Discussions of active insulation always focus on the key advantage of breathability, which supposedly affords a wider temperature range compared to traditional jackets with tighter shells. How come no one mentions that most traditional down and synthetic puffy jackets come with the ultimate in breathable features, a full-length zipper? (The same principle applies to rain gear, where pit zips are often more important than fabric breathability.) And if unzipping your jacket to dump all your core heat isn’t enough, just take it off. Why would I want an “active insulation” garment that is heavier and bulkier for same warmth? (The only exception would be for sports enthusiasts, like racers or mountain climbers, who may not have time to adjust their jacket.) Am I missing something?
Topic
Question about active insulation
Become a member to post in the forums.
- This topic has 5 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 4 months ago by .
One of my favorite pieces of winter gear is, seriously, the military winter coat liner. The OD green one with button closure and the holes in the armpits. It’s the holes in the arm pits I love. I have other insulation I can use if it’s cold, but this piece is a great layering piece that allows my body to stay warm while venting excess heat if I match this piece with a shell that also has pit zips. It’s the only insulated piece I have found that has addressed this. I prefer this to fully unzipping, especially if it’s windy.
Your logic seems fuzzy to me. Having said that, yes, you’re missing something.
By that approach a down parka can be active insulation if your only willing to unzip/take it off.
I’ve moved to carrying active insulation almost exclusively for summer and shoulder season trips. I like the fact that I can get to camp and toss the Nano Air over the clothes I wore during the hike that inevitably are somewhat sweaty, and I can be warm and dry out at the same time. My down puffy always left me feeling damp and crappy, and by extension not that warm. Even unzipping the down in front left my back damp, which worked its way into the insulation. I can also wear the active insulation under a hardshell in the driving rain and keep moving (at a slower pace) and stay comfortable. With down or synthetic puffies using calendared face fabrics, this was miserable.
It may not be for everyone in all climates, but in damp coastal Alaska active insulation is the shizzle.
I don’t really want to spend the day putting a down jacket constantly on and then off: getting hot and sweaty with it on and then chilled with it off. Even when you unzip a down jacket, you’ll get hot pits,shoulders, and back. The jacket will get sweaty and loose loft over time too.
While the down jacket might sound good in theory, it just doesn’t work too well.
I’m usually walking in my baselayer. A breathable fleece is only used occasionally; I can usually get by without it. The down jacket can work in an emergency with a slowed pace. But if you know you are going to be walking in insulation, a down jacket is a bad choice.
+1 to the military coat liner
Become a member to post in the forums.

