As for the risk part, to explain where it becomes problematic. Two scenarios:
Scenario 1 – Non-Problematic Risk Taking
a) I see a risky situation and think: there is a perceived risk but I know have the physical and mental capabilities and experience to mitigate the risk to a low level. It is unlikely I will get injured and will most likely not die. I’m going to engage.
b) I see a risky situation and think: there is a perceived risk, I’m not on my ‘A’ game today and it is likely I could get injured or killed. I am not going to engage in that today.
Or
Scenario 2 – Problematic Risk Taking Behaviors
I see a risky situation engage in it where:
a) do not have the capacity to identify the potential risk or mitigate it.
b) recognize the risk and am unclear if I can mitigate it and don’t care if I can’t or hope that I don’t.
c) see the risky situation and intentionally plan on not mitigating the risk for the sake of the thrill and/or a lack of desire to preserve self.
Or some combination of all three.
As you can see, risk is then on a sliding scale. My risk might be greater or lesser than someone else’s depending on my mental and physical capabilities. My ability to safely participate in ‘risky’ activities may change day to day. Engaging in ‘risky’ activities is different for each individual. What is low risk for me, might be high risk for someone with less experience, physical aptitude, or mental awareness or vice versa.