Topic

Talk me out of bringing binoculars on the Wonderland trail

Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)
AK Granola BPL Member
PostedJul 25, 2026 at 8:14 pm

I almost always regret bringing binoculars on a long backpacking trip. Even at 10 ounces, I end up with them in the pack most of the day, because we’re making miles and not pausing to look. Only in camp are they used and even then I’m so tired I just eat and sleep. But I’m so tempted to bring them, once again! If you’ve done this trail would you bring them? Wildlife, birds, views…worth a closer look?

lee kingry BPL Member
PostedJul 25, 2026 at 8:28 pm

I carried a under 2 oz monocular on part of the PCT and the JMT and do not regret the extra weight. There were multiple times where I was able to either look ahead or look back at people on the trail and distance. Along with animal spotting and some unique long distance views. I usually don’t carry it on the the AT, but anywhere out west I’m pretty sure I will always pack it.

Jerry Adams BPL Member
PostedJul 26, 2026 at 7:56 am

my phone takes better pictures than I can see through binoculars.  10X zoom.  I’ll take a picture of something, like mountain goats far away I can’t resolve visually, then zoom in on the picture and they’re quite clear

the phone is subsuming everything

Brad A BPL Member
PostedJul 26, 2026 at 8:48 am

my phone takes better pictures than I can see through binoculars. 10X zoom. I’ll take a picture of something, like mountain goats far away I can’t resolve visually, then zoom in on the picture and they’re quite clear

the phone is subsuming everything

I suppose it depends what you use binoculars for, and the quality of the binoculars you use. If you’re just trying to see ahead for route finding, sure a phone might be the lighter alternative. But for nature observation there is nothing a phone can do that a quality binocular will do better in terms of pure viewing pleasure. And at the end of the day finding pleasure in the natural world is what backpacking is mostly about.

Jerry Adams BPL Member
PostedJul 26, 2026 at 11:39 am

I have some binoculars that are pretty good.  I can resolve details with my phone better.

Perhaps the experience of looking through binoculars real time is better

Of course there are telescopes that are much better but they are heavier

Brad A BPL Member
PostedJul 26, 2026 at 12:15 pm

I have some binoculars that are pretty good.  I can resolve details with my phone better.

Perhaps the experience of looking through binoculars real time is better

Of course there are telescopes that are much better but they are heavier

Telescope? I think you’re referring to a spotting scope – a different animal entirely.

I have a new iphone. In no way does it resolve detail as well as my binoculars, but I don’t own cheap binoculars so there is that.

Again, you have only yourself to please. But the ability to sit and watch, for instance, a nanny mountain goat with its kid feeding on a cliff in real time isn’t an experience a cell phone can replicate.

But the caveat HYOH always applies…

 

Jerry Adams BPL Member
PostedJul 26, 2026 at 3:34 pm

With the binoculars you can continuously watch wildlife.  If you take a picture with phone and look at it there’s a delay – you might miss some action.

I frequently see some white dots and wonder if it’s a mountain goat or something.  Picture with 10x zoom allows me to determine whether it is or not.

I was with someone and they wondered where there kid was.  There were some dots way away but no way you could tell.  10x zoom picture easily resolved that it was their kid.

I just like replacing an object that weighs something with my phone I’m taking anyway.

Yeah, HYOH for sure.

Dustin V BPL Member
PostedJul 27, 2026 at 7:14 am

+1 for a monocular. I carry mine in a front pocket and am able to quickly pop it out and focus.

AK Granola BPL Member
PostedJul 27, 2026 at 7:49 am

I don’t think there will be much sit and watching, but I bought an inexpensive monocular, 3 ounces with the case. I’ll just have to see if I miss my actual good binoculars, and wish I’d carried another 7 ounces instead! Thanks for the suggestions.

Todd T BPL Member
PostedJul 27, 2026 at 7:55 am

If you like having binoculars, take binoculars.  Ten ounces is a lot for something you don’t need and rarely use, but “worth it” for something you use (even for fun) a lot.  Maybe you don’t need to be talked out of your binocs, but need ideas of how to keep them at the ready while you hike.  Is there a binocular analogue of the Peak Design clip that keeps my camera ready for a quick draw?

Jerry Adams BPL Member
PostedJul 27, 2026 at 8:30 am

I think binoculars have to be fairly heavy to be very good optically

I got mine from someone that designs binoculars.  They are supposedly fairly good.  They weigh 25 ounces.  When I look across a distance at some detail, like the mortar on bricks on a chimney, I can see it with the binoculars.  With unaided eyes I can only see that it’s a chimney.

With 10x lens I can see details on the mortar I can’t see with binoculars.

But, each person and equipment is different.  Try it yourself.  Look at some detail far away.

I would think 3 ounce binoculars would be no better than unaided eye.

 

David Sugeno BPL Member
PostedJul 27, 2026 at 3:09 pm

I think binoculars have to be fairly heavy to be very good optically

Or very expensive.  My Swarovski CL Pocket 8x25s are fantastic, and only weight about 12 ounces.  But I paid about $850 for them.  I’m a lifelong birder, so they’re worth every penny to me.

Jerry Adams BPL Member
PostedJul 27, 2026 at 3:37 pm

my binoculars say 8 x 42 WO field 7.0 degrees.  I wonder if that’s good.  The lenses are 1 5/8 inches – I think that’s important

Brad A BPL Member
PostedJul 27, 2026 at 10:38 pm

 

I think binoculars have to be fairly heavy to be very good optically

Not true.

Brad A BPL Member
PostedJul 27, 2026 at 10:44 pm

I don’t think there will be much sit and watching, but I bought an inexpensive monocular, 3 ounces with the case. I’ll just have to see if I miss my actual good binoculars, and wish I’d carried another 7 ounces instead! Thanks for the suggestions.

Ms. Granola, please report back your monocular experience. I’ve contemplated getting one and will be interested in your thoughts.

Have a great trip!

Don Montierth BPL Member
PostedJul 28, 2026 at 9:23 am

I carry a Brunton Echo monocular. Very light (1.6 oz) and reasonable optical quality. 7×18.

Nick Gatel BPL Member
PostedJul 28, 2026 at 10:23 am

I’ve never met a backpacker who regularly carries binoculars. To me this seems odd, because a compact binocular can be such a useful tool. Back around 2008, I stopped taking binoculars on most trips for about five years, because I was too focused on the weight of my gear. On most trips, binoculars were not a critical “keep me alive” piece of equipment. After realizing my mistake, I, again, now carry compact binoculars on almost every trip.

But I am still in the infinitesimal minority. If you never, or infrequently take binoculars backpacking, perhaps this might be a good time to re-consider. How is it that we can’t find time to stop and explore our environment from a distance? How is it that 10 or 12 ounces is too much weight for something that can provide hours of enjoyment on a multi-day trip?

A few years ago I spent a few hours observing the Pleiades with a 6.9 oz. 8×24 binocular while lying in my sleeping bag. The next morning I enjoyed my breakfast while observing a colony of ants. On another trip I was able to pick out a big horn ram and then move in much closer for a great picture. On a couple of occasions they have helped me find water in the desert. The list goes on and on.

Brad A BPL Member
PostedJul 28, 2026 at 11:37 am

I haven’t been without binoculars in my pack for decades. Were I doing a long thru hike I wouldn’t take them, but for normal trips they always come. My wife also carries her own.

8.95 oz’s of joy…

 

 

Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)
Loading...