This was a PHD awarded by a major UK university. The citations were all peer-reviewed, though many were in German, as there has been more concern in Europe. I skimmed it and found it convincing. And as I said, he gave me practical demonstrations that mercury is not contained securely within amalgam.
If there are no concerns, why are national and international health authorities beginning to ban the use of amalgam?
There’s a lot of history and politics involved – the ADA was set up specifically to defend the use of amalgam dentistry. Their motive was to make dentistry more affordable than gold-based dentistry, but the mainstream profession at the time had banned the use of such a toxic material in direct contact with body tissue, which is why practitioners using amalgam had to break away.
In the opinion of the toxicologist who wrote the doctorate, the profession is covering up in the same way as the cigarette industry covered up for decades until it became impossible to hold the line. In his view, the ADA is running scared of the potential for a humongous class action against them.
Now that national bodies are moving against amalgam, it will be interesting to see how this develops.