Topic

DIY – wax based stoves for backpackers


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Make Your Own Gear DIY – wax based stoves for backpackers

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3605109
    Jon Fong / Flat Cat Gear
    BPL Member

    @jonfong

    Locale: FLAT CAT GEAR

    I have been working on a wax based stove for several years.  The results have been very encouraging as I was able to produce a soot free stove that could boil water in the same time as a good alcohols stove.  In fact, I was planning on writing an article on a DIY wax-based stove for backpackinglight.  In drafting the article, it became apparent to me that the practical risk far outweighs the benefits (at least in my mind).

    Here is my rational: for backpackers, the primary purpose of a stove is to boil water.  I know, not rocket science.  There is a phenomenon called Wax Fire that I believe to be a significant issue.

    From Wikipedia

    A wax fire is created when melted or boiling wax is doused in water. The ensuing reaction creates a large fireball or enlarges the flame of the already existing fire incredibly. Only a small amount of wax and water is needed to create a wax fire.

    Chemistry behind the reaction

    Following the basic rules of the fire triangle, for a reaction to take place three ingredients are required: oxygen, fuel, and heat. In the case of wax melted down, only the top surface has access to oxygen, so the fire progresses slowly. When water is added to the wax, two things happen. Firstly, the water — being denser than wax — sinks to the bottom of the container. Secondly, as burning wax quickly reaches a temperature of well over 200 degrees C, the water instantly vaporizes. When water changes from a liquid to a gas, there is more than a thousand-fold increase in volume. The water expands violently, and throws the hot wax layer above it into the air as small droplets. The wax now has a much bigger surface area exposed to oxygen so combustion takes place very quickly.

    How big of an issue is this?  Well, check out a few of these videos.

    https://youtu.be/PSg7dwmATPc

    https://youtu.be/lVfagFSxdqw

    Since you are vaporizing water, it would only tale a few drops to cause a flare-up.  I would image that if one were not careful, water boiling over the top of a mug would cause a significant problem.  Can a wax stove be designed to minimize flare-ups?  I am sure that it can, however; the added safety features would probably come at a cost of complexity, weight and reliability.  For now, I am abandoning further work on wax-based stove.  My 2 cents.

    #3605119
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    That makes sense

    If the wax was soaked into a substrate, like cardboard, then this wouldn’t be a risk?

    #3605127
    Jon Fong / Flat Cat Gear
    BPL Member

    @jonfong

    Locale: FLAT CAT GEAR

    Jerry,

    I think that the problem still exist.  The wax has to get into a molten state before you can get the flame to stabilize.  I used carbon felt and saw how the system melted the entire pool of wax.  Think of it this way: molten wax is similar to hot oil.  If they are light and you pour water on them,both of them will flare up into a fireball.  That is why when you have an oil fire in the kitchen you never use water to put it out.  My 2 cents.

    #3605143
    MJ H
    BPL Member

    @mjh

    I’m not sure I learned the right lesson, but thanks.

    #3605206
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    I’m with MJH.  Sounds like a new experiment to do with the kids.  Here we are lighting clouds of methane-filled soap bubbles):

    #3605207
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    Jerry:  I’ve tried a variety of wax-soaked cardboard configurations and they worked fine, but were like a candle – a sooty flame.  Jon’s figured out a more clever way to burn wax vapor with enough oxygen to avoid the soot, but I suspect that the wax is therefore a lot hotter.  And more of it is liquid at once.

    #3605215
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    ahh…  that makes sense.  wax soaked cardboard does produce soot

    #3605335
    R
    Spectator

    @autox

    Jon,

    Given your background, it’s very plausible that you’ve achieved your claims, but this still reads a bit funny: I’ve solved a hard problem but I’m not sharing the solution or any proof that I actually have.

    People have been cooking over tea candles for ages but this hazard doesn’t appear to be a common problem. Maybe you’re over estimating the actual risk.  Maybe if you share your work, fresh eyes will see elegant safety enhancements.

    #3605354
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    tea candles, same thing, sooty

    #3605359
    Jon Fong / Flat Cat Gear
    BPL Member

    @jonfong

    Locale: FLAT CAT GEAR

    Here is the deal, I have created a wax based stove that burns with a blue flame and is soot free.  I did post some videos on it, but was requested to remove them by Ray Gatt as he thought that they violated his patent (they don’t).  The stove is actually out on loan to Hikin’ Jim and maybe he can chime in on the performance.

    As I was writing up the article on wax based stoves, I was listing out the pro’s and con’s of the stove, fire wax is a significant issue.  During the product development process there is a process called failure modes , effects and critical analysis (FMECA).  Basically what is the worst thing that can happen to your product.  In this case, a flare up due to water accidently dripping into flaming wax is a significant event.  Releasing the DIY plan as is opens up the risk of injury to level that I thought was unacceptable.  Particularly in the curretn digital age, once information is out there it can spread quickly. 19/20 people may be perfectly safe, but that 1/20 can cause some serious damage.  If you have doubts, go look at those videos that I posted of Wax Fire.

    Is it solvable? absolutely.  That being said, a wax based stove still has only a niche application.  There are only so many hours in a day and I am not sure that this is worth the effort at this time.  My 2 cents.

    #3605393
    JCH
    BPL Member

    @pastyj-2-2

    I support Jon for taking an educated and ethical decision, as well as decided CYA.  Anyone is free to disagree with that decision…I do not.  Intelligently done Jon.

    #3605422
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    I concur.  I’ve long pondered the results of accidentally spilling boiling hot water (or Ramen noodles) onto a butane-mix canister and while I can imagine it going badly, it would be a rare constellation of conditions for a canister to rupture.  There’d be poor heat transfer on the top of the canister (since there’s only butane gas on the other side), the butane is typically a bit cool when in use, very hot water cools quickly by evaporation, and the canisters do take a pretty high temperature before exploding as Roger has tested.

    But a few drops of water from a pot, pot filling, a big raindrop(?) or certainly a trickle of rain off your parka hood or tent/tarp over you into that molten wax that’s far above 100C?  That seems a lot more likely and has very dramatic results.

    Thanks Jon, for the heads up.  I play with melted wax at times, albeit usually just barely above its melting point, and I’ll be more careful in the future.

    #3605459
    Jean-Francois Jobin
    BPL Member

    @jfjobin

    Niche application:I dream for wax stove since 2 years for  canadian artic  plane fuel/gas law restriction.

     

    #3605561
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    Jean-Francois:  PM me – I’ve come up with some solutions for Adak which, unlike many Alaskan towns accessible by bush plane, is only served by 737s out of Anchorage so everything has to get past TSA.

    #3605680
    R
    Spectator

    @autox

    Looks like an inverted can for the stove body would create a splash guard.

    Found the relevant thread: https://backpackinglight.com/forums/topic/another-wax-stove/

    (and several others: https://www.google.com/search?q=site://backpackinglight.com+wax+stove)

     

    #3825700
    John “Jay” Menna
    BPL Member

    @jaymenna78734

    Locale: 30.3668397,-97.7399123

    Jon:

    I’ve been tinkering with this project for a while now, but just for personal use. Just a heads-up—it seems the patent has been abandoned. If that reignites your interest, I’d be thrilled to see you take it further!

    https://patents.google.com/patent/US20110239539

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Loading...