Topic
Down filler bags – full body, or half-body pied d’éléphant?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Down filler bags – full body, or half-body pied d’éléphant?
- This topic has 66 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 2 days, 3 hours ago by Terran Terran.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nov 26, 2024 at 4:21 am #3823046
Why not just buy a smaller bag with more loft? Other than cost. With an inner bag, there’s 2 extra layers of fabric that add very little to warmth. I would argue that there’s less trapped air than with a pair of down trousers, plus if you use them while setting up camp, you’re warmer going into the bag. There’s no heat inside the bag until you crawl in. It can actually be colder. Even with thermals, there is often heat lost through conduction when you lay down.
Nov 26, 2024 at 7:36 am #3823050It will be very constricting, to the point of being unusable to size the outer, main bag for a fit close enough to eliminate the majority of dead air space. This is simply not an option, imo.
Which leaves the filler bag, or deal with the air.
I recently tried the filler option on a quickly arising trip opportunity where my winter bag was unavailable. It was cozy and warm and softly snug with room to move, ie pretty much ideal regarding comfort. Quite surprised, actually!
The low outside the tent was 10°F with 12-15 most of the night. Heavy snow added insulation to the tent! Wearing base layers I had a 30°F outer bag and an inner bag of identical size with 7 ounces of down, which the maker calls 45°F, but I’ve used it in colder weather just fine.
This combo was almost too warm, even with just a 3.2R-value pad plus Thinlite on packed snow. I feel like 5°F outside the tent would have been fine.
Nov 26, 2024 at 7:40 am #3823053yeah, exactly, two extra layers of fabric
if a sleeping bag is 65 inches x 72 inches, that would be 3.6 square yards
7.2 square yards for 2 layers
5 ounces of 0.7 ozyd2 fabric
you wouldn’t notice a pack that weighs 5 ounces less. I think maybe 1 pound is the minimum noticeable amount. If you could save 5 ounces here, and 11 ounces elsewhere, you could reduce your pack weight a noticeable amount.
Nov 26, 2024 at 12:28 pm #3823082Are folks sure that the “get the lightest bag for conditions…and then bring added fillers of various sorts to keep warm in real terms”…is the best approach?
Down remains the most weight efficient insulation. How about bringing a heavier bag and leaving all the fillers behind? beyond what we’d wear around camp.
i’m suggesting that a single, well filled bag is simpler and ultimately comes in lighter than all the alternatives involving adding yet more layers to compensate for the initial insufficiency of a light bag.
there’s another thread going about the usefulness of vests. Some advocate using a vest and then adding some variety of arm warmers to compensate. In the end, it all adds up to more hassle and weight than simply bringing a good down jacket.
–a vest weighs less than a down jacket! great!!
–but my arms and hands are cold
–add in down arm warmers!!
…really? isn’t that just a jacket, in three parts? Isn’t a bag plus various fillers just a heavier bag than one single, more generous down filled bag, that’s without the hassle of layers?
Nov 26, 2024 at 12:50 pm #3823084@Jerry To wrap over me inside a bag, the filler liner definitely wouldn’t need to be 65 x 72 inches. It could be narrower than the narrowest quilt.
@George H “Which leaves the filler bag, or deal with the air.” I agree. That’s why the idea of a single bag simply can’t do what a filler liner can do.Sounds like your experience in the field validates the idea and calls for more testing.
Nov 26, 2024 at 1:25 pm #3823090Ahhh… then it would add even less than 5 ounces. Small enough if it was accomplishing something useful.
Nov 26, 2024 at 1:47 pm #3823097“Ahhh… then it would add even less than 5 ounces. Small enough if it was accomplishing something useful.’
wouldn’t adding five ounces of down to the single bag accomplish something even more useful? Or 3 ounces? while eliminating the fiddle factor of several layers?
I understand that folks are trying to solve convection issues through so called empty spaces in a single bag. In that case, maybe order a small bag?
Are we sure that those “empty spaces” don’t serve a purpose? for example, allowing the transmission of moisture outwards? or for that matter, O2 inwards? really, I don’t know the answers. I don’t hike in consistent, well below freezing temps that fall even farther at night, so yes, my experience is limited in this regard. I tend to trust simpler solutions to reach the same aim as more complicated designs.
Nov 26, 2024 at 2:21 pm #3823098Your air space would need to be pretty evenly distributed or you’d have compression in some areas and gaps in others. Still more feasible then a bag inside a bag.
Nov 26, 2024 at 2:43 pm #3823102jscott, I agree. My experience w a filler situation happened because my winter bag was unavailable. Would never have thought about using an INNER-bag otherwise. I typically layer something other than down on the outside to deal with frost and dew and spilling coffee
The two bags weighed a little more than a WM VersaLite, with a little less fill – so in theory less efficient had I been just as comfy in a VersaLite. Will never know, as these unique scenarios can’t be replicated at will.
Other considerations: If moisture build-up occurs on a long trip and a drying opportunity presents itself surely it would be faster to dry two thinner bags.
And say one layer had horizontal baffles and the other vertical, maybe potential shifting down mass would behave different in each layer and not create as dramatic cold bridges as in one poorly designed bag.
What about the unavoidable air space between the two bags, however little? Adds warmth or no?
Nov 26, 2024 at 3:22 pm #3823104I don’t use sleeves with my vest. It’s there to add extra insulation to my torso while wearing a light synthetic jacket. The jacket can take a light rain and protects the down. If I rip my jacket, which I tend to do, I don’t lose insulation. I just do what works for me. Not necessarily always the lightest. I also tend to sit around camp more than in the past. To me, adding body insulation makes sense. Living in a cool climate, I get more use out of it. Finances aren’t unlimited. A new heavier quilt is a luxury. While waiting to buy one, I was gifted one. Not what I would have bought, but still a nice quilt. I got a new lawnmower instead.
Nov 26, 2024 at 3:41 pm #3823105This is becoming interesting!
It seems that George’s experience validates what PHD are claiming – that a filler bag offers excellent warmth for weight, despite the additional non-insulating fabric.
Let’s crunch the numbers.
Their filler weighs 240g and they claim it adds 10C of capacity to their sleep system. Serious reviewers like Chris Townsend and Andy Kirkpatrick regularly confirm PHD’s performance claims and Andy raves about the filler bag, so let’s assume that this is true.
Using the PHD bag configurator for their non-technical hiking bag with 900FP (EU) down:
3C comfort rating: 489g.
-7C comfort rating: 728g.
So to achieve the same 10C improvement, you’re looking at almost exactly the same weight as the filler.
But the filler gives you a more modular system that can be adapted to a wider range of temperatures. The inner bag can be used in alpine huts. Two thinner bags will air out more quickly than one thick bag, as others have pointed out.
That’s quite a range of benefits for the same weight of sleep system. I’m beginning like this idea!
Nov 26, 2024 at 7:21 pm #3823124“yeah, exactly, two extra layers of fabric”
it’s those non-insulating layers of fabric that makes me wonder about this system. Maybe they are precisely what provide the ‘fill” that takes up empty space? But these layers have no insulating value, so….
I tend to turn from side to side when I sleep. In my generous mummy, this is not an issue. I don’t drag it with me when I turn. Adding inner layers would seem to complicate this. Even at home, if I get twisted up in layers of sheet and blankets, it can wake me up. I could see how all of this might be exacerbated within the confines of a sleeping system that uses two separate layers.
But I’m just speaking theoretically, since I don’t sleep outdoors in winter conditions. folks should listen to others with real world experience.
(I have spent tons of nights at well below freezing temps so I’m not a neophyte. And I’ve used a 10 degree mummy bag and pad in those conditions.)
Nov 26, 2024 at 9:44 pm #3823138@jscott – I suspect that the way you’re using your mummy is unusual.
Certainly, when it’s cold I’m cinching up the hood and drawing the baffle snugly round my shoulders. So the bag turns with me. I’ve shared a tent with plenty others over the years and they all used their bag this way. How do you avoid waking up with the hood over your face?
So for me and for most others, I think, this wouldn’t be an issue – the filler bag would turn with them. But one thing I’ve learned is that sleep is very personal and there’s no solution that will suit everyone.
Nov 27, 2024 at 5:43 am #3823145I agree with jscott. I think an inside quilt would end up wadded to one side. Purely hypothetical though. Not to discourage. Experimentation is good. I have a few failed experiments in my gear closet as well as successful ones. Some I wish I’d have done better use with the money. Finding a super narrow quilt may be a challenge. I’d try it with a blanket, though I find quilts much more slippery. Using a foot box might help. I’d be more prone to use a synthetic over quilt that could be strapped down. But that’s just me. We all do sleep different.
Nov 27, 2024 at 9:24 am #3823149I notice PHD doesn’t allow feedback on their videos. Too many negative comments?
