“Cheap? I don’t see anything the least bit cheap about 7d tents on the market, at least as far as price goes. Cheap in construction and materials perhaps.”
Monte, you are right, and my thought was poorly expressed. I put so much time and effort into each tent, even if it is not done from scratch but is a modification, I could not imagine making a number of tents for different conditions. An exception would be a winter tent; but snow travel for me would only happen if starting a longer trek in the Rockies where there is often a lot of snow in June or even July.  But would not call that winter trekking, it is just that an early start is needed due to shorter summers. Although that may be changing due to global warming.
So I could not imagine having a bunch of tents to swap out for different conditions, as too much goes into each tent. Hence, buying a bunch of cheap tents is the only way I’d imagine that approach. Kudos to you and others who are able to create a variety of MYOG tents. But the only option for me is to build a tent that can cover a broader spectrum of conditions, last a number of years of moderate trekking, and meet the worse conditions that may reasonably be expected.
From reading what you and others have posted about the RBTR 7D, a tent using it would fill a pretty small niche; thus not be worth the time and effort, the value of which far exceeds dollar costs. And that sounds much like the situation of many who do MYOG tents. While I love MYOG, there are just a lot of other enjoyable things in life. I’ve already taken some heat for the amount of time spent in the workshop, and it was probably justified.
That may mean carrying a tent that turns out to be heavier than necessary if the weather is super; but my experience is that the weather often is not, and that it is often not possible to anticipate the really nasty storms. So the approach has been to have one good tent that can handle a wide range of conditions, and still try to build it as light as possible. By the time it wears out, a slew of ideas have already developed for the next tent, and the design and construction begins again in earnest.
While I don’t mind a slightly heavier tent to make it more versatile, the effort is still to make it as light as possible. And there are other ways besides lighter fabrics to do that. Design, for example, will help if the number of stakes required can be reduced to around 4. Or if the number of all the little parts can be reduced. I like to design tents that if not totally freestanding, are at least self-supporting; the purpose being to lighten the stakes by reducing the pressure on them when the wind is howling. Aerodynamics, with walls that tend more to the horizontal than vertical reduce that pressure also, but also requires walls that are partially convex to provide decent internal space. (That is where I part with tents that are close to bivies. I want to be able to live comfortably in a tent, including cooking and eating during storms.) Carbon poles can be very light and provide self-support; but only if designed to reinforce each other, unlike the two hoop wedge domes that put tremendous stress on the hoops in high winds.
Am just saying that ever lighter fabrics are not the only significant way to make serious inroads into weight, and other approaches should be brought into the mix.  Failure to do that is IMO what got us into the race to the bottom fabric weight, which led to the excessive prices of DCF. I think it was one of the early BPL members who suggested something like ‘what next, saran wrap’?