“but it is still a bit unclear to me why you then would get the explorer for navigation, because it seems there are better Garmins out there to do that”
I absolutely agree however there aren’t better Garmins out there that do navigation and communication.
For years I carried 2 devices… a communication device (I’ve had a Spot and two earlier inReach devices) and a Garmin GPS. I could have carried a communication device and a phone for navigation (and I tried) but that’s still two devices… and as I mentioned before, I think a phone is a poor device for back-country navigation… at least for me.
It wasn’t until the inReach Explorer+ was released that I was able to take a single device that can do navigation (it’s a fully functional mapping GPS) and communications. The Explorer+ was an easy decision for me, especially since I’m a bit of a GPS geek. I have tons of routes and waypoints from planned trips and previous trips that I can load on my Explorer+ and use for navigation. I also keep all of the tracks I put down on my trips (the Explorer+ does that well). I have stated before that the GPS functionality of the Explorer+ is very “old”, and I was hoping that Garmin would add satellite communication to one of their high-end (larger screen) handheld devices but that has yet to be seen… maybe some day, but until then, the Explorer+ meets most of my needs (and I’m phone free!).