Topic
Hydrostatic Head Testing of .75 oz Cuben Dyneema, Green with E type Myler
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Hydrostatic Head Testing of .75 oz Cuben Dyneema, Green with E type Myler
- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 11 months ago by Stephen Seeber.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 14, 2019 at 2:32 am #3592904
Sam Farrington requested that I perform a Hydrostatic Head test on two samples of .75 oz/ square yard Cuben Dyneema fabric, green, with E type Myler. I don’t know the age of the fabric. Perhaps Sam can provide that information. The 18″ by 18″ samples were sent rolled in a tube, so no creasing was present. I tested one sample as received. The other was aged using the process developed by Richard Nisley. The results are as follow:
As can be seen, there is a fair amount of variation among each group of samples. However, the aged samples show substantial degradation in hydrostatic head.
May 14, 2019 at 2:51 am #3592906Guess I need to learn to spell Mylar!
May 14, 2019 at 3:37 am #3592913Thank you, Stephen.
The material, as received from Cubic Technologies, was labelled “CT2E.08”
Found the thread I posted about it at: https://backpackinglight.com/forums/topic/41273/
So it is about eight years old since purchase, stored rolled on the tube it was shipped on since January 2011. But don’t know it’s date of manufacture.
Did not make a tent out of it, and given the water resistance after simulated aging, and some other issues discussed in the above link, do not expect I will. Hope this is helpful.
May 14, 2019 at 12:36 pm #3592942Very interesting…so the samples tested are approximately the same age (first half of 2011) as those tested in RN’s “dirty little secret” post…arguably the genesis of the Cuben HH discussion on BPL.
It would be very interesting to see identical tests done on current production 0.75 DCF to verify the claims that the longevity of the mylar has been improved. Even better, and obviously quite a bit of work to pull off…tests on 0.75 material of several different vintages.
May 14, 2019 at 12:47 pm #3592945If someone has samples of current fabric , I can test it. However in view of the results of my recent test of .5 oz new Dyneema, it should do well. PM me to set up the test.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.