Topic

Tests say claimed backpack volumes not even close


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Tests say claimed backpack volumes not even close

Viewing 2 posts - 26 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3830061
    Paul S
    BPL Member

    @pula58

    Although my Seek Outside Unaweep 4800 is my best overall backpack to date, its 4800 cubic inch spec (78 liters)  pack seems to hold noticeably less stuff than my previous pack (which was sadly very uncomfortable), a Granite Gear Blaze 60. The “60 liter” pack seems to have more capacity than the 78 liter pack. I have noticed this over the years: Pack volumes, like shoe/boot sizes, don’t mean the exact same thing across different manufacturers. I am not knocking either company here, just noticing from repeated use.

    #3830126
    Brad W
    BPL Member

    @rocko99

     

    This stuff sack is less than 6L, it’s 5.6L. 12″ tall x 6″ diameter. I agree those ULA pockets are no where near that.

    https://zpacks.com/products/medium-stuff-sack

Viewing 2 posts - 26 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Loading...