The Search for a Fleece Replacement – A Close Look at Active Insulation and the role of MVTR
Sep 15, 2021 at 2:03 am #3727406Garett ABPL Member
I’d Love to second Brett Peugh’s kind request for a list if at all possible it would be a great resource. Thank You for Your time and energy! : PSep 18, 2021 at 1:54 pm #3727673Erik NorsemanBPL Member
Curious about the MTVR of the houdini air vs. houdini. I note that in this other paper of yours, the MVTR of the houdini is considerably lower than that stated in this article (about half the rate). Can you explain the difference, or where I may be mistaken in my comparison?
ErikSep 18, 2021 at 3:02 pm #3727685
Good observation. At the time that early article was written, my MVTR test was performed without an interior circulating fan. Shortly after that article was written, I introduced an interior circulating fan, This fan reduces the effective resistance to vapor transmission of the air layer between the top of the permeation kettle surface and the test garment. As a result, the measured MVTR went up for all subsequent tests. So, the values I have obtained under the present testing procedure for the Houdini is 2250 g/m2/24hr and, the Houdini Air is 3120 g/m2/24hr.Sep 18, 2021 at 6:44 pm #3727695
Stephen, Have you had a chance to test the Visp yet? Thanks.Sep 19, 2021 at 8:25 am #3727722Erik NorsemanBPL Member
Thank you!Sep 20, 2021 at 3:57 am #3727814wander lustBPL Member
Thank you for your eye-opening article Stephen.
Could you please tell us what are the best wind shirts in terms of mvtr with a low cfm?
Do you have the stats for the Black Diamond Alpine Start (2021) and the OR Helium Wind Hoodie?
ThxSep 27, 2021 at 8:30 pm #3728263
This is fascinating, thank you for your hard work and extensive testing.
Two notes – firstly, in the conclusion you say ” In the winter, temperatures rarely drop below 0 °F (18 °C). In the summer, temperatures can range from 30 °F to 90 °F (-1 °C to 32 °C).” I think that should be (-18°C) not 18°C – sorry I’m being pedantic…Secondly, in your opinion, how much difference would these findings be affected whilst cycling? Clearly you are often moving through the air at higher velocities so the air pressure differential would change significantly, thoughts?
Thanks again, Scott in New ZealandSep 28, 2021 at 3:38 pm #3728366
Thanks for reading.
I guess you have discovered that we don’t do metric in the US.
My conclusions about the ineffectiveness of air permeability is based on field use at hiking speeds, testing results and calculations of pressures at low speed or low air velocities, typically 3 mph. Clearly, as air speed increases due to increased forward speed or higher winds, garment air permeability can result in a greater contribution to cooling and moisture/vapor removal. But it is not always a slam/dunk. Penetrating air must be able to displace interior air. If interior air cannot escape than vapor or moisture removal may well remain inadequate and still require high MVTR.Sep 28, 2021 at 6:12 pm #3728373Shawn BeardenBPL Member
@shawnbLocale: SE Idaho
Wonderful work, Stephen. What a resource your analyses are! In your article on fleece, you listed R values. Here you talk about the importance of MVTR and air permeability. I wonder if you have MVTR and air permeability numbers for the fleeces you tested. I’m especially interested in fleeces like the Patagonia Micro D and the Decathlon Quechua MH100.Sep 28, 2021 at 7:05 pm #3728380
I have not done much testing of finished fleece garments. R-value tests require the guarded hot plate and that means the garment must be cut up to perform the test. When I did the Alpha Direct testing, I did test one fleece jacket I have to see how they compared for MVTR and air permeability. The problem is, I have no idea what weight fleece they are, and, as I found for at least Polartec fleece, the fabric weight had no bearing on warmth anyway. I have two fleece jackets and just measured the air permeability. One is pretty heavy and its air permeability is 253 CFM/Ft2. Its MVTR I measured previously and it is 2960 g/m2/24hr. Both measurements are much lower than Alpha direct fabrics. The second jacket is much lighter weight and its air permeability is 204 CFM/Ft2. The only place I wear fleece these days is in the house. In fact, I don’t do that much anymore. Mostly, I wear a Norona Falketind Octa. It is warmer than my heavy fleece jacket and just over half the weight. Very comfy.Sep 29, 2021 at 4:36 pm #3728426
So Stephen, or anyone who has done the cross referencing research here – for an ideal alpha combo (low CRM high MVTR?), whats on the top performers list? OR Helium Wind hoody? (very interesting)BD Alpine Start? (tad heavy?),Patagonia Houdini Air (CRM too high?), (MB Tachyon, etc)? If someone has already done the aggregate work, what’s the dream wind shirt? Thanks! (PS, returned my EE Visp before ever wearing it, figuring the DWR would be problematic).Sep 29, 2021 at 5:58 pm #3728430
For 3 season use, I carry a Montbell Shakedry jacket and a 2 layer 60g Alpha direct. That will change when winter arrives. I want a water proof breathable shell with the highest possible MVTR. I don’t want to carry a windshirt and a rain jacket. I want one jacket that will perform both functions. I want a midlayer for insulation only that provides great warmth to weight performance with as little resistance to vapor transfer as possible. There is no right answer to your question. That is because you are already assigning your values to a variety of choices and only you can decide which are best for the kind of hiking you do and the conditions in which you do them. Concerning DWR: Why do you think that EE’s DWR is inferior to every other brand? There are only two jackets that eliminate DWR. The Columbia solution has poor MVTR. The Gore Shakedry solution may suffer elevated wear. If you don’t like those choices, you will have DWR. All DWR will eventually fail. DWR must be maintained to support its functionality. Is one manufacturer’s DWR more likely to serve you better? I don’t know. Their are lots of reports of DWR failure. Why wouldn’t there be? We at BPL know it will occur. Lots of users probably don’t. Those users may have taken no steps to follow proper care instructions. However, unless those reports describe how a garment was used and how well it was maintained, you still don’t know if it would work for you. A friend of mine is doing the entire PCT. He has a new EE Visp for the trip. I am looking forward to his experience on this issue.Sep 29, 2021 at 7:14 pm #3728435
Thanks Stephen. I’m sure I’d like one shell for wind and rain too. Eventually. I appreciate all your research. As far as DWR, yes I realize and have experienced it’s limitations many times like most of us. Certainly proper care helps. Regarding the Visp, I look forward to your friends feedback as well. And why I’m a bit suspect of its DWR being perhaps inferior to others, a friend that was less then impressed and Philip Warner over at Section Hiker made me pause. It’s not an inexpensive shell, and I was hoping for one shell to accomplish both wind and rain functions, but decided to wait until something more promising, perhaps without DWR reliance, comes out.
