Roger said,
At the first approximation, the order of placement does not matter as the R-values are additive.
One thing when I started doing this, I thought that having the cold snow against the air mat might cause the air in it to condense faster, whereas a foam pad might help slow it down or even prevent much of it. At least that was my mindset. So I was happy how things worked out for me and saw no need to change.
When I started reading in the past few years that it was better to put the foam on top, I thought, this doesn’t sound right. But I didn’t even try. I was happy with my system. Changing my method wasn’t going to lighten my pack weight and the possible improvement wasn’t going to allow me to take less insulation, so I saw no reason to change.
Sometimes we just need to look at things and say to ourselves, “Does this make sense?”
Also, when backpacking I often look at things from the standpoint of is this the most efficient or productive way to use my gear. For example, we are told that short wide pots are better than tall ones (Caldera Cones excepted). That might be true in many cases, but often short wide pots make packing and organizing gear less efficient. Whenever possible I use a pot that can hold my stove and fuel, with little or no extra space left inside. That may not be the most effective stove pot combination, but often it makes it easier to operate in the field day after day. Again, as Paul pointed out, each of us has to experiment and figure out what works best for us.
So if anyone is on the fence about sleeping pads, experiment. When you figure out what method works for you, stick to it.