i havent seen any discussion or testing about this on da intrawebz before … so ill kick it off
basically there are two main ways to set up guylines
- directly into the guypoint through something like a line loc 3 or a blakes hitch (zpacks for example)
- looped back to itself through and then through some kind of tensioner such as a micro line loc (most larger manufaturer tents)
the latter loop style HALVES the force on the tensioner vs putting it directly into the guy point … thus reducing the potential for slipping
what i find most interesting is that most of the stories of slipping you hear of are of line loc 3s set up directly through the guypoints … you hear much less of micro line locs slipping, likely because they need to be setup in a loop configuration
now going directly in has the advantage that the length is variable from 0 => the full length of the cord which may matter if you need to slam the walls to the ground
but where the guypoint is higher up, theres no real advantage other than a miniscule point of weight savings …. at the cost of doubling the force on the tensioner vs a loop setup
this is especially true on areas of high stress such as ridgeline guypoints
interesingly enough the great skurkas “pulley” method reduces the force even more by around 2/3 on the tensioner/knot as compared to doing directly in
interestingly enough ive never seen a discussion about it as all the numbers can be confirmed with a bit of testing and a cheap fishing scale …
;)
jerry …





