Topic

Lightest Camp shoes

Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 116 total)
Fifty Weekends BPL Member
PostedOct 24, 2024 at 12:17 am

I have fit kicks as well. They are very thin, but they have real rubber soles so men’s 10.5 weighs 9.4 oz for the pair. I think the main benefit of these is that they are packable.

PostedOct 24, 2024 at 6:32 am

Hey Brad,
My fitkicks are 180g – 6.35oz. Roughly women’s size 7 1/2. I have worn them in the snow- with waterproof socks. Worked fine, but i thought id cut some inner soles out of closed cell foam next time. Bit cold under foot

Thanks Megan, that’s helpful :)

 

PostedOct 24, 2024 at 6:33 am

I have fit kicks as well. They are very thin, but they have real rubber soles so men’s 10.5 weighs 9.4 oz for the pair. I think the main benefit of these is that they are packable.

Thanks Fifty…

Erik Hagen BPL Member
PostedOct 24, 2024 at 9:06 am

Love the pack-ability of fit kicks but they retain water.  I use them for travel but prefer EVA for backpacking for this reason.

JG H BPL Member
PostedOct 24, 2024 at 1:26 pm

@bradmacmt

My girlfriend has that same scale. Be cautious weighing anything that hangs over the edges bc as the floating silver scale portion pushes down, those black rigid edges can start taking on some of the weight and throw off the results. I’m not saying that’s happening with your new slides, but it might be. You can put a bowl on the scale first, hit the Zero button and wait for it to reset to 0, and then add the shoes to get the proper weight.

PostedOct 24, 2024 at 4:45 pm

@jgh4 – You’re correct, and I understand this.

I used two different scales to measure the slides. The larger one is a baking scale and handles large items. The slides weigh the same on both scales.

Bill Budney BPL Member
PostedOct 25, 2024 at 6:57 pm

That is 4.6 oz per shoe, so twice the weight of the EVA slides.

But it looks like a better shoe.

Nicholas P BPL Member
PostedOct 25, 2024 at 8:11 pm

Bill , that makes sense it did seem like that weight was too little to be true given what they are.

I had  seen a review that said it was per pair but I guess it does say per a shoe  right on  their website -don’t know how I missed that.

Fifty Weekends BPL Member
PostedNov 6, 2024 at 12:38 pm

I took Erik’s idea for adding a “sport mode” and actually just permanently attached the paracord to EVA slides. These are 3.9 oz for size 10.5 feet. I used a standard fabric hole punch to make the holes in the EVA so hopefully it won’t tear. I’ll see how these work out as I’m heading to Hawaii this month, so far they feel secure.

David D BPL Member
PostedNov 6, 2024 at 5:02 pm

Looks great.  3mm shock cord works well too, I like the little bit of extra give from it

JG H BPL Member
PostedNov 7, 2024 at 6:38 pm

Just saw those, too. Interesting. Hoping they’ll make one with a back (think: Sanuk).

Roger Caffin BPL Member
PostedNov 7, 2024 at 9:11 pm

But no mention of the two lightest option – both weighing zero grams. Why?

* Go barefoot – very nice on grassy terrain, and OK on sheet rock too. Works fine on many rivers too.

* Remove all socks and put low-cut joggers back on. without any socks, my shoes feel very roomy. Being 100% synthetic, it does not matter if they get wet.

David Sugeno BPL Member
PostedNov 10, 2024 at 7:37 pm

But no mention of the two lightest option – both weighing zero grams. Why?

Maybe because that wasn’t the question.  :)

I just got a ZPacks email about this new product which I ordered: Ultralight Camp Shoes

Please report back once you get them.  These look like they might be a winner.

Sherwood B BPL Member
PostedNov 13, 2024 at 6:06 pm

I ordered and received the new zpacks UL camp shoes. Weighed 2.1 oz in size XL. Actually, I’m impressed. Surprisingly comfortable and functional, especially for something so light. Can’t speak to durability since I’ve yet to try them in the field, but they don’t seem that fragile to me. I’ll be taking them on a trip this weekend to try them out.

PostedNov 14, 2024 at 6:28 am

I ordered and received the new zpacks UL camp shoes. Weighed 2.1 oz in size XL. Actually, I’m impressed. Surprisingly comfortable and functional, especially for something so light. Can’t speak to durability since I’ve yet to try them in the field, but they don’t seem that fragile to me. I’ll be taking them on a trip this weekend to try them out.

Cool – please report back!

Jarkko K BPL Member
PostedNov 14, 2024 at 7:25 am

Related to the Zpacks shoes, I wish they would use a fabric without the C6 DWR. Those environmentally harmful chemicals should already be history in outdoor gear.

Fifty Weekends BPL Member
PostedNov 14, 2024 at 8:30 am

I ordered and received the new zpacks UL camp shoes. Weighed 2.1 oz in size XL. Actually, I’m impressed. Surprisingly comfortable and functional, especially for something so light. Can’t speak to durability since I’ve yet to try them in the field, but they don’t seem that fragile to me. I’ll be taking them on a trip this weekend to try them out.

+1 let us know your impressions. Just looking at the photos on the website, the soles appear to be EVA foam which has been heat stamped to have a tread (and likely compress it somewhat for additional toughness). I would expect this to provide some insulation value but not be tough enough for scrambling on sharp rocks.

jscott Blocked
PostedNov 14, 2024 at 2:30 pm

those zpacks camp shoes look great to me.

If the soles keep Ponderosa pine needles from penetrating–and they would seem toe easily do this–what’s not to like?

I’m a rebel and would use these for many stream crossings as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 116 total)
Loading...