Thanks again. Look forward to all you learn and share.Oct 13, 2021 at 6:47 pm #3729617Christopher SBPL Member
The Montbell results really surprise me – I expected it to be the complete opposite. Very interesting indeed.
The Thermal Airshed still interests me for no other reason than it might be a much more durable alternative to the Nano Air light hybrid – as much as I like those discontinued layers the loft in front seems to degrade very quickly.
Realistically I think everyone likely wants to maximize MVTR but air permeability will end up being a very personal thing – I run very warm so I prefer shells and insulation with much higher air permeability. If I am sweating profusely due to a complete lack of airflow (or not enough) I am pretty sure I am going to outpace the ability of even a high MVTR garment to dump moisture.Nov 7, 2021 at 9:57 pm #3731726
@Stephen Seeber ,
Any reason to think this would be any different for static insulation?
The traditional view has always been that membranes or coatings on a down jacket reduce breathability, thereby increasing the amount of moisture trapped in the down.
But as you mention, the plain fabrics have very low mvtr and air permeability, and membrane or coated options would seem likely to offer better mvtr while maintaining down proefjes and wind resistance.
What are your thoughts?Nov 8, 2021 at 6:59 am #3731738
Stephen, first of all, thank you for this very useful work you are doing!
my question is, if this is the case for active insulation, would the same not be true for ‘static’ insulation?
The current view has always been that adding membranes or coatings to the face fabrics of down jackets reduces breathability, leading to moisture build up inside.
However, your tests show, that at least for certain materials, membrane laminates can be more breathable than plain fabrics, especially the tightly woven and calendared fabrics used in down jackets.
Do you have any ideas about this? Any future testing planned for this?
Thank you againNov 8, 2021 at 5:14 pm #3731808
Hi Tijaard: Not quite sure what you are asking about, but I will take a stab at it. Many active insulation pieces are distinguished by low R-value, self supporting insulation and loose weave face fabrics. I suppose you can produce a high loft insulated jacket with a WPB membrane and light face fabric that might provide reasonable breathability. In fact, there are such jackets. I would rather have multiple layers that can be worn in whatever order meets the present conditions than one single jacket with high insulation values and a wpb membrane. Such a garment may work well in specific conditions but won’t work in a broad range of conditions. I hope that answers your question, but repost if not.Nov 8, 2021 at 6:27 pm #3731828
Hi Stephen, this is confusing given this conversation is across couple of companion threads! I think what Tijaard is asking is the same as what I was asking on the other thread. How is it that a WPB membrane can have a higher MVTR than a non coated tightly woven fabric? Like Tijaard my understanding is that you most definitely don’t want to use a WPB fabric on an insulated garment i.e. a down jacket due to the reduced breathability (MVTR) of that fabric. What your data is showing is quite the opposite, at least in the case of Shakedry. Is it because Shakedry is such an outlier in regards to MVTR?
Thanks, SNov 8, 2021 at 7:11 pm #3731849
Further to my last question, in the past I suspect that the MVTR of WPB membranes have been so bad that their rates were noticeably lower than uncoated tightly woven fabrics. Perhaps with the advent of high value MVTR WPB membranes insulated garments could use them instead?
Does calendaring a fabric completely seal up the holes? Could this explain the difference in MVTR?
SNov 8, 2021 at 7:38 pm #3731850
Yes, I meant what Scott said.
I was asking about regular high loft down or synthetic jackets (or sleepingbags/quilts) for low activity/rest.
For down parka’s and sleeping bags you need the most breathable fabric possible, s (because the vapor pressure differential on both sides of the fabric is so low, and down suffers when wet).
In the past, the thought was always that ‘plain’ fabrics were better at this. But your testing shows that some laminated membrane fabrics, or coated fabrics, achieve better mvtr than some ‘plain’ fabrics.
In other words:
- which (downproof) fabric has the highest mvtr?
- Is there any reason to suspect that the highest mvtr shell fabric is not the best choice for a down parka (or sleepingbag)?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.