Selling Public Lands Without a Vote: The Quiet Enclosure of the Commons

[Ryan Jordan]

Companion forum thread to: Selling Public Lands Without a Vote: The Quiet Enclosure of the Commons

Public lands won’t be “sold” in a televised vote. They’ll be enclosed through deleted sentences, vanished comment periods, and lawmakers who stay silent while appointees treat the commons like inventory. The antidote is stepping out of political jerseys and applying relentless pressure on elected officials – before the bulldozers arrive.

[Terran]

Honestly the concept of owning land eludes me. We’re only here for a short while.

I call weekly. Sometimes daily. Sometimes it feels hopeless, then I remember, that’s how they want us to feel. Short of civil unrest, there will be many years of lawsuits and boycotts against the opportunists. Hopefully this next year will show some change in governance. Commoners have a right to exist and to use the land to which they are born.

[Terran]

Kuiu is off of my list.

https://www.outdoorlife.com/hunting/private-equity-group-buys-kuiu/

[Ryan Jordan]

The James C. (“Cox”) Kennedy land dispute on Montana’s Ruby River (see Terran Terran’s link above for context) hits pretty close to me. I’ve floated and fished the section of the Ruby through this land since before he purchased it. When he purchased the land, the Montana Stream Access Law protected that right of way, and public access to it. He would have known this when he bought it, of course. Then, in 2004, “no tresspassing” signs and barbed wire/electric fences were erected to block that public access – which was a violation of public law. The dispute ended up in the courts, and the Montana Supreme Court eventually ruled in favor of the public and the Stream Access Law, but it created years of ugly and unnecessary conflict between landowners and the public.

In addition to Kennedy, many “pro-conservation” landowners in Montana are incredibly wealthy. Do they do good things for “conservation”? Of course. They donate a ton of money and time, and yes, they do use their influence to move the needle forward for conservation initiatives. Examples: Charles Schwab, Tom Brokaw, Huey Lewis, James Kennedy, Ted Turner, Greg Gianforte, the list is much, much longer than this.

All of the above-named landowners own publicly accessible waterways, all of which I’ve accessed numerous times, with varying degrees of conflict on each of these properties. There are remote security cameras, professional (armed) security teams, rough-around-the-edges ranch hands who haven’t really been to diplomacy school. All of them have had a reputation (if not documented evidence) to keep the public out, because they (generally) believe that public access to waterways that have long been recognized as part of the public trust in Montana is unconstitutional and a violation of landowners’ rights and a dilution of their property value.

However… conservation and public lands access advocacy are not the same thing. Many wealthy conservationists believe that the privatization of public lands is the best means towards an idealized version of conservation. Turner et al. are well known to have this view.

Can someone be pro-conservation and anti-right-to-access even when that right is granted?

Yes, and that’s what makes all this so messy, complicated, and painful for the public. What undermines public trust is that most wealthy landowners are unwilling to engage the public in a transparent, collaborative, and respectful way. Erecting electric fences and hiding barbed wire across rivers to rip inflatable boats (a wanton tactic on public-access waterways running through private land in Montana) makes commoners feel disrespected when they are exercising rights legally granted.

Instead, they will exercise their influence through means not available to most commoners, whether legal or political.

Enjoying my rights as a Montanan in 2011 during a packraft float on a public right-of-way through one of the property owners’ lands mentioned earlier:

And FWIW, you need a fairly hefty pair of wire cutters to get through barbed wire efficiently. The Felco  CDO is about 9 oz.

[Terran]

James Cox ran against Monroe.

 

[Terran]

https://www.eenews.net/articles/fws-chief-orders-comprehensive-review-of-wildlife-refuges/

[Jerry Adams]

I was listening to a podcast, I forget which

There’s a checkerboard pattern of private and public land.  In order to get from one public square to the next, you have to go to a corner and carefully step from one to the other.  Your body will briefly be over the private land, but you can avoid stepping on it.  Like if you want to move like a bishop, going from one black square, diagonally, to the next black square.

Some hunter carefully did this, but the private land owner got law enforcement to arrest the hunter for trespassing.  Court case.  The court said it was legal.

Interesting how the rich landowner can corrupt law enforcement into doing their work.

[Terran]

BLM land has many strategically placed ranches blocking access.

On corner crossing. It varies by state.

Corner crossing.

[JVD]

@Ryan. I appreciate this piece. I hope it reaches a wider audience than just BPL.

[Author]

Posts