Thanks so much to all for the constructive comments on our slower hiking article(s).
In reply, you are quite right, Roger, that Geoff and I have little experience in tunnel tents. And zero in mids! Â We have mostly used conventional geodesics and domes in the past, (and before that A frames remarkably similar to those of today!) followed by silpoly and dcf non freestanding ones more recently. We do include tunnels in our articles and recommend them for their wind performance.
Geoff and I are by no means the most experienced hikers out there, which is why we decided to interview tent manufacturers,  and why we read forums such as this one for the wealth of experience presented by members. We added Ron of MLD  to our interview list  because of your comments here regarding the absence of mids in our coverage, and have edited to include this design in the first article as well.
The Duplex tent is our least favourite DCF tent for a number of  reasons, but it has performed adequately for us in high winds, described in the third article.  That’s not to say it’s the best for high winds, far from it. However, we (and no doubt you) have often seen less wind-resistant but well- pitched shelters outperforming more wind resistant but poorly pitched models.  And as you note, terrain and choice of pitch are huge factors too, of course.  The series of articles is aimed at a demographic midpoint between highly experienced knowledgeable hikers such as in these forums, and newer hikers with some experience who deserve more than the basic ten bullet points available in most generalist offerings.
Geoff and I always welcome constructive criticism of our work and are happy to edit articles in response if necessary, so that the information we present is as accurate and useful as possible – thank you again for your comments here!
Helen (and Geoff),
Slower Hiking