You had best use pentagonal or decagonal geometries to design your tarp to get the full benefits of the Golden Section.
And/or use (portions of) 3D geometries with icosidodecahedral symmetry.
Also, the mid tarp I showed in a separate thread recently has a variety of Pythagorean Triangles woven through its proportions. This was for at least two reasons – firstly pragmatic, to get integer proportions by rectifying different Pythag Triangles to one another, and eventually converting to dimensions. This facilitated the design process (when not proving a complete distraction); I developed various Excel programs to help matters. Secondly, it was for reasons of symbolism, to incorporate cosmic proportions into the design, given my lengthy interest in Sacred Art and Architecture. Very challenging and satisfying, providing you don’t let the geometry take over; and of course respect the pragmatic relation to user needs and characteristics, and material/structural/functional constraints.
As is well known, da Vinci, Palladio, and Le Corbusier, among many others, used the Golden Proportion very effectively to relate architecture to the human dimension. Robert Lawlor’s book on Sacred Geometry (Thames and Hudson) is not a bad introduction to the noble art. Or anything by Keith Critchlow.
I’m sure some clever designer could exploit fractals to offer some sophisticated advantages to tarps (probably have already done so).
I have also been interested in the intentional use of asymmetry in tents and tarps to provide enhanced facility, must post about that soon.