Topic

Personal Locator Beacon vs In Reach type communicators

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Phong D BPL Member
PostedJul 6, 2020 at 2:29 pm

Hello, on my recent Oregon thru-hike I noticed that most people were now carrying In-Reach and Spot type communicators.  I had always thought Personal Locator Beacons were the better choice, because they communicated directly to the NOAA Search and Rescue network and they had sealed dedicated batteries.  I would always worry that I would use the Spot/In-Reach to communicate, and the batteries would not be available if I really needed it.

Are those concerns valid?  What are your thoughts.  My battery is about to expire so I will either replace it or get a new system.  Oh, I should add that money and subscription fee’s are not of concern.  I know the PLB’s are cheaper in that regard but I would like whatever system is better regardless.  Dying is also the cheapest option but I dont want to do that!

 

 

Thanks.

PostedJul 6, 2020 at 3:53 pm

Please consider doing a search for this info, which has been discussed in detail many times.

Jerry Adams BPL Member
PostedJul 6, 2020 at 4:17 pm

yeah, many threads

I got inreach a while ago based on recommendations here.  You can send text back and forth.  You can let family know things are okay.  You can tell SAR the nature of your problem.

Rex Sanders BPL Member
PostedJul 6, 2020 at 6:00 pm

I bought an inReach SE in 2013, and inReach mini in 2019. I don’t worry much about having enough battery charge to push the SOS button.

I keep an eye on the charge, and the devices warn you as battery gets low. When you get below 10%, if you turn off the entire unit, you’ll still be able to turn it back on and push the SOS button. I only had to shutdown like that that once, near the end of an 8-day trip where I didn’t bring a USB battery for recharging.

Which is another option. If you bring a USB brick to recharge phones, headlamps, or cameras anyway, all you need is a common cable to recharge a dead inReach enough to push SOS.

And the inReach can do things a PLB can’t.

My wife really values knowing that I’m alive and well in the wilderness via text messages and tracking. I value leaving tracks in case I’m badly injured and can’t push an SOS button.

— Rex

M B BPL Member
PostedJul 12, 2020 at 3:40 pm

Ive brought plb  couple times when going where not many people and no cell service.

 

Normally i dont.  I have it anyway for  fishing offshore….it stays in pfd pocket.

 

To me….being out of touch….brings heightened sense of self reliance…part of what wilderness  hiking is about.

David Thomas BPL Member
PostedJul 13, 2020 at 12:34 am

I found the SPOT transmitters to be SPOTty in their coverage and often an “I’m okay” message wouldn’t get out.  So I switched to a PLB for better coverage here in Alaska.  Mostly, I don’t bring either, but something like the Brooks Range or the Aleutians and I do sometimes.

I’ve gotten BPLers air-freighted a replacement tent in remote Alaska because they had an InReach.  It didn’t improve MY quality of life that week – I was busy enough as it was, but was a major help for them.

OTOH, I’m NEVER in an open boat or bush plane without my PFD on and my PFD has a VHF, PLB, blade, cordage, and fire starting gear in it at all times.  Because after the plane crashes (not yet) or the boat sinks (that has happened), you’re washed up on some beach, cold and wet.

I didn’t actually hit the PLB button because we weren’t in a bad way and I didn’t want the USGC to launch during a storm but used the VHF to broadcast a mayday to passing ships, one of which picked us up.

John S. BPL Member
PostedJul 13, 2020 at 12:27 pm

PLBs are better if you value your life. Inreach is better if you are addicted to social media. You decide. (said tongue in cheek…joking)

Todd T BPL Member
PostedJul 13, 2020 at 3:57 pm

I’d agree with @jshann, though I’m not sure I’d need to cheek my tongue. :-)

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Loading...