Not what I was hoping for:
“Our initial impressions of the Patagonia Micro Puff were very strong, but we were a little less enthused once it came to cold weather testing. Wearing it back-to-back with a range of jackets, including the new The North Face Ventrix, Patagonia’s Nano-Air and Nano Puff, and a host of lightweight down pieces, the Micro Puff offered decidedly less insulation. The 65-gram PlumaFill synthetic has the puffy feel of premium goose down or duck clusters, but you just don’t get nearly the same cozy warmth. We rank the jacket’s overall warmth at a little less than the Patagonia Nano Puff, which features 60-gram PrimaLoft. It is important to note that the Micro Puff is 4.3 ounces lighter than the Nano, so this is a notable accomplishment. But held up to the standards of down jackets like the Arc’teryx Cerium LT or Patagonia Ultralight, the Micro Puff comes up well short.”
“It’s always difficult to assign a temperature range for an insulated piece, but we found the Micro Puff kept us reasonably comfortable into approximately the mid 40s Fahrenheit with a thin baselayer underneath. This makes it a suitable option for use around camp on lower elevation summer backpacking….”
“We love insulated layers that can be worn every day of the week, and the decision to go with such a paper-thin shell does have an impact on usability. The rest of the jacket fits the bill for wearing around town—plenty of storage, high quality and smooth operating zippers, good Patagonia looks and comfort, and a nice fit—but the limited durability means this expensive jacket likely will be kept on a hanger in between backcountry trips.”
Â
See entire review at https://www.switchbacktravel.com/reviews/patagonia-micro-puff-hoody