Topic

Dead Bird Shells

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
PostedFeb 1, 2018 at 3:22 am

Hey, all. It has been a while since I have posted on here, but I am looking for some advice on Arcteryx shells and was hoping for some guidance. Years ago I purchased a Beta AR jacket, which served me well until the Gore-Tex began to delaminate around the collar. I had meant to send it in for repairs before walking the Camino de Santiago last year, but I dragged my feet and waited too long to send it in. Fortunately, I was able to pick up a Beta LT Hybrid jacket on sale at REI before I left, and wouldn’t you know it, I fell in love with that shell in Spain. While not as robust as the Beta AR, the Beta LT Hybrid is lighter and still performed well in inclement weather along the way.

Well fast forward a couple months and I finally get around to sending in the Beta AR to Arcteryx. It took about a month for them to get back to me, but apparently the jacket can’t be repaired so they’re giving me credit for a full replacement (Aye-Oh!). The thing is, now that I have the Beta LT Hybrid, I’m not so sure that I have as much need for the Beta AR. If I could only have one shell and one shell only, it would be the Beta AR. But if I can have two, and one is a Beta LT Hybrid… Maybe the Beta SV?

I recently went into the Arcteryx store in LA to check out their current offerings and was disappointed to find out that they aren’t currently carrying the Beta SV. The closest thing they had was the Alpha SV, which is a longer cut and uses their burliest Gore-Tex material (N100p-X). The Alpha line is clearly not for me, as I prefer the hip length cut of the Beta line. But I will say that the jacket felt like it could survive a nuclear winter.

I realize that the Beta SV doesn’t use the same Gore-Tex as the Alpha SV; however, when compared with the Beta AR, the Beta SV is made entirely from N80p-X Gore-Tex while the Beta AR only uses the N80p-X to reinforce high-wear areas. If the SV came with the drop hood I think I would have already pulled the trigger, but before I did anything I figured I would return to my BPL roots for advice.

Does anyone have experience with the Beta SV? I’m sure I can return it and go with a different option if I’m not satisfied, but I would prefer to get it right the first time. On a somewhat-related side note, I found it interesting that Arcteryx has apparently discontinued the Beta LT Hybrid from their lineup. Given its light weight and (relatively) affordable price point, I kind of wonder if the Beta LT Hybrid was cannibalizing some of their other (more expensive) product lines.

TL;DR

Already own a 2016 Arcteryx Beta LT Hybrid jacket and have $575 credit to apply towards another Arcteryx product. Leaning towards a Beta SV jacket. Only considering shells with pit-zips.

Bruce Tolley BPL Member
PostedFeb 1, 2018 at 3:50 pm

Kudos to Arcteryx for standing behind their product.

You don’t say what your other activities are. For summer backpacking, I take the lightest shell which currently is a 10 plus year old deadbird Goretex Packlite with pit zips. For winter snow camping and shoulder season, I take a longer length and roomier (to leave room for mid layers) BetaAR Goretex shell.  The newer ARs seem shorter than the one I had years ago. If I were to replace it, would get the longer shell for winter snow camping.

PostedFeb 1, 2018 at 7:54 pm

If it was me, I’d go for a Norvan (not the Norval SL) which is really light, and does have pit vents. It’s their best jacket for backpacking.

That’s only $300 or so, so get a second one for someone else.

Matt Dirksen BPL Member
PostedFeb 1, 2018 at 8:04 pm

“You don’t say what your other activities are.”

Agreed. It’s possible your new garment might be something totally unrelated and used for a totally different activity. (Like the Keppel trench coat,  Alpha AR pants, Fission SV?)

Regardless, the Beta LT hybrid is quite versitle, and I’d think having the Beta SV might feel rather redundant.

Nick D BPL Member
PostedFeb 1, 2018 at 8:08 pm

I’d say you don’t necessarily need two shells that do the same thing…

Another option….. If you don’t already have an insulation piece, I found the Arcteryx Cerium LT to be amazing. It’s incredibly light and VERY warm. I like it so much I’ve sold my Montbell Alpine Light and use it now for 4-seasons. Also, if you don’t already have a wind shell, I highly recommend the Squamish. Because of the features and fit, I often take it over my Houdini now. (you could have BOTH for $525 I’d think). Other pieces I own or desire: Motus longsleeve shirt (love it, fantastic), the Atom LT Jacket (don’t own, but very well reviewed), Gamma LT Pants (don’t own, I can’t get myself to spend that kind of dough on pants).

I’m a big Arcteryx fan.I have not found another brand that’s fits as well … and I actually have a Beta LT on order right now. ;)

PostedFeb 1, 2018 at 9:48 pm

Thanks for all the feedback everyone. It’s nice getting some outside perspective.

Sorry for not providing better insight on how I intend to use the jacket. I’m a hiker first and foremost. One of these days I will finally commit to the AT or CDT, but in the meantime I seem pretty content hiking shorter treks at elevation wherever I can find them. Last year I spent a month in Huaraz, Peru, and hiked both the Alpamayo/Santa Cruz Trek and the Huayhuash Circuit. In previous years I have hiked the Wind River High Route, the Wonderland Trail, the Zion Traverse, to name a few. This upcoming fall I’m hoping to spend October and November hiking in the Himalayas, so maybe there is a jacket that would make sense for that trip?

@ Jeff: Unfortunately the Theta SV doesn’t appear to be in the current Arcteryx lineup. Since it’s not currently listed on their website (the only Theta jacket they have listed is a Theta AR) I’m assuming the Alpha SV replaced it in their product line.

@ Bruce: Couldn’t agree with you more in regards to Arcteryx standing behind their products. I never imagined that they would offer me a replacement when I sent the jacket in for repairs. It’s interesting that you found the new Beta ARs to be a shorter than the older models because I found the exact opposite. My torso is tiny and I vividly remember thinking “Who is going to buy a jacket that is cut this short?” Even on me (<16 inches from C7 to IC) I found that it rode higher than I would have liked. Fast forward to the trip out to the Arcteryx store in LA and I was pleasantly surprised to find that they took my recommendations into consideration. The new Beta AR fits great. Not too short, not too long.

@ Dan: Not sure how I never noticed it, but the Norvan is an interesting option as well. Maybe I can swing by the LA store and try it on for size.

@ Matt: I think you touched on my biggest concern: redundancy. I guess I was thinking that the Beta LT Hybrid would be my go-to, three-season shell when weight is the biggest factor, and when conditions looked ominous, I would leave it at home in favor of something more robust like the Beta SV.

@ Nick: The Cerium LT is an interesting option to consider. I’ve never owned an Arcteryx insulating jacket before, but I’m sure they’re incredible.

I should probably point out that I have a number of other jackets that might change the advice given on this thread. Back in 2011 I picked up a Montbell Thermawrap UL and a Montbell Frost Line Parka. The former I take on damn near every backpacking trip I go on, while the latter has only been used off the trail, walking around town. While I am starting to acquire more gear for winter hiking, for the time being I don’t see myself hiking anywhere that the temperature drops below the teens. If I didn’t already own the Beta AR pants I would probably us the credit to pick up a pair (how people hike w/o rain pants is beyond me). I do have a skiing trip coming up in March, so maybe I should be looking at their winter sports offerings. Once again, thanks for all the advice and intel. This community always keeps me coming back.

PostedFeb 1, 2018 at 10:03 pm

I’m not trying to derail Andrew’s thread, and maybe a decent answer to my question will help him too.

Is there any sort of “Rosetta stone” for understanding Arcteryx’s entire line of jackets?

Alpha, Beta, Theta, Gamma, various suffixes.

The mind boggles!  Is there a master table somewhere that explains/compares features of each model?

 

 

Parker BPL Member
PostedFeb 6, 2018 at 9:46 pm

I am going to have to second Dan’s recommendation of the Norvan shell (regular Norvan, NOT the Norvan SL).  I love my Norvan.  It is intended for trail running, or other high intensity activities.  However, I have found that it works exceptionally well for backpacking.  Since it was designed for trail running, it is cut slim (great for us skinny folk) and it breathes really well.  I have also found it to be very waterproof.  The pit openings don’t have zips (you can’t close them), which I thought would be an issue.  Turns out, they work great.  Never had a problem with water getting in and they allow my pits to breath.  I have a medium in the blue color (I think they only have black and red now) and it weighs in right at 7.1 ounces.  I pair mine up with a Ghost Whisperer, but a Cerium SL would also work great.  For the amount of credit you have, you can almost get both the Norvan shell and a Cerium SL.

PostedFeb 10, 2018 at 7:51 pm

Thanks for the insight, Rob! I think I’m going to make another trip over to the Arcteryx store to try on some of the options that I passed over on my first trip out there. The Norvan was never even on my radar until I started this thread. I’m really intrigued on the pit opening design. Thanks again for the recommendations!

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Loading...