I’m curious to hear from those who have used dyneema tarps and whether their exp has been positive or negative. Do you use it as a main shelter for hammocking and cowboy camping or as a porch for a tent, or as a hangout area? Do you prefer a flat rectangle cut or a hex cat cut or some other shape? How large is your tarp?
I only realized recently that Dyneema is made in 8.5 ft sheets so that’s why you mostly only see it going to a width of 8.5′. Of course there are exceptions like the Zpacks 13×10 Big Ass Tarp but that is created from 3 pieces bonded together.
I’m not a hammock guy so I know that influences one’s use case. I would like to try cowboy camping this winter, but my typical use case is placing a tarp over part or sometimes all of a tent to provide a porch area in front of the main door during rain or snow storms. I usually make a fire – either open or with a small firepit so I have to be careful of embers and wind. If it’s not raining, the fire has to be further from the edge of the tarp. It’s easier to move a firepit as needed for rain starting or stopping and it helps to limit the size of the fire to control ember production.
I don’t plan on using it as a main shelter (except for a rare bit of cowboy camping) so I don’t mind the translucence. That’s even a good thing since rainy or snowy conditions have less light.
I don’t think the rain sound would bother me too much. I imagine loosening the pitch or adding small lengths of shock cord to guylines can reduce this. I know the lack of stretch makes a bit of shock cord helpful in case you snag a guyline – since the tarp has so little give.
I see Dutchware has a Hex tarp. They are sold out of the thinner fabric. Do most people think it’s better to go with the thinner fabric for a tarp? I lean that way. I don’t want to buy the thicker fabric and later regret not getting the thinner. It comes in an 11 or 12 foot length. But it only adds 7/10 of an oz to go with the thicker .75oz fabric over the .55oz. The larger pack size of the thicker fabric is something to consider as well. The 12 foot hex in .75oz fabric is 8.5oz. If I go for a cat cut hex tarp and dyneema only goes to 8.5′ wide, I figure I might as well go for a 12ft ridgeline for a tiny bit of extra weight. All my tarps have been flat rectangle or square shaped. I’ve never had a hex or catenary cut tarp.
Zpacks 8×10′ flat tarp is the other contender that appeals to me. Just 6.4oz with the .51oz fabric. But it only comes in olive drab. I prefer the white color of the Dutchware Hex.
One use case is when there is heavy snow; My hope is that with an A-Frame ridgeline and the sides pitched low, snow will not build up on the tarp. In rain, I could use the pull outs more readily to give more lateral space.
I already have several Aquaquest Guide tarps in various sizes. The Anda El Jefe 8×10 silpoly is my lightest tarp. I tend to reach for 10×10’s because I like the extra margin. I do sometimes use a 10×12 or 10×13. I have used a 12×12 and even a 15×15 as well but they are rather heavy for anything beyond glamping or car trips. The Anda only weighs 12.5oz and packs very small.
I tend to think I’d be afraid of using a dyneema tarp because of ember holes from fires. They can be patched with DCF tape but still that seems a lot more tragic on a $400 or more piece of fabric than on one that only weighs about 5-8oz more but costs 1/2 to 1/4th as much.
I hardly NEED a new tarp. The weight of a comparable non-dyneema tarp with similar coverage is only about an additional 4-6oz. But these tarps are more fragile. The sturdy and reliable Aquaquest 40D Guide is 21oz for a 10×10 and 29oz for a 13×10. So the Guide would be about 12-18oz heavier depending on size. But the incremental weight savings of dyneema over my lightest tarps would be very small. Spending $400 to shave 4-6oz off my minimum base weight is getting ludicrous. I can probably enjoy having a fire a lot more without using a dyneema tarp.

In Harriman State Park