Nov 29, 2024 at 5:00 am #3823236Not sure why PHD would get negative comments – they make some of the best gear on the planet. They are the first port of call for many leading endurance athletes and alpinists – for both the quality of their products and the quality of their advice. Reviews of their kit are invariably outstanding.
They do charge a premium price, but everything is made here in the UK so their costs will be high. And the ultra-rare 1000FP (EU) down they use in their top offerings must be insanely expensive. They have as many dedicated customers as they can handle, so who am I to judge?
I’d imagine that the lack of comments is down to their rather strange attitude towards customer relations. For example, with their clothing they don’t reveal the quantity of down used. They regard it as a trade secret and expect you to rely on their temperature recommendations! They’re the kind of company that believes the manufacturer is always right. They’re based in Yorkshire – if you knew the place you’d understand!
Nov 29, 2024 at 5:16 am #3823238I knew Lord Hanson…
Nov 29, 2024 at 5:37 am #3823239What is the basis for this negativity towards a well-respected and innovative artisan company?
Nov 29, 2024 at 6:23 am #3823240I don’t mean to be negative. I don’t trust advice where peer review isn’t allowed. Not even EN. Especially when abstract claims are being made. I don’t take the word of influencers. I prefer the Durston model. I realize you’re in the MYOG group where cost isn’t as much of an issue. Try it. I’m sure you can make it work. I have my own style, I wear an extra later, but I do believe jscott has it right.
Nov 29, 2024 at 8:20 am #3823243“Abstract influencers”? Where did that come from?
PHD do their research in a commercial freezer, and then test in the field with their wide network of knowledgeable customers and reviewers. That’s why I trust them.
As I posted above, here’s a rave review of the concept by Andy “Psycho” Kirkpatrick, one of the gnarliest and most experienced alpinists alive. And he’s also deeply knowledgeable about gear. Call Andy an “abstract influencer” to his face and things won’t end well!
https://www.andy-kirkpatrick.com/blog/view/phd-k-bag
No-one’s forcing you to go this way – that’s the freedom of the hills. But I don’t understand why you have to be disrespectful towards people who are developing interesting new ideas.
I don’t feel that this is constructive, so I’ll draw a line at that.
Nov 29, 2024 at 9:01 am #3823246“I realize you’re in the MYOG group where cost isn’t as much of an issue. ”
I question that you save money with MYOG. I keep making new prototypes to test out new theories. It ends up costing more.
But not always. It’s possible to save money. I made several tarps with 3 mil plastic that worked pretty good.
Nov 29, 2024 at 9:32 am #3823247I said “abstract claims”. I was actually looking for information of which there is very little. I read one review with the half bag referring to also wearing a heavy parka and down pants. Seems like it’s an isolated group centered around climbing rather than ultralight. Also centered somewhat around those using huts. Those with specific needs. Still nothing about using a “filler”. The example given here was the use of 2 bags , not necessarily a filler bag. As Jerry said, it’s only 5 ounces. The idea that it would add extra warmth by filling up airspace… I need to ask, what airspace? There are gaps, but to fill them in with a quilt, you’ll still have gaps.
I’m kind of envious of MYOG. I don’t have the dedication. You can experiment, tear it apart and make new experiments. I’m open to new ideas. I’d like to see the research.Nov 29, 2024 at 10:03 am #3823248I have noticed an air space on each side of me, about 3 inches wide at the bottom.
I’ve tried a couple things to get the quilt to hang down better and cover me with no success
I suspect this is a minor issue, I could figure this out
I often wear insulation that’s about the same amount as the quilt. Then, if this is a non issue, the air temperature in that gap would be halfway between my skin (~95 F) and the air temp. If this is significant, the gap would be colder.
Next time I’m sleeping in the cold I’ll have to check this out.
If I remember. This doesn’t seem like it would be significant. I’ve kind of de-prioritized this mystery. So many mysteries to solve.
My circumference is maybe 42 inches. 3 inches on each side is 6 inches. So, only 15% of my skin surface insulation is degraded.
Nov 29, 2024 at 10:06 am #3823249actually, wearing insulation largely solves this problem. No air gap.
Nov 29, 2024 at 10:32 am #3823250I think a couple of long narrow pillows would better fill the gap. The Zenbivy address’s that issue with the overlapping sheet. The sides of the quilt hang down into that space. I haven’t used a mummy bag in many years, but I believe they minimize that space as well. Given proper size and loft.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Garage Grown Gear 2024 Holiday Sale Nov 25 to Dec 2:
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.