Topic

cyanobacteria warning

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Sharon J. BPL Member
PostedSep 21, 2016 at 11:47 am

http://www.sgvtribune.com/health/20160831/toxin-known-to-kill-dogs-within-30-minutes-found-in-several-california-lakes-rivers

“Out of the more than 30 bodies of water where dangerous algae toxins have been detected this year, anatoxin has been found in at least two rivers and five lakes, including Lake Shasta in Northern California and Lake Elsinore in Riverside County, Anderson-Abbs said. It’s one of several toxins produced by cyanobacteria, commonly known as blue-green algae, and has been linked to dog deaths across the country.”

Anyone know if standard water-treatment methods offer protection? Anyways, be careful out there.

Art … BPL Member
PostedSep 21, 2016 at 12:35 pm

from what I’ve read about this in the past, many (most) back packer water treatment systems are not effective against this. the issue is the toxins produced, not so much the algae or bacteria. if the chemical toxins are not removed from the water it is still dangerous to drink.

I’m sure someone more knowledgeable will chime in soon with specifics.

Matt Dirksen BPL Member
PostedSep 21, 2016 at 2:53 pm

If I recall, the First Need filter seemed to do a good job of removing cyanobacteria but I’m not sure if there is any more recent info about it. Here’s an 8 year old publication

Eon’s ago, when I was was playing around with a First Need filter in my Scout Troop, I decided to filter Pepsi through the thing.  I was shocked to see clear, un-carbonated, sugar water come out. That water, plus the next 20 gallons of water had a sugary taste to it.

Not a bad treat for a bunch of growing Boy Scouts!

 

 

PostedSep 22, 2016 at 8:56 am

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/cyanobacteria_factsheet.pdf

See pages 7-8

According to the EPA, nanofiltration (0.001 to 0.01 microns) should take care of the toxins (extracellular microcystins) with frequent backwashing. It also looks like granular activated carbon (GAC) inactivates them, as well as chlorine (but the latter is pH dependent). UV is also supposed to be effective, but effective dosage is “impractical”.

I’d probably lean toward carbon filtration followed by nanofiltration.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Loading...