two nights in a Motel Six. Thinking like that, it’s probably worth the money.Jan 29, 2019 at 12:33 pm #3575643
Brad PBPL Member
When you build a quilt on the EE web site, choosing the 7d material instead of 10d increases the cost. I can only assume the lighter materials are more expensive.Feb 3, 2019 at 4:04 pm #3576563
Ross BleakneyBPL Member
It is hard to understand why a pad that is technologically simpler than the XLite costs more.
It is the same reason that new phones cost more. It isn’t the cost of manufacturing or materials, it is because the people who make the new product thinks they are worth more. They don’t believe that this will replace previous pads, or be the standard for pads. It is merely an option for those that are willing to baby their gear, and are willing to put up with a colder pad. That means that they don’t expect to sell huge numbers, regardless of price. It would be silly, therefore, to sell this for under the cost of the XLite. If they did, they would have trouble recouping the cost of development.
As for why all the XLite products are relatively expensive, I’m guessing there are a couple big factors. One is the cost of development, which I would imagine is pretty high for this company. They are one of the more innovative companies out there (especially the Thermarest division). Second, the products are made in the U. S., and I believe they are made in Seattle. That means labor costs are more than the U. S. average (Seattle has a high minimum wage) and much higher than the developing world. My guess is they hire (and keep) skilled manufacturers by paying them well.
When we will pay almost any amount just to save 3 to 4 ounces, we send a strong message to the manufacturers.
I agree, and I think it is a good message. If you keep innovating and make high quality products, people will buy them. This isn’t a product for everyone (any more than an iPhone is a product for everyone) but I think it an option that will work for many. Even if I don’t buy it, I’m glad they made it.Feb 3, 2019 at 6:43 pm #3576589
Eric BBPL Member
I’d bet that warranty support is another major expense for Thermarest, especially for the lighter weight mattresses.Feb 3, 2019 at 6:47 pm #3576591
John VanceBPL Member
@servingkoLocale: Intermountain West
+1 No doubt the anticipated warranty claims are baked in to the cost which seems reasonable to me – the practice of baking in the warranty claims – everyone will decide for themselves is the price is reasonable and vote with their wallet.
Feb 9, 2019 at 4:47 am #3577603
- This reply was modified 2 weeks, 6 days ago by John Vance. Reason: Clarity
Hanz BBPL Member
+1 on warranty built in costs. And this is Therm-a-Rest let’s remember. If they found a 15d fabric that met their standards for a new product then I’m sure it’s high enough quality for me. I’m not sure why everyone is so confused about the price being higher. I mean its an UL branded item, like, yea, the price will be higher, unless you are in myog, which I my experience can be a wash anyway by the time you get it right.Feb 9, 2019 at 2:01 pm #3577633
Brad PBPL Member
If you put one in your cart selecting in store pick up at REI, the pick up date is 2/14.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.