I had considered the Montbell Chameece, but was lured away by the typo at Mountain Hardwear.
I also looked at a full-zip hoody by Haglöfs, which purports to be over an ounce lighter than the Montbell one, and has a hood.
There is the L.I.M. Power Dry hoody, which is discontinued, and its apparent successor (I think) the L.I.M. Mid hoody, which no longer uses Polartec Power Dry, but a different material called PonteTorto Technostretch.
Claimed weights:
Power Dry: 186g (6.6oz)
Technostretch: 7oz (198g)
I might order both (if I can find the Power Dry version anywhere) and assess the merits of each.
The marketing spin at PonteTorto sounds promising, but so does most marketing spin. http://pontetorto.it/en/sport-system/tecnostretch/
I do question whether breathability is preserved with a smoother outer surface on fleece in general, compared to the traditional “bumpy” fleece texture, because I would have thought the greater surface area of a bumpy exterior would aid in evaporation to the next layer. Anyone know, or have data/physics? Is the opposite true for insulation: lower surface area (smooth outer) == improved heat retention? What about temp of trapped air at surface of bumpy fleece? I fell like I am going down a rabbit hole…
If the material is more efficient at insulating than the Montbell’s Chameece fleece, then the lighter, thinner material could still make a decent light mid layer.
The short cut of the torso on the Montbell appeals to me for cycling because it will bunch less under my wind layer (leaning forward) in freezing temps. But the short arms are equally unappealing for the same activity.
Sizing up is not always best option because the chest/shoulders/etc may no longer be correct.