Craig has it right, as regards my aversion to ketosis. I just don’t see it as being a very healthy state to be in constantly. I am currently carrying 1 pound of food per day that yields ~1900 calories, 1200 of them carbohydrate, and it has worked out very well for me. My organizing principle is to carry enough carbs to efficiently burn body fat, without going into ketosis. I have been experimenting for years with this and have gradually dialed my requirement in at ~30% carbs, 65% fat, and the exercise physiology constant of 5% protein. On a recent 7 day hike that included a traverse of rugged Gardner Basin, I lost 7 pounds, most of which was body fat, without any of the metallic mouth and sluggishness that indicates ketosis. Works for me.
@ Jen: Yes, we could very definitely have a conversation about excessive carb consumption by a disgustingly sedentary American population, and I would agree with you 100%. It is a distortion of a natural mammalian preference for carbs when they are available, for the simple reason that they provide quick energy critical to survival in the fight or flight, tooth and claw environment in which they(including us) have evolved over millions of years. Witness what bears will go through to obtain honey, or lately chocolate, gummy bears, etc. Other mammals as well, as has been demonstrated in countless lab experiments. And then there are the honeybees, many other insects, and many birds. Carbs are also necessary to facilitate the efficient metabolism of fat in humans, and, I presume, other mammals. Yes, you can obtain energy from fat with a less than optimal supply of carbs, but it is not as efficient, and is much harder on the kidneys, because additional protein will be required for gluconeogenesis to supply at least a minimal amount of carbohydrate. The nitrogen stripped from the protein molecules will have to be eliminated through the kidneys. Everything I have read about athletic performance during ketosis indicates it is pretty much limited to much longer, slower endurance events. That makes sense to me simply because fat requires a far greater amount of O2 to oxidize it. This puts an athlete who is in ketosis(incompletely oxidized fat) at a disadvantage when competing with athletes of equal cardio vascular capacity who include carbs in their metabolic input, as long as carbs are available. In an unsupported environment, ketosis adapted athletes would have an advantage, but I would submit that an unsupported environment in modern times is analogous to a starvation situation back in our hunter gatherer days, and not what the hunters and gatherers would have preferred. If they were caught out by an unfriendly group who was “carbed up”, they would have been at a potentially fatal disadvantage. That is my take on the issue. I note that Jenn mentioned carbing up at night, which I interpret as glycogen replenishment sufficient to support the next day’s hiking at a pace that allowed the efficient metabolism of primarily body fat, supported by an adequate supply of glucose from stored muscle glycogen.
On a technical note related to timely posting. My belated response to this thread is due to the fact that I am unable to receive PMs, or notification of new posts to threads I am subscribed to and have “favorited”. Manage is well aware of my plight, has been for some time, and yet nothing has been done to remedy the situation. I am mentioning it once again, in a public forum, in the hope that at some point they will be shamed into doing something about it. It is indefensible. Period